Smoking cessation in primary care - a randomized controlled trial of bupropione, nicotine replacements, CBT and a minimal intervention.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research Pub Date : 2011-03-01 DOI:10.1002/mpr.328
Hans-Ulrich Wittchen, Eva Hoch, Jens Klotsche, Stephan Muehlig
{"title":"Smoking cessation in primary care - a randomized controlled trial of bupropione, nicotine replacements, CBT and a minimal intervention.","authors":"Hans-Ulrich Wittchen,&nbsp;Eva Hoch,&nbsp;Jens Klotsche,&nbsp;Stephan Muehlig","doi":"10.1002/mpr.328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Smoking cessation has been shown to be effective in randomized controlled trials. It is unclear though, whether interventions also work in routine primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 167 primary care settings we conducted a randomized four-armed smoking cessation trial to examine the efficacy of a minimal intervention (MI; n = 81), cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT; n = 175), bupropion (BUP; n = 108) and nicotine replacements (NRT; n = 103). Overall, 467 current smokers were enrolled. Abstinence rates at the end of treatment (12 weeks) were 32.8% for MI patients, 34.8% for CBT, 35.3% for NRT, and 46.5% for BUP patients (ITT, intention to treat) (no differential effects). Retention rates were highest in the BUP group (59.3%) and lowest in the NRT group (50.5%). Completer findings were: MI, 56.4%; CBT, 64%; BUP, 79.3%; NRT, 69.2% (LOCF, lost to follow-up). No serious adverse events occurred during or after the medication phase. At 12-month follow-up continuous abstinence rates were: BUP, 29.0%; CBT, 20.9%; NRT, 29.6%; MI, 29.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that established smoking cessation treatments are effective when applied by non-specialist primary care physicians. Our data supports a structured, multimodal treatment structure as core ingredient of successful smoking cessation in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50310,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"28-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mpr.328","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Background/aims: Smoking cessation has been shown to be effective in randomized controlled trials. It is unclear though, whether interventions also work in routine primary care.

Methods: In 167 primary care settings we conducted a randomized four-armed smoking cessation trial to examine the efficacy of a minimal intervention (MI; n = 81), cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT; n = 175), bupropion (BUP; n = 108) and nicotine replacements (NRT; n = 103). Overall, 467 current smokers were enrolled. Abstinence rates at the end of treatment (12 weeks) were 32.8% for MI patients, 34.8% for CBT, 35.3% for NRT, and 46.5% for BUP patients (ITT, intention to treat) (no differential effects). Retention rates were highest in the BUP group (59.3%) and lowest in the NRT group (50.5%). Completer findings were: MI, 56.4%; CBT, 64%; BUP, 79.3%; NRT, 69.2% (LOCF, lost to follow-up). No serious adverse events occurred during or after the medication phase. At 12-month follow-up continuous abstinence rates were: BUP, 29.0%; CBT, 20.9%; NRT, 29.6%; MI, 29.6%.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that established smoking cessation treatments are effective when applied by non-specialist primary care physicians. Our data supports a structured, multimodal treatment structure as core ingredient of successful smoking cessation in primary care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健中的戒烟——一项安非他酮、尼古丁替代品、CBT和最小干预的随机对照试验。
背景/目的:在随机对照试验中,戒烟已被证明是有效的。然而,目前尚不清楚干预措施是否也适用于常规初级保健。方法:在167个初级保健环境中,我们进行了一项随机的四臂戒烟试验,以检查最小干预(MI;n=81)、认知行为疗法(CBT;n=175)、安非他酮(BUP;n=108)和尼古丁替代品(NRT;n=103)的疗效。总的来说,467名现有吸烟者被登记。MI患者在治疗结束时(12周)的禁欲率为32.8%,CBT为34.8%,NRT为35.3%,BUP患者为46.5%(ITT,意向治疗)(无差异影响)。BUP组保留率最高(59.3%),NRT组保留率最低(50.5%);CBT,64%;BUP为79.3%;NRT,69.2%(LOCF,失访)。用药期间或用药后未发生严重不良事件。在12个月的随访中,持续禁欲率为:BUP,29.0%;CBT,20.9%;NRT为29.6%;MI,29.6%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,非专业初级保健医生应用既定的戒烟治疗是有效的。我们的数据支持结构化、多模式的治疗结构,将其作为初级保健中成功戒烟的核心要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (MPR) publishes high-standard original research of a technical, methodological, experimental and clinical nature, contributing to the theory, methodology, practice and evaluation of mental and behavioural disorders. The journal targets in particular detailed methodological and design papers from major national and international multicentre studies. There is a close working relationship with the US National Institute of Mental Health, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Diagnostic Instruments Committees, as well as several other European and international organisations. MPR aims to publish rapidly articles of highest methodological quality in such areas as epidemiology, biostatistics, generics, psychopharmacology, psychology and the neurosciences. Articles informing about innovative and critical methodological, statistical and clinical issues, including nosology, can be submitted as regular papers and brief reports. Reviews are only occasionally accepted. MPR seeks to monitor, discuss, influence and improve the standards of mental health and behavioral neuroscience research by providing a platform for rapid publication of outstanding contributions. As a quarterly journal MPR is a major source of information and ideas and is an important medium for students, clinicians and researchers in psychiatry, clinical psychology, epidemiology and the allied disciplines in the mental health field.
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Translation of the Self-Report Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale. A Protocol for the International Translation and Validation of the Postpartum Specific Anxiety Scale for Preterm Birth [PSAS-PTB] and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit [PSAS-NICU] Contexts Global Functioning and Mental Health Parameters: Examining Interplay and Improvements in Inpatient Psychiatry ‘Digital Insight and Agency Scale’ (DIAS): A Novel Tool to Illuminate Young People's Agency in Mitigating the Negative Impact of Digital Activities on Their Mental Health Evaluating a Tool for Assessment of Adjustment Disorder in the U.S. Military: The Adjustment Disorder–New Module 20 for Military (ADNM-20-MIL)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1