Jakub Smiechowicz, Barbara Barteczko, Małgorzata Grotowska, Teresa Kaiser, Stanisław Zieliński, Andrzej Kübler
{"title":"[Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome complicating type A (H1N1) influenza treated with extracorporeal CO2 removal].","authors":"Jakub Smiechowicz, Barbara Barteczko, Małgorzata Grotowska, Teresa Kaiser, Stanisław Zieliński, Andrzej Kübler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The influenza pandemic of 2009 was reported to be frequently associated with pulmonary complications, including ARDS. We report the case of a morbidly obese, 37-year-old, AH1N1-infected woman, who was admitted to a regional hospital because of rapidly progressing respiratory failure. She was treated successfully with high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and low-flow extracorporeal CO2 removal.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>The patient was admitted to a regional hospital because of severe viral infection, diabetes and hypertension that developed during pregnancy. On admission, she was deeply unconscious (GCS 5), hypotonic and anuric. Conventional ventilation, veno-venous haemofiltration, antibiotics and antiviral therapy (oseltamivir) did not improve the patient's condition, and she was transferred to a tertiary referral centre. Immediately before the transfer, she suffered two cardiac arrest episodes. They were successfully reversed. On admission, the patient was hypercapnic (PaCO2 150 mm Hg/20 kPa), acidotic (pH 6.92) and hyperkinetic (HR 120 min-1, CO 12.7 L min-1). Total lung compliance was 21 mL cm H2O-1, and SAP/DAP was 63/39 mm Hg). The PaO2/FIO2 index was 85. HFOV was instituted for 48 h, resulting in a marked improvement in gas exchange, however any manipulations caused immediate deterioration in the patient's condition. Extracorporeal CO2 removal was commenced and continued for 120 h, resulting in gradual improvement and eventual weaning from artificial ventilation after 17 days. Further treatment was complicated by septic shock due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of the vagina, treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. The patient eventually recovered and returned to her regional hospital after 24 days.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>During the 2009 pandemic, a high number of pulmonary complications were observed all over the world. Viral infections are especially difficult to treat and the CESAR study indicated that the use of ECMO or extracorporeal CO2 removal devices may result in a lower mortality when compared with standard therapy. We conclude that the use of a simple CO2 removal device can be beneficial in complicated cases of AH1N1 influenza.</p>","PeriodicalId":88221,"journal":{"name":"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia","volume":"43 2","pages":"98-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezjologia intensywna terapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The influenza pandemic of 2009 was reported to be frequently associated with pulmonary complications, including ARDS. We report the case of a morbidly obese, 37-year-old, AH1N1-infected woman, who was admitted to a regional hospital because of rapidly progressing respiratory failure. She was treated successfully with high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and low-flow extracorporeal CO2 removal.
Case report: The patient was admitted to a regional hospital because of severe viral infection, diabetes and hypertension that developed during pregnancy. On admission, she was deeply unconscious (GCS 5), hypotonic and anuric. Conventional ventilation, veno-venous haemofiltration, antibiotics and antiviral therapy (oseltamivir) did not improve the patient's condition, and she was transferred to a tertiary referral centre. Immediately before the transfer, she suffered two cardiac arrest episodes. They were successfully reversed. On admission, the patient was hypercapnic (PaCO2 150 mm Hg/20 kPa), acidotic (pH 6.92) and hyperkinetic (HR 120 min-1, CO 12.7 L min-1). Total lung compliance was 21 mL cm H2O-1, and SAP/DAP was 63/39 mm Hg). The PaO2/FIO2 index was 85. HFOV was instituted for 48 h, resulting in a marked improvement in gas exchange, however any manipulations caused immediate deterioration in the patient's condition. Extracorporeal CO2 removal was commenced and continued for 120 h, resulting in gradual improvement and eventual weaning from artificial ventilation after 17 days. Further treatment was complicated by septic shock due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of the vagina, treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. The patient eventually recovered and returned to her regional hospital after 24 days.
Discussion: During the 2009 pandemic, a high number of pulmonary complications were observed all over the world. Viral infections are especially difficult to treat and the CESAR study indicated that the use of ECMO or extracorporeal CO2 removal devices may result in a lower mortality when compared with standard therapy. We conclude that the use of a simple CO2 removal device can be beneficial in complicated cases of AH1N1 influenza.
背景:据报道,2009年流感大流行经常与肺部并发症相关,包括急性呼吸窘迫综合征。我们报告的情况下,病态肥胖,37岁,ah1n1感染的妇女,谁是住在一个地区医院,因为快速进展的呼吸衰竭。她通过高频振荡通气(HFOV)和低流量体外CO2去除成功治疗。病例报告:该患者因严重的病毒感染、妊娠期间出现的糖尿病和高血压被地区医院收治。入院时,患者深度昏迷(GCS 5),低渗且无尿。常规通气、静脉-静脉血液过滤、抗生素和抗病毒治疗(奥司他韦)没有改善患者的病情,她被转到三级转诊中心。在转移之前,她曾两次心脏骤停。它们被成功地逆转了。入院时,患者高碳酸血症(PaCO2 150 mm Hg/20 kPa),酸中毒(pH 6.92)和高运动(HR 120 min-1, CO 12.7 L min-1)。肺总顺应性为21 mL cm H2O-1, SAP/DAP为63/39 mm Hg)。PaO2/FIO2指数为85。HFOV设置48小时,导致气体交换明显改善,然而任何操作都会导致患者病情立即恶化。开始体外CO2去除并持续120小时,结果逐渐改善,并在17天后最终脱离人工通气。进一步治疗并发铜绿假单胞菌阴道感染感染性休克,使用哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗。患者最终康复,并在24天后回到了她所在的地区医院。讨论:在2009年大流行期间,世界各地观察到大量肺部并发症。病毒感染尤其难以治疗,CESAR研究表明,与标准治疗相比,使用ECMO或体外CO2去除装置可能导致更低的死亡率。我们的结论是,在复杂的甲型h1n1流感病例中,使用简单的二氧化碳去除装置可能是有益的。