Stagnation in body mass index in Denmark from 1997/1998 to 2004/2005, but with geographical diversity.

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-12-01
Mathilde Svendstrup, Nils Jacob Knudsen, Torben Jørgensen, Lone Banke Rasmussen, Lars Ovesen, Hans Perrild, Peter Laurberg
{"title":"Stagnation in body mass index in Denmark from 1997/1998 to 2004/2005, but with geographical diversity.","authors":"Mathilde Svendstrup,&nbsp;Nils Jacob Knudsen,&nbsp;Torben Jørgensen,&nbsp;Lone Banke Rasmussen,&nbsp;Lars Ovesen,&nbsp;Hans Perrild,&nbsp;Peter Laurberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We analyzed the trend in body mass index (BMI) as well as in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among Danish adults, mainly women, from 1997/1998 to 2004/2005 and evaluated any regional differences.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data were drawn from two cross-sectional population-based studies conducted in parallel in Aalborg and Copenhagen from 1997/1998 and 2004/2005. Height and weight were measured in a total of 7,487 participants in the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the total cohort, we found no significant difference in BMI from 1997/1998 to 2004/2005 (p = 0.828). There was an increase in BMI in Aalborg of 0.32 (p = 0.030), while in Copenhagen we observed a statistically significant decrease in BMI of 0.30 (p = 0.017). The difference in change over time in BMI between the two regions was significant (p = 0.002). Also the difference in the trend in prevalence of overweight and obesity was statistically significant between the two cities (p = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that the obesity epidemic is leveling off - at least among women - and that it may even be receding in Copenhagen. Nevertheless, the absolute average BMI values and the prevalence of overweight and obesity in both cities are high which underlines the need for further initiatives to prevent obesity-related health risks in the future.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The DanThyr studies were supported by funding from the Tømmerhandler Vilhelm Bang Foundation, the Copenhagen Corporation Research Foundation, the 1991 Pharmacy Foundation, the Danish Medical Foundation, the Health Insurance Foundation, the Agnes and Knut Mørk Foundation, the Wedel Wedelsborg Foundation, the Ortho-Clinical Foundation and BRAHMS Diagnostica.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 12","pages":"A4344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We analyzed the trend in body mass index (BMI) as well as in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among Danish adults, mainly women, from 1997/1998 to 2004/2005 and evaluated any regional differences.

Material and methods: Data were drawn from two cross-sectional population-based studies conducted in parallel in Aalborg and Copenhagen from 1997/1998 and 2004/2005. Height and weight were measured in a total of 7,487 participants in the two cohorts.

Results: In the total cohort, we found no significant difference in BMI from 1997/1998 to 2004/2005 (p = 0.828). There was an increase in BMI in Aalborg of 0.32 (p = 0.030), while in Copenhagen we observed a statistically significant decrease in BMI of 0.30 (p = 0.017). The difference in change over time in BMI between the two regions was significant (p = 0.002). Also the difference in the trend in prevalence of overweight and obesity was statistically significant between the two cities (p = 0.010).

Conclusion: Our results indicate that the obesity epidemic is leveling off - at least among women - and that it may even be receding in Copenhagen. Nevertheless, the absolute average BMI values and the prevalence of overweight and obesity in both cities are high which underlines the need for further initiatives to prevent obesity-related health risks in the future.

Funding: The DanThyr studies were supported by funding from the Tømmerhandler Vilhelm Bang Foundation, the Copenhagen Corporation Research Foundation, the 1991 Pharmacy Foundation, the Danish Medical Foundation, the Health Insurance Foundation, the Agnes and Knut Mørk Foundation, the Wedel Wedelsborg Foundation, the Ortho-Clinical Foundation and BRAHMS Diagnostica.

Trial registration: not relevant.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从1997/1998年到2004/2005年,丹麦的身体质量指数停滞不前,但存在地域差异。
前言:我们分析了1997/1998至2004/2005年间丹麦成年人(主要是女性)体重指数(BMI)以及超重和肥胖患病率的趋势,并评估了任何地区差异。材料和方法:数据来自1997/1998年和2004/2005年在奥尔堡和哥本哈根平行进行的两项基于人口的横断面研究。研究人员测量了两组共7487名参与者的身高和体重。结果:在整个队列中,我们发现1997/1998年与2004/2005年BMI无显著差异(p = 0.828)。奥尔堡的BMI增加了0.32 (p = 0.030),而哥本哈根的BMI下降了0.30 (p = 0.017),具有统计学意义。两个地区BMI随时间的变化差异显著(p = 0.002)。此外,两个城市在超重和肥胖患病率趋势上的差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.010)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,肥胖的流行趋势正在趋于平稳——至少在女性中是这样——在哥本哈根甚至可能正在消退。然而,这两个城市的绝对平均BMI值以及超重和肥胖的流行率都很高,这突显出未来需要采取进一步措施预防与肥胖相关的健康风险。资助:DanThyr的研究得到了Tømmerhandler Vilhelm Bang基金会、哥本哈根公司研究基金会、1991药房基金会、丹麦医学基金会、健康保险基金会、Agnes and Knut Mørk基金会、Wedel Wedelsborg基金会、Ortho-Clinical基金会和BRAHMS Diagnostica的资助。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of new advances in sex research on psychoanalytic theory. Global Mental Health : Anthropological Perspectives Cancer rates after kidney transplantation. Need for thyroidectomy in patients treated with radioactive iodide for benign thyroid disease. Stagnation in body mass index in Denmark from 1997/1998 to 2004/2005, but with geographical diversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1