Farmer land-use decision-making from an instrumental and relational perspective

IF 6.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101303
Margaret Githinji , Meine van Noordwijk , Catherine Muthuri , Erika N. Speelman , Gert Jan Hofstede
{"title":"Farmer land-use decision-making from an instrumental and relational perspective","authors":"Margaret Githinji ,&nbsp;Meine van Noordwijk ,&nbsp;Catherine Muthuri ,&nbsp;Erika N. Speelman ,&nbsp;Gert Jan Hofstede","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Farmer decisions shape land-use systems, with consequences for a landscape’s economy, ecology, and the well-being of its inhabitants. These decisions are central in the management of natural resources as they may contribute to the tragedy of the commons, or ways to avoid it. Farmer decisions have been explained by several concepts and theories, including sociodemographic factors, expected utility theory, prospect theory, bounded rationality, and the theory of planned behavior as variations on goal-oriented (instrumental) decision-making. This review provides an analysis of each theory, in comparison with Kemper’s theory on status, power, and reference groups as a primarily social relation lens through which to understand decision-making. Combining relational and instrumental perspectives on decision-making may be key to understanding the emergence of collective action and avoidance of tragedy of the commons.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101303"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Farmer decisions shape land-use systems, with consequences for a landscape’s economy, ecology, and the well-being of its inhabitants. These decisions are central in the management of natural resources as they may contribute to the tragedy of the commons, or ways to avoid it. Farmer decisions have been explained by several concepts and theories, including sociodemographic factors, expected utility theory, prospect theory, bounded rationality, and the theory of planned behavior as variations on goal-oriented (instrumental) decision-making. This review provides an analysis of each theory, in comparison with Kemper’s theory on status, power, and reference groups as a primarily social relation lens through which to understand decision-making. Combining relational and instrumental perspectives on decision-making may be key to understanding the emergence of collective action and avoidance of tragedy of the commons.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于工具与关系视角的农民土地利用决策
农民的决定塑造了土地利用系统,对景观的经济、生态和居民的福祉产生了影响。这些决定是自然资源管理的核心,因为它们可能导致公地悲剧,或导致避免这种悲剧的方法。农民的决策可以用几个概念和理论来解释,包括社会人口因素、期望效用理论、前景理论、有限理性和计划行为理论,这些理论都是目标导向(工具)决策的变体。本综述对每一种理论进行了分析,并与肯珀关于地位、权力和参考群体的理论进行了比较,这些理论是理解决策的主要社会关系透镜。将决策的关系和工具观点结合起来,可能是理解集体行动的出现和避免公地悲剧的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.
期刊最新文献
The potential of social innovation to shift the limits to climate adaptation Greening container terminals through optimization: a systematic review on recent advances Advancing sustainable port development in the Western Indian Ocean region Adaptation constraints, limits and enabling conditions in small island developing states Three archetypical governance pathways for transformative change toward sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1