Self-reported oral health status of adults resident in Medway, Kent in 2009.

Allan Pau, Christopher D Allen
{"title":"Self-reported oral health status of adults resident in Medway, Kent in 2009.","authors":"Allan Pau,&nbsp;Christopher D Allen","doi":"10.1308/135576111797512748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In order to assess the oral health status, oral behaviours and use of oral healthcare services of the adult population of Medway (Kent) in 2009, NHS Medway commissioned an assessment. Its aims were to understand oral health and impacts, behaviours and the use of dental services in order to inform future development of dental services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-reported postal questionnaire survey using relevant questions from the 1998 national Adult Dental Health Survey (ADHS) was performed. A stratified sample was drawn from all those aged 16 years and over, living in Medway and registered with a general medical practice. Stratification was into the three areas within Medway (Chatham, Gillingham and Rainham, and Rochester and Strood). Where appropriate, respondents answered the questions using a five-point Likert scale. The resulting data were analysed by area of domicile, age, gender, and deprivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight thousand questionnaires were sent out, of which 3101 (39%) were returned. Because of this low response and the need to weight responses to represent the distribution of the Medway population, this investigation must be considered as a service evaluation rather than a research project. Of respondents, 4% were edentate, 16% had 1-20 teeth, and 80% had 21 or more teeth. Fifty-one per cent of respondents reported at least one oral health impact; most commonly this was physical pain and psychological discomfort; least commonly, social disability and handicap. Sixteen per cent reported that their last dental visit was over 24 months ago and 31% reported that they attended only when in trouble or never (most commonly, because of anxiety and cost). There were marked variations in oral health status and use of dental services between those living in the most and least deprived areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>• Medway adults were more likely than the 2009 national ADHS respondents to be dentate but less likely to have 21 or more teeth. •Oral health impacts have been substantial, especially the experience of physical pain. •Proportionately more people than the 2009 national ADHS respondents reported attending a dentist in the previous 24 months. The most common reasons for non-attendance were anxiety and cost. •These findings have implications for the future development of the Medway oral health strategy and for all those working in primary care dentistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":79454,"journal":{"name":"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)","volume":"18 4","pages":"173-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1308/135576111797512748","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/135576111797512748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim: In order to assess the oral health status, oral behaviours and use of oral healthcare services of the adult population of Medway (Kent) in 2009, NHS Medway commissioned an assessment. Its aims were to understand oral health and impacts, behaviours and the use of dental services in order to inform future development of dental services.

Methods: A self-reported postal questionnaire survey using relevant questions from the 1998 national Adult Dental Health Survey (ADHS) was performed. A stratified sample was drawn from all those aged 16 years and over, living in Medway and registered with a general medical practice. Stratification was into the three areas within Medway (Chatham, Gillingham and Rainham, and Rochester and Strood). Where appropriate, respondents answered the questions using a five-point Likert scale. The resulting data were analysed by area of domicile, age, gender, and deprivation.

Results: Eight thousand questionnaires were sent out, of which 3101 (39%) were returned. Because of this low response and the need to weight responses to represent the distribution of the Medway population, this investigation must be considered as a service evaluation rather than a research project. Of respondents, 4% were edentate, 16% had 1-20 teeth, and 80% had 21 or more teeth. Fifty-one per cent of respondents reported at least one oral health impact; most commonly this was physical pain and psychological discomfort; least commonly, social disability and handicap. Sixteen per cent reported that their last dental visit was over 24 months ago and 31% reported that they attended only when in trouble or never (most commonly, because of anxiety and cost). There were marked variations in oral health status and use of dental services between those living in the most and least deprived areas.

Conclusions: • Medway adults were more likely than the 2009 national ADHS respondents to be dentate but less likely to have 21 or more teeth. •Oral health impacts have been substantial, especially the experience of physical pain. •Proportionately more people than the 2009 national ADHS respondents reported attending a dentist in the previous 24 months. The most common reasons for non-attendance were anxiety and cost. •These findings have implications for the future development of the Medway oral health strategy and for all those working in primary care dentistry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2009年肯特郡梅德韦市成年人口腔健康状况自我报告
目的:为了评估2009年肯特郡梅德韦郡成人口腔健康状况、口腔行为和口腔保健服务的使用情况,NHS委托梅德韦郡进行了一项评估。其目的是了解口腔健康及其影响、行为和牙科服务的使用情况,以便为牙科服务的未来发展提供信息。方法:采用1998年全国成人口腔健康调查(ADHS)的相关问题进行邮寄自填问卷调查。从居住在Medway并在普通医疗机构注册的所有16岁及以上的人中抽取分层样本。分层是在梅德韦的三个地区(查塔姆,吉林厄姆和雷纳姆,罗切斯特和斯特罗德)。在适当的情况下,受访者使用五点李克特量表回答问题。所得数据按居住地区、年龄、性别和贫困程度进行分析。结果:共发放问卷8000份,回收问卷3101份(39%)。由于这种低反应和需要加权反应来代表梅德韦人口的分布,这项调查必须被视为一项服务评估,而不是一项研究项目。在受访者中,4%是无齿的,16%有1-20颗牙齿,80%有21颗或更多的牙齿。51%的答复者报告了至少一项口腔健康影响;最常见的是身体疼痛和心理不适;最不常见的是社会残疾和障碍。16%的人报告说,他们最后一次看牙医是在24个月前,31%的人报告说,他们只有在遇到麻烦的时候才去看牙医,或者从来没有去看牙医(最常见的原因是焦虑和费用)。生活在最贫困地区和最贫困地区的人在口腔健康状况和使用牙科服务方面存在显著差异。结论:Medway成年人比2009年全国ADHS调查对象更有可能有牙齿,但不太可能有21颗或更多的牙齿。•对口腔健康的影响是巨大的,特别是对身体疼痛的体验。•与2009年全国ADHS调查对象相比,报告在过去24个月内看过牙医的人数比例更高。不出席的最常见原因是焦虑和费用。•这些发现对Medway口腔健康策略的未来发展和所有从事初级保健牙科工作的人都有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK) at 20 years. A patient's view of dentistry 20 years ago, now, and in 20 years' time. Primary Dental Care: past, present and future. Primary dental care: time to revise the definition? Prim Dent Care 2000. 7(3):93-96. Dental specialist lists: are they necessary?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1