{"title":"Health policy and the community safety net for individuals with intellectual disability","authors":"Harold A. Pollack","doi":"10.1002/ddrr.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores social policy developments in the arena of intellectual and developmental disabilities. It begins by summarizing the challenges facing persons with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers in 1945. Families depended on a patchwork of over-crowded and under-funded large state institutions. Children with intellectual disabilities were marginalized from education and public services. Shame and stigma, along with the lack of community-based services, led many parents to institutionalize a child. The federal government provided almost no specific assistance for disabled individuals or to their families. Postwar America provided fertile ground for parents to act collectively through the emergence of the National Association of Retarded Children (NARC). Partly as a consequence of such organizing, the 1950s marked a surprising turning-point, in which the federal government expanded income support to disabled persons through measures such as Social Security's “Disabled Adult Child” program and, by the early 1970s, the advent of Supplemental Security Income (SSI). It also reviews the growth of Medicaid as the dominant payer of medical and social services at the boundaries between personal medical services, case management, education, and other social services. The article ends by summarizing current challenges in intellectual disability policy. It notes that the size, complexity, and expense of I/DD services poses inherent challenges, particularly to state and local governments in the current recession. Adjusting for inflation, 23 states actually reduced real spending on I/DD services between 2008 and 2009. Controlling for local conditions, politically conservative states enacted deeper cuts and spent a smaller fraction of state income on intellectual disability services than other states. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2011; 17:44–51.</p>","PeriodicalId":55176,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","volume":"17 1","pages":"44-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ddrr.138","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ddrr.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
This article explores social policy developments in the arena of intellectual and developmental disabilities. It begins by summarizing the challenges facing persons with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers in 1945. Families depended on a patchwork of over-crowded and under-funded large state institutions. Children with intellectual disabilities were marginalized from education and public services. Shame and stigma, along with the lack of community-based services, led many parents to institutionalize a child. The federal government provided almost no specific assistance for disabled individuals or to their families. Postwar America provided fertile ground for parents to act collectively through the emergence of the National Association of Retarded Children (NARC). Partly as a consequence of such organizing, the 1950s marked a surprising turning-point, in which the federal government expanded income support to disabled persons through measures such as Social Security's “Disabled Adult Child” program and, by the early 1970s, the advent of Supplemental Security Income (SSI). It also reviews the growth of Medicaid as the dominant payer of medical and social services at the boundaries between personal medical services, case management, education, and other social services. The article ends by summarizing current challenges in intellectual disability policy. It notes that the size, complexity, and expense of I/DD services poses inherent challenges, particularly to state and local governments in the current recession. Adjusting for inflation, 23 states actually reduced real spending on I/DD services between 2008 and 2009. Controlling for local conditions, politically conservative states enacted deeper cuts and spent a smaller fraction of state income on intellectual disability services than other states. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2011; 17:44–51.
针对智障人士的卫生政策和社区安全网
这篇文章探讨了智力和发育障碍领域的社会政策发展。它首先总结了1945年智障人士及其照顾者所面临的挑战。家庭依赖于拥挤不堪、资金不足的大型国家机构。智力残疾儿童被排斥在教育和公共服务之外。羞耻和耻辱,加上缺乏基于社区的服务,导致许多父母将孩子送进机构。联邦政府几乎没有为残疾人及其家庭提供任何具体援助。战后的美国通过全国弱智儿童协会(NARC)的出现,为父母们集体行动提供了肥沃的土壤。部分由于这种组织,20世纪50年代标志着一个令人惊讶的转折点,在此期间,联邦政府通过诸如社会保障的“残疾成年子女”计划等措施扩大了对残疾人的收入支持,并在20世纪70年代初出现了补充安全收入(SSI)。它还回顾了在个人医疗服务、病例管理、教育和其他社会服务之间的边界上,医疗补助作为医疗和社会服务的主要支付者的增长。文章最后总结了当前智障政策面临的挑战。报告指出,I/DD服务的规模、复杂性和费用构成了固有的挑战,特别是对当前经济衰退中的州和地方政府。根据通货膨胀调整后,2008年至2009年间,23个州实际上减少了I/DD服务的实际支出。考虑到当地情况,政治上保守的州实施了更大幅度的削减,并将州收入的一小部分用于智障服务。©2012 Wiley期刊公司Dev disability Res Rev 2011;17:44-51。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。