Multi-dose drug dispensing is a challenge across the primary-secondary care interface.

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-12-01
Lene Orskov Reuther, Charlotte Lysen, Mette Faxholm, Lena Salomon, Carsten Hendriksen
{"title":"Multi-dose drug dispensing is a challenge across the primary-secondary care interface.","authors":"Lene Orskov Reuther,&nbsp;Charlotte Lysen,&nbsp;Mette Faxholm,&nbsp;Lena Salomon,&nbsp;Carsten Hendriksen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multi-dose drug dispensing (MDDD) signifies that the patient's medicine is packed in disposable bags corresponding to the dose that should be taken. The purpose of the present study was to investigate how a hospital MDDD instruction was followed.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All patients receiving MDDD on admission to the acute medical admission ward at Bispebjerg Hospital in the period from 1 January to 30 June 2010 were prospectively included in the study. An audit of the medication lists and hospital case records covering the period from admission to discharge was performed. A proportion of patients received a post-discharge home visit. An interview in both sectors was carried out to determine whether the instructions had been followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost 9% of the patients were receiving MDDD on admission. Information on MDDD was recorded in the physician case record for 3.4% of the patients and in the nurse case record for 12.9% of the patients. Changes in MDDD during hospitalization were made for 58.3% of the patients. General practitioners and/or the community pharmacy were notified of changes in MDDD at discharge for 13.6% of the patients. The post-discharge visits and the interview revealed potential issues of concern regarding patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MDDD is frequent. Identification and registration of MDDD is only performed sporadically. Changes in MDDD are frequent, but they are rarely accompanied by information to the general practitioner or the community pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The project was partly funded by the Ministry of Health and Prevention 2009.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 12","pages":"A4341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Multi-dose drug dispensing (MDDD) signifies that the patient's medicine is packed in disposable bags corresponding to the dose that should be taken. The purpose of the present study was to investigate how a hospital MDDD instruction was followed.

Material and methods: All patients receiving MDDD on admission to the acute medical admission ward at Bispebjerg Hospital in the period from 1 January to 30 June 2010 were prospectively included in the study. An audit of the medication lists and hospital case records covering the period from admission to discharge was performed. A proportion of patients received a post-discharge home visit. An interview in both sectors was carried out to determine whether the instructions had been followed.

Results: Almost 9% of the patients were receiving MDDD on admission. Information on MDDD was recorded in the physician case record for 3.4% of the patients and in the nurse case record for 12.9% of the patients. Changes in MDDD during hospitalization were made for 58.3% of the patients. General practitioners and/or the community pharmacy were notified of changes in MDDD at discharge for 13.6% of the patients. The post-discharge visits and the interview revealed potential issues of concern regarding patient safety.

Conclusion: MDDD is frequent. Identification and registration of MDDD is only performed sporadically. Changes in MDDD are frequent, but they are rarely accompanied by information to the general practitioner or the community pharmacy.

Funding: The project was partly funded by the Ministry of Health and Prevention 2009.

Trial registration: The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多剂量药物调剂是整个初级和二级保健界面的一个挑战。
多剂量药物调剂(MDDD)是指患者的药物被包装在与应服用剂量相对应的一次性袋中。本研究旨在探讨医院MDDD的执行情况。材料和方法:2010年1月1日至6月30日期间,所有在比斯堡医院急症住院病房接受MDDD治疗的患者被前瞻性纳入研究。对从入院到出院期间的药物清单和医院病例记录进行了审计。一定比例的患者接受出院后家访。在这两个部门进行了一次面谈,以确定指示是否得到遵守。结果:近9%的患者在入院时接受MDDD治疗。3.4%的患者在医生病例记录中记录了MDDD信息,12.9%的患者在护士病例记录中记录了MDDD信息。住院期间MDDD发生变化的患者占58.3%。13.6%的患者出院时,全科医生和/或社区药房被告知MDDD的变化。出院后访问和访谈揭示了患者安全方面的潜在问题。结论:MDDD较为常见。MDDD的识别和注册只是偶尔进行。MDDD的变化是频繁的,但它们很少伴随向全科医生或社区药房的信息。资金:该项目部分资金由2009年卫生和预防部提供。试验注册:该研究已获得丹麦数据保护局的批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of new advances in sex research on psychoanalytic theory. Global Mental Health : Anthropological Perspectives Cancer rates after kidney transplantation. Need for thyroidectomy in patients treated with radioactive iodide for benign thyroid disease. Stagnation in body mass index in Denmark from 1997/1998 to 2004/2005, but with geographical diversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1