Collaborative assessment and management of suicidality method shows effect.

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-08-01
Ann Colleen Nielsen, Francisco Alberdi, Bent Rosenbaum
{"title":"Collaborative assessment and management of suicidality method shows effect.","authors":"Ann Colleen Nielsen,&nbsp;Francisco Alberdi,&nbsp;Bent Rosenbaum","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous studies confirm the effect of collaborative assessment and management of suicidality (CAMS) in an experimental setup, but there is a need to test CAMS with regard to its effectiveness and feasibility in a real-life clinical context. The purpose of this study was to investigate CAMS in a Danish population in such a context.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In the present descriptive study, CAMS treatment was administered to a total of 42 patients referred during 1 August 2008 to 30 September 2009 to The Centre of Excellence in Suicide Prevention due to suicidal thoughts or a suicide attempt. Qualitative and quantitative data were obtained before and after CAMS treatment. Five major suicidal markers were regularly assessed. The patients' experiences of the importance of the treatment were studied as endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81% of the patients completed treatment and 68% hereof completed the final evaluation. 74% from this group judged the sessions to be the main factor in the elimination of their suicidality. A significant decrease was observed in the five suicidal markers recorded for the 42 patients included. One patient attempted suicide and another patient committed suicide.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAMS was assessed to be effective and useful in a real-life clinical context. Further studies in larger patient populations are needed as are studies to determine whether the CAMS method may be applied with equal effect to all patient groups.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>not relevant.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Danish Data Protection Agency.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 8","pages":"A4300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Previous studies confirm the effect of collaborative assessment and management of suicidality (CAMS) in an experimental setup, but there is a need to test CAMS with regard to its effectiveness and feasibility in a real-life clinical context. The purpose of this study was to investigate CAMS in a Danish population in such a context.

Material and methods: In the present descriptive study, CAMS treatment was administered to a total of 42 patients referred during 1 August 2008 to 30 September 2009 to The Centre of Excellence in Suicide Prevention due to suicidal thoughts or a suicide attempt. Qualitative and quantitative data were obtained before and after CAMS treatment. Five major suicidal markers were regularly assessed. The patients' experiences of the importance of the treatment were studied as endpoints.

Results: A total of 81% of the patients completed treatment and 68% hereof completed the final evaluation. 74% from this group judged the sessions to be the main factor in the elimination of their suicidality. A significant decrease was observed in the five suicidal markers recorded for the 42 patients included. One patient attempted suicide and another patient committed suicide.

Conclusion: CAMS was assessed to be effective and useful in a real-life clinical context. Further studies in larger patient populations are needed as are studies to determine whether the CAMS method may be applied with equal effect to all patient groups.

Funding: not relevant.

Trial registration: Danish Data Protection Agency.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协同评估与管理自杀方法效果明显。
先前的研究在实验设置中证实了协作评估和管理自杀(CAMS)的效果,但需要在现实临床环境中测试CAMS的有效性和可行性。本研究的目的是在这样的背景下调查丹麦人群的CAMS。材料和方法:在本描述性研究中,在2008年8月1日至2009年9月30日期间,共有42名因自杀念头或自杀企图而被转介到自杀预防卓越中心的患者接受CAMS治疗。获得CAMS治疗前后的定性和定量数据。定期评估五种主要自杀标志。患者对治疗重要性的体验作为终点进行研究。结果:共有81%的患者完成了治疗,68%的患者完成了最终评估。这一群体中74%的人认为这些课程是消除他们自杀倾向的主要因素。42例患者的5项自杀指标均有显著下降。一名患者企图自杀,另一名患者自杀。结论:CAMS在现实临床环境中被评估为有效和有用的。需要在更大的患者群体中进行进一步的研究,以确定CAMS方法是否可以对所有患者群体具有相同的效果。资金:不相关。试验注册:丹麦数据保护局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of new advances in sex research on psychoanalytic theory. Global Mental Health : Anthropological Perspectives Cancer rates after kidney transplantation. Need for thyroidectomy in patients treated with radioactive iodide for benign thyroid disease. Stagnation in body mass index in Denmark from 1997/1998 to 2004/2005, but with geographical diversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1