The Upper and Lower Bounds of the Prediction Accuracies of Ensemble Methods for Binary Classification.

Xueyi Wang, Nicholas J Davidson
{"title":"The Upper and Lower Bounds of the Prediction Accuracies of Ensemble Methods for Binary Classification.","authors":"Xueyi Wang,&nbsp;Nicholas J Davidson","doi":"10.1109/ICMLA.2010.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ensemble methods have been widely used to improve prediction accuracy over individual classifiers. In this paper, we achieve a few results about the prediction accuracies of ensemble methods for binary classification that are missed or misinterpreted in previous literature. First we show the upper and lower bounds of the prediction accuracies (i.e. the best and worst possible prediction accuracies) of ensemble methods. Next we show that an ensemble method can achieve > 0.5 prediction accuracy, while individual classifiers have < 0.5 prediction accuracies. Furthermore, for individual classifiers with different prediction accuracies, the average of the individual accuracies determines the upper and lower bounds. We perform two experiments to verify the results and show that it is hard to achieve the upper and lower bounds accuracies by random individual classifiers and better algorithms need to be developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74528,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications. International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications","volume":" ","pages":"373-378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/ICMLA.2010.62","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications. International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2010.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Ensemble methods have been widely used to improve prediction accuracy over individual classifiers. In this paper, we achieve a few results about the prediction accuracies of ensemble methods for binary classification that are missed or misinterpreted in previous literature. First we show the upper and lower bounds of the prediction accuracies (i.e. the best and worst possible prediction accuracies) of ensemble methods. Next we show that an ensemble method can achieve > 0.5 prediction accuracy, while individual classifiers have < 0.5 prediction accuracies. Furthermore, for individual classifiers with different prediction accuracies, the average of the individual accuracies determines the upper and lower bounds. We perform two experiments to verify the results and show that it is hard to achieve the upper and lower bounds accuracies by random individual classifiers and better algorithms need to be developed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二元分类集成方法预测精度的上界和下界。
集成方法已被广泛用于提高单个分类器的预测精度。在本文中,我们获得了一些关于二元分类的集成方法的预测精度的结果,这些结果在以前的文献中被遗漏或误解。首先,我们展示了集合方法的预测精度的上界和下界(即最佳和最差的预测精度)。接下来,我们展示了集成方法可以达到> 0.5的预测精度,而单个分类器的预测精度< 0.5。此外,对于具有不同预测精度的单个分类器,单个精度的平均值决定了上下界。我们进行了两个实验来验证结果,并表明随机个体分类器很难达到上界和下界精度,需要开发更好的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sentiment-Driven Cryptocurrency Price Prediction: A Machine Learning Approach Utilizing Historical Data and Social Media Sentiment Analysis Face Mask Detection Model Using Convolutional Neural Network Breast Tumor Detection Using Efficient Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques Context-free Self-Conditioned GAN for Trajectory Forecasting Multiple Imputation via Generative Adversarial Network for High-dimensional Blockwise Missing Value Problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1