Minimizing brain shift during functional neurosurgical procedures - a simple burr hole technique that can decrease CSF loss and intracranial air.

Central European Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2011-11-01 Epub Date: 2011-07-07 DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1279748
V A Coenen, A Abdel-Rahman, J McMaster, N Bogod, C R Honey
{"title":"Minimizing brain shift during functional neurosurgical procedures - a simple burr hole technique that can decrease CSF loss and intracranial air.","authors":"V A Coenen,&nbsp;A Abdel-Rahman,&nbsp;J McMaster,&nbsp;N Bogod,&nbsp;C R Honey","doi":"10.1055/s-0031-1279748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exact stereotactic placement of deep brain stimulation electrodes during functional stereotactic neurosurgical procedures can be impeded by intraoperative brain shift. Brain shift has been shown to correlate with the amount of intracranial (subdural) air detected on early postoperative imaging studies. We report a simple burr hole technique that reduces the loss of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and has the potential to significantly reduce the amount of postoperative intracranial air.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 16 patients were studied with half (group 2) receiving the burr hole technique designed to seal the CSF space and thereby reducing CSF loss. The other 8 patients (group 1) received the standard burr hole technique. The 2 groups were of similar age, gender, diagnosis (Parkinson's disease, n=14; cervical dystonia n=2), and surgical targets. All patients received bilateral electrodes either in the subthalamic nucleus (STN, n=14) or in the globus pallidum internus (GPi, n=2) avoiding transventricular trajectories. Early postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) was used to check for possible bleeding, DBS lead location, and the amount of intracranial air. Intracranial air was assessed manually in a volumetric slice-by-slice approach in the individual postoperative CT and the groups compared by t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 2 showed significantly lower postoperative intracranial air volumes (4.86 ± 4.35cc) as compared to group 1 (27.59 ± 17.80 cc, p=0.0083*). The duration of surgery, however, was significantly longer for group 1 (435 ± 56.05 min) as compared to group 2 (316 ± 34.79 min,p=0.00015*).The time span between the conclusion of the operation and postoperative 3DCT was similar for both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This new and simple burr hole technique was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative intracranial air. Reduction of intracranial air will ultimately reduce brain shift. That total operation time does not influence intracranial air is discussed as well as the limitations of this pilot series. In the authors' opinion, this straightforward and cost-effective technique has the potential to reduce brain shift and to increase DBS placement accuracy during functional stereotactic neurosurgical procedures performed in the seated or half-sitting position. A larger more standardized patient series is necessary to substantiate the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51241,"journal":{"name":"Central European Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1279748","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1279748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

Background: Exact stereotactic placement of deep brain stimulation electrodes during functional stereotactic neurosurgical procedures can be impeded by intraoperative brain shift. Brain shift has been shown to correlate with the amount of intracranial (subdural) air detected on early postoperative imaging studies. We report a simple burr hole technique that reduces the loss of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and has the potential to significantly reduce the amount of postoperative intracranial air.

Material and methods: A total of 16 patients were studied with half (group 2) receiving the burr hole technique designed to seal the CSF space and thereby reducing CSF loss. The other 8 patients (group 1) received the standard burr hole technique. The 2 groups were of similar age, gender, diagnosis (Parkinson's disease, n=14; cervical dystonia n=2), and surgical targets. All patients received bilateral electrodes either in the subthalamic nucleus (STN, n=14) or in the globus pallidum internus (GPi, n=2) avoiding transventricular trajectories. Early postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) was used to check for possible bleeding, DBS lead location, and the amount of intracranial air. Intracranial air was assessed manually in a volumetric slice-by-slice approach in the individual postoperative CT and the groups compared by t-test.

Results: Group 2 showed significantly lower postoperative intracranial air volumes (4.86 ± 4.35cc) as compared to group 1 (27.59 ± 17.80 cc, p=0.0083*). The duration of surgery, however, was significantly longer for group 1 (435 ± 56.05 min) as compared to group 2 (316 ± 34.79 min,p=0.00015*).The time span between the conclusion of the operation and postoperative 3DCT was similar for both groups.

Conclusion: This new and simple burr hole technique was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative intracranial air. Reduction of intracranial air will ultimately reduce brain shift. That total operation time does not influence intracranial air is discussed as well as the limitations of this pilot series. In the authors' opinion, this straightforward and cost-effective technique has the potential to reduce brain shift and to increase DBS placement accuracy during functional stereotactic neurosurgical procedures performed in the seated or half-sitting position. A larger more standardized patient series is necessary to substantiate the findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在功能性神经外科手术过程中减少脑移位-一种简单的钻孔技术,可以减少脑脊液损失和颅内空气。
背景:在功能性立体定向神经外科手术过程中,准确的立体定向放置深部脑刺激电极可能会受到术中脑转移的阻碍。脑转移已被证明与术后早期影像学检测到的颅内(硬膜下)空气量相关。我们报告了一种简单的钻孔技术,可以减少脑脊液(CSF)的流失,并有可能显著减少术后颅内空气量。材料和方法:共16例患者进行研究,其中一半(2组)接受钻孔技术,旨在封闭脑脊液空间,从而减少脑脊液损失。另外8例患者(第一组)采用标准毛刺钻孔技术。两组年龄、性别、诊断相近(帕金森病,n=14;宫颈肌张力障碍n=2)和手术目标。所有患者均在丘脑下核(STN, n=14)或内白球(GPi, n=2)接受双侧电极,避免经心室轨迹。术后早期采用三维计算机断层扫描(3D CT)检查是否可能出血、DBS导联位置及颅内空气量。在单个术后CT中,采用逐层容积法手动评估颅内空气,组间比较采用t检验。结果:2组术后颅内空气容量(4.86±4.35cc)明显低于1组(27.59±17.80 cc, p=0.0083*)。手术时间1组(435±56.05 min)明显长于2组(316±34.79 min,p=0.00015*)。两组手术结束至术后3DCT时间跨度相似。结论:这种新的、简单的钻孔技术可显著减少术后颅内空气。减少颅内空气将最终减少脑移位。总手术时间不影响颅内空气的讨论,以及该试点系列的局限性。在作者看来,这种简单且经济有效的技术有可能在坐着或半坐着的位置进行功能性立体定向神经外科手术时减少脑移位并提高DBS放置的准确性。需要更大规模、更标准化的患者系列来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Neurosurgery
Central European Neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Elevated intracranial pressure, low cerebral perfusion pressure, and impaired brain metabolism correlate with fatal outcome after severe brain injury. WHO Grade III Anaplastic Meningioma Metastasizing to the Parotid Gland and the Lungs: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Intracranial melanotic schwannoma: a case report of recurrence with extra- and intradural manifestation two decades after initial diagnosis and treatment. Cervical pneumorrhachis caused by impact loading forces after skull base fracture: case report and review of the literature. Training microneurosurgery - four years experiences with an in vivo model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1