Etomidate and mortality in cirrhotic patients with septic shock.

Antoine J Cherfan, Hani M Tamim, Abdulrahman AlJumah, Asgar H Rishu, Abdulmajeed Al-Abdulkareem, Bandar A Al Knawy, Ali Hajeer, Waleed Tamimi, Riette Brits, Yaseen M Arabi
{"title":"Etomidate and mortality in cirrhotic patients with septic shock.","authors":"Antoine J Cherfan,&nbsp;Hani M Tamim,&nbsp;Abdulrahman AlJumah,&nbsp;Asgar H Rishu,&nbsp;Abdulmajeed Al-Abdulkareem,&nbsp;Bandar A Al Knawy,&nbsp;Ali Hajeer,&nbsp;Waleed Tamimi,&nbsp;Riette Brits,&nbsp;Yaseen M Arabi","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-11-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical effects and outcomes of a single dose etomidate prior to intubation in the intensive care setting is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of a single dose effect of etomidate prior to intubation on the mortality of septic cirrhotic patients and the impact of the subsequent use of low dose hydrocortisone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a nested-cohort study within a randomized double blind placebo controlled study evaluating the use of low dose hydrocortisone in cirrhotic septic patients. Cirrhotic septic patients ≥ 18 years were included in the study. Patients who received etomidate prior to intubation were compared to those who did not receive etomidate for all cause 28-day mortality as a primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty two intubated patients out of the 75 patients randomized in the initial trial were eligible for this study. Twenty three of the 62 intubated patients received etomidate dose prior to intubation. Etomidate use was not associated with all cause 28-day mortality or hospital mortality but was associated with significantly higher ICU mortality (91% vs. 64% for etomidate and controls groups, respectively; p = 0.02). Etomidate patients who received subsequent doses of hydrocortisone required lower doses of vasopressors and had more vasopressor-free days but no improvement in mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this group of septic cirrhotic patients with very high mortality, etomidate increased ICU mortality. Subsequent use of hydrocortisone appears to have no benefit beyond decreasing vasopressor requirements. The lowest mortality was observed in patients who did not receive etomidate but received hydrocortisone.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"11 ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-11-22","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-11-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Background: Clinical effects and outcomes of a single dose etomidate prior to intubation in the intensive care setting is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of a single dose effect of etomidate prior to intubation on the mortality of septic cirrhotic patients and the impact of the subsequent use of low dose hydrocortisone.

Methods: This is a nested-cohort study within a randomized double blind placebo controlled study evaluating the use of low dose hydrocortisone in cirrhotic septic patients. Cirrhotic septic patients ≥ 18 years were included in the study. Patients who received etomidate prior to intubation were compared to those who did not receive etomidate for all cause 28-day mortality as a primary outcome.

Results: Sixty two intubated patients out of the 75 patients randomized in the initial trial were eligible for this study. Twenty three of the 62 intubated patients received etomidate dose prior to intubation. Etomidate use was not associated with all cause 28-day mortality or hospital mortality but was associated with significantly higher ICU mortality (91% vs. 64% for etomidate and controls groups, respectively; p = 0.02). Etomidate patients who received subsequent doses of hydrocortisone required lower doses of vasopressors and had more vasopressor-free days but no improvement in mortality.

Conclusions: In this group of septic cirrhotic patients with very high mortality, etomidate increased ICU mortality. Subsequent use of hydrocortisone appears to have no benefit beyond decreasing vasopressor requirements. The lowest mortality was observed in patients who did not receive etomidate but received hydrocortisone.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
依托咪酯与肝硬化脓毒性休克患者死亡率的关系。
背景:在重症监护室插管前单剂量依托咪酯的临床效果和结果是有争议的。本研究的目的是评估插管前单剂量依托咪酯对脓毒性肝硬化患者死亡率的影响,以及随后使用低剂量氢化可的松的影响。方法:这是一项随机双盲安慰剂对照研究中的巢式队列研究,评估低剂量氢化可的松在肝硬化脓毒症患者中的应用。≥18岁的肝硬化脓毒症患者被纳入研究。插管前接受依托咪酯治疗的患者与未接受依托咪酯治疗的患者比较全因28天死亡率作为主要结局。结果:初始试验中随机分配的75例插管患者中有62例符合本研究的条件。62例插管患者中有23例插管前给予依托咪酯剂量。使用依托咪酯与全因28天死亡率或住院死亡率无关,但与ICU死亡率显著升高相关(依托咪酯组和对照组分别为91%和64%;P = 0.02)。依咪酯患者接受后续剂量的氢化可的松需要较低剂量的血管加压剂,并且有更多的无血管加压剂天数,但死亡率没有改善。结论:在这组死亡率很高的脓毒性肝硬化患者中,依托咪酯增加了ICU死亡率。后续使用氢化可的松似乎除了降低血管加压素的需要量外没有其他益处。未使用依托咪酯但使用氢化可的松的患者死亡率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statin therapy in critical illness: an international survey of intensive care physicians' opinions, attitudes and practice. Correction: Adverse drug reactions to antiretroviral therapy (ARVs): incidence, type and risk factors in Nigeria Data for drugs available through low-cost prescription drug programs are available through pharmacy benefit manager and claims data. Population prevalence of high dose paracetamol in dispensed paracetamol/opioid prescription combinations: an observational study. Adherence to medication for the treatment of psychosis: rates and risk factors in an Ethiopian population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1