Management of patients with low-grade gliomas - a survey among German neurosurgical departments.

Central European Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2011-11-01 Epub Date: 2011-05-13 DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1275351
M Seiz, C F Freyschlag, S Schenkel, C Weiss, C Thomé, K Schmieder, W Stummer, J Tuettenberg
{"title":"Management of patients with low-grade gliomas - a survey among German neurosurgical departments.","authors":"M Seiz,&nbsp;C F Freyschlag,&nbsp;S Schenkel,&nbsp;C Weiss,&nbsp;C Thomé,&nbsp;K Schmieder,&nbsp;W Stummer,&nbsp;J Tuettenberg","doi":"10.1055/s-0031-1275351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims of the study: </strong>The diagnosis and treatment of low-grade gliomas (LGG) are multimodal. Today, there is no defined standard in diagnosis and treatment. Controversies are, in general, about a \"wait-and-see\" strategy, diagnostic workup, surgical intervention, postoperative imaging, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up. The aim of this study is to gain an overview about management strategies of high-volume German neurosurgical departments treating these patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A questionnaire including diagnostic, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative parameters and 5 cases with magnetic resonance imaging data with questions to various treatment options in these patients was sent to all 34 German neurosurgical departments at university hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 24 questionnaires were returned and analysed. Centres were divided into those who generally practice a \"wait-and-see\" strategy vs. those who do not or only in highly selected cases. Statistical analyses were performed with Fisher test and Chi (2)-test. Interestingly, 50% of all centres routinely follow a \"wait-and-see\" strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the management of patients with LGG is complex and a simple questionnaire will not be able to define a standard in diagnosis and treatment, this study offers an overview on strategies at high-volume academic centres dealing with these patients. There is consensus to resect superficially located lobar and circumscribed low-grade lesions. However, the differences between centres become apparent with increasing complexity of the lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51241,"journal":{"name":"Central European Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1275351","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1275351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Background and aims of the study: The diagnosis and treatment of low-grade gliomas (LGG) are multimodal. Today, there is no defined standard in diagnosis and treatment. Controversies are, in general, about a "wait-and-see" strategy, diagnostic workup, surgical intervention, postoperative imaging, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up. The aim of this study is to gain an overview about management strategies of high-volume German neurosurgical departments treating these patients.

Material and methods: A questionnaire including diagnostic, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative parameters and 5 cases with magnetic resonance imaging data with questions to various treatment options in these patients was sent to all 34 German neurosurgical departments at university hospitals.

Results: In total, 24 questionnaires were returned and analysed. Centres were divided into those who generally practice a "wait-and-see" strategy vs. those who do not or only in highly selected cases. Statistical analyses were performed with Fisher test and Chi (2)-test. Interestingly, 50% of all centres routinely follow a "wait-and-see" strategy.

Conclusion: Although the management of patients with LGG is complex and a simple questionnaire will not be able to define a standard in diagnosis and treatment, this study offers an overview on strategies at high-volume academic centres dealing with these patients. There is consensus to resect superficially located lobar and circumscribed low-grade lesions. However, the differences between centres become apparent with increasing complexity of the lesions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低级别胶质瘤患者的处理——德国神经外科的一项调查。
研究背景和目的:低级别胶质瘤(LGG)的诊断和治疗是多模式的。今天,在诊断和治疗方面没有明确的标准。一般来说,争议在于“观望”策略、诊断检查、手术干预、术后成像、辅助治疗和随访。本研究的目的是获得关于管理策略的高容量德国神经外科部门治疗这些患者的概述。材料与方法:将5例患者的诊断、术前、围手术期、术后参数及磁共振成像资料调查表,以及对这些患者的各种治疗方案进行问卷调查,发送至德国34所大学附属医院神经外科。结果:共回收问卷24份并进行分析。研究中心被分为两组,一组通常采取“观望”策略,另一组不采取这种策略,或者只在高度选定的病例中采取这种策略。采用Fisher检验和Chi(2)检验进行统计学分析。有趣的是,50%的中心通常采取“观望”策略。结论:尽管LGG患者的管理是复杂的,简单的问卷调查将无法定义诊断和治疗的标准,但本研究提供了在处理这些患者的高容量学术中心的策略概述。目前的共识是切除位于浅表的大叶和局限的低级别病变。然而,随着病变复杂性的增加,中心之间的差异变得明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Neurosurgery
Central European Neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Elevated intracranial pressure, low cerebral perfusion pressure, and impaired brain metabolism correlate with fatal outcome after severe brain injury. WHO Grade III Anaplastic Meningioma Metastasizing to the Parotid Gland and the Lungs: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Intracranial melanotic schwannoma: a case report of recurrence with extra- and intradural manifestation two decades after initial diagnosis and treatment. Cervical pneumorrhachis caused by impact loading forces after skull base fracture: case report and review of the literature. Training microneurosurgery - four years experiences with an in vivo model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1