Hans-Ulrich Wittchen, Eva Hoch, Jens Klotsche, Stephan Muehlig
{"title":"Smoking cessation in primary care - a randomized controlled trial of bupropione, nicotine replacements, CBT and a minimal intervention.","authors":"Hans-Ulrich Wittchen, Eva Hoch, Jens Klotsche, Stephan Muehlig","doi":"10.1002/mpr.328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Smoking cessation has been shown to be effective in randomized controlled trials. It is unclear though, whether interventions also work in routine primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 167 primary care settings we conducted a randomized four-armed smoking cessation trial to examine the efficacy of a minimal intervention (MI; n = 81), cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT; n = 175), bupropion (BUP; n = 108) and nicotine replacements (NRT; n = 103). Overall, 467 current smokers were enrolled. Abstinence rates at the end of treatment (12 weeks) were 32.8% for MI patients, 34.8% for CBT, 35.3% for NRT, and 46.5% for BUP patients (ITT, intention to treat) (no differential effects). Retention rates were highest in the BUP group (59.3%) and lowest in the NRT group (50.5%). Completer findings were: MI, 56.4%; CBT, 64%; BUP, 79.3%; NRT, 69.2% (LOCF, lost to follow-up). No serious adverse events occurred during or after the medication phase. At 12-month follow-up continuous abstinence rates were: BUP, 29.0%; CBT, 20.9%; NRT, 29.6%; MI, 29.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that established smoking cessation treatments are effective when applied by non-specialist primary care physicians. Our data supports a structured, multimodal treatment structure as core ingredient of successful smoking cessation in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50310,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"28-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mpr.328","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30
Abstract
Background/aims: Smoking cessation has been shown to be effective in randomized controlled trials. It is unclear though, whether interventions also work in routine primary care.
Methods: In 167 primary care settings we conducted a randomized four-armed smoking cessation trial to examine the efficacy of a minimal intervention (MI; n = 81), cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT; n = 175), bupropion (BUP; n = 108) and nicotine replacements (NRT; n = 103). Overall, 467 current smokers were enrolled. Abstinence rates at the end of treatment (12 weeks) were 32.8% for MI patients, 34.8% for CBT, 35.3% for NRT, and 46.5% for BUP patients (ITT, intention to treat) (no differential effects). Retention rates were highest in the BUP group (59.3%) and lowest in the NRT group (50.5%). Completer findings were: MI, 56.4%; CBT, 64%; BUP, 79.3%; NRT, 69.2% (LOCF, lost to follow-up). No serious adverse events occurred during or after the medication phase. At 12-month follow-up continuous abstinence rates were: BUP, 29.0%; CBT, 20.9%; NRT, 29.6%; MI, 29.6%.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that established smoking cessation treatments are effective when applied by non-specialist primary care physicians. Our data supports a structured, multimodal treatment structure as core ingredient of successful smoking cessation in primary care.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (MPR) publishes high-standard original research of a technical, methodological, experimental and clinical nature, contributing to the theory, methodology, practice and evaluation of mental and behavioural disorders. The journal targets in particular detailed methodological and design papers from major national and international multicentre studies. There is a close working relationship with the US National Institute of Mental Health, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Diagnostic Instruments Committees, as well as several other European and international organisations.
MPR aims to publish rapidly articles of highest methodological quality in such areas as epidemiology, biostatistics, generics, psychopharmacology, psychology and the neurosciences. Articles informing about innovative and critical methodological, statistical and clinical issues, including nosology, can be submitted as regular papers and brief reports. Reviews are only occasionally accepted.
MPR seeks to monitor, discuss, influence and improve the standards of mental health and behavioral neuroscience research by providing a platform for rapid publication of outstanding contributions. As a quarterly journal MPR is a major source of information and ideas and is an important medium for students, clinicians and researchers in psychiatry, clinical psychology, epidemiology and the allied disciplines in the mental health field.