Nurse-administered early warning score system can be used for emergency department triage.

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-06-01
Dorthea Christensen, Nanna Martin Jensen, Rikke Maaløe, Søren Steemann Rudolph, Bo Belhage, Hans Perrild
{"title":"Nurse-administered early warning score system can be used for emergency department triage.","authors":"Dorthea Christensen,&nbsp;Nanna Martin Jensen,&nbsp;Rikke Maaløe,&nbsp;Søren Steemann Rudolph,&nbsp;Bo Belhage,&nbsp;Hans Perrild","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies have shown that early warning score systems can identify in-patients at high risk of catastrophic deterioration and this may possibly be used for an emergency department (ED) triage. Bispebjerg Hospital has introduced a multidisciplinary team (MT) in the ED activated by the Bispebjerg Early Warning Score (BEWS). The BEWS is calculated on the basis of respiratory frequency, pulse, systolic blood pressure, temperature and level of consciousness. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability of the BEWS to identify critically ill patients in the ED and to examine the feasibility of using the BEWS to activate an MT response.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study is based on an evaluation of retrospective data from a random sample of 300 emergency patients. On the basis of documented vital signs, a BEWS was calculated retrospectively. The primary end points were admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and death within 48 hours of arrival at the ED. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01243021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A BEWS ≥ 5 is associated with a significantly increased risk of ICU admission within 48 hours of arrival (relative risk (RR) 4.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-10.9) and death within 48 hours of arrival (RR 20.3; 95% CI 6.9-60.1). The sensitivity of the BEWS in identifying patients who were admitted to the ICU or who died within 48 hours of arrival was 63%. The positive predictive value of the BEWS was 16% and the negative predictive value 98% for identification of patients who were admitted to the ICU or who died within 48 hours of arrival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BEWS is a simple scoring system based on readily available vital signs. It is a sensitive tool for detecting critically ill patients and may be used for ED triage and activation of an MT response.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 6","pages":"A4221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have shown that early warning score systems can identify in-patients at high risk of catastrophic deterioration and this may possibly be used for an emergency department (ED) triage. Bispebjerg Hospital has introduced a multidisciplinary team (MT) in the ED activated by the Bispebjerg Early Warning Score (BEWS). The BEWS is calculated on the basis of respiratory frequency, pulse, systolic blood pressure, temperature and level of consciousness. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability of the BEWS to identify critically ill patients in the ED and to examine the feasibility of using the BEWS to activate an MT response.

Material and methods: This study is based on an evaluation of retrospective data from a random sample of 300 emergency patients. On the basis of documented vital signs, a BEWS was calculated retrospectively. The primary end points were admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and death within 48 hours of arrival at the ED. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01243021).

Results: A BEWS ≥ 5 is associated with a significantly increased risk of ICU admission within 48 hours of arrival (relative risk (RR) 4.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-10.9) and death within 48 hours of arrival (RR 20.3; 95% CI 6.9-60.1). The sensitivity of the BEWS in identifying patients who were admitted to the ICU or who died within 48 hours of arrival was 63%. The positive predictive value of the BEWS was 16% and the negative predictive value 98% for identification of patients who were admitted to the ICU or who died within 48 hours of arrival.

Conclusion: The BEWS is a simple scoring system based on readily available vital signs. It is a sensitive tool for detecting critically ill patients and may be used for ED triage and activation of an MT response.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士管理的早期预警评分系统可用于急诊科分诊。
研究表明,早期预警评分系统可以识别出处于灾难性恶化高风险的住院患者,这可能用于急诊科(ED)分诊。比斯贝尔格医院在由比斯贝尔格早期预警评分(BEWS)激活的急诊科引入了一个多学科团队(MT)。BEWS是根据呼吸频率、脉搏、收缩压、体温和意识水平计算的。本研究的目的是评估BEWS识别急诊科危重患者的能力,并研究使用BEWS激活MT反应的可行性。材料和方法:本研究基于对300名急诊患者随机抽样的回顾性资料的评估。根据记录的生命体征,回顾性计算BEWS。主要终点是入住重症监护病房(ICU)和到达ED后48小时内死亡。该研究已在clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT01243021)。结果:BEWS≥5与到达后48小时内入住ICU的风险显著增加相关(相对风险(RR) 4.1;95%可信区间(CI) 1.5-10.9)和到达48小时内死亡(RR 20.3;95% ci 6.9-60.1)。BEWS在识别入住ICU的患者或到达后48小时内死亡的患者方面的敏感性为63%。BEWS阳性预测值为16%,阴性预测值为98%,用于识别入住ICU的患者或到达后48小时内死亡的患者。结论:BEWS是一种简单的基于生命体征的评分系统。它是一种检测危重病人的敏感工具,可用于ED分诊和MT反应的激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of new advances in sex research on psychoanalytic theory. Global Mental Health : Anthropological Perspectives Cancer rates after kidney transplantation. Need for thyroidectomy in patients treated with radioactive iodide for benign thyroid disease. Stagnation in body mass index in Denmark from 1997/1998 to 2004/2005, but with geographical diversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1