Correlation of recognition visual acuity with posterior retinal structure in advanced retinopathy of prematurity.

David K Wallace, Don L Bremer, William V Good, Rae Fellows, C Gail Summers, Betty Tung, Robert J Hardy
{"title":"Correlation of recognition visual acuity with posterior retinal structure in advanced retinopathy of prematurity.","authors":"David K Wallace,&nbsp;Don L Bremer,&nbsp;William V Good,&nbsp;Rae Fellows,&nbsp;C Gail Summers,&nbsp;Betty Tung,&nbsp;Robert J Hardy","doi":"10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE To compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity outcome with retinal structural outcome at the 6-year follow-up examination of infants randomized in the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity study. METHODS We compared the results in 606 eyes of subjects in whom both functional (visual acuity) and retinal structural assessments were obtained at age 6 years. Visual acuity assessments were performed by masked testers, and retinal examinations were performed by certified ophthalmologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Visual acuity and retinal structure at age 6 years. RESULTS Concordant outcomes occurred in 462 eyes (76.2%): 402 eyes had favorable functional and structural outcomes and 60 eyes had unfavorable functional and structural outcomes. Discordant outcomes occurred in 92 eyes (15.2%): 86 eyes had unfavorable functional and favorable structural outcomes and 6 eyes had favorable functional and unfavorable structural outcomes. Of the 86 eyes with unfavorable functional and favorable structural outcomes, 43 had optic atrophy (23 eyes) and/or retinal abnormalities that were less severe than those considered to be unfavorable (32 eyes). In 52 eyes (8.6%), retinal structure could not be assessed or the visual acuity was untestable. CONCLUSION Posterior pole appearance correlates well with visual acuity in 6-year-old infants with a history of advanced retinopathy of prematurity. APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE When the retinal structure is normal but visual acuity is poor in infants with a history of severe retinopathy of prematurity, other diagnoses such as optic atrophy and cortical visual impairment could at least partially account for the discrepancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00027222.</p>","PeriodicalId":8303,"journal":{"name":"Archives of ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2118","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity outcome with retinal structural outcome at the 6-year follow-up examination of infants randomized in the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity study. METHODS We compared the results in 606 eyes of subjects in whom both functional (visual acuity) and retinal structural assessments were obtained at age 6 years. Visual acuity assessments were performed by masked testers, and retinal examinations were performed by certified ophthalmologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Visual acuity and retinal structure at age 6 years. RESULTS Concordant outcomes occurred in 462 eyes (76.2%): 402 eyes had favorable functional and structural outcomes and 60 eyes had unfavorable functional and structural outcomes. Discordant outcomes occurred in 92 eyes (15.2%): 86 eyes had unfavorable functional and favorable structural outcomes and 6 eyes had favorable functional and unfavorable structural outcomes. Of the 86 eyes with unfavorable functional and favorable structural outcomes, 43 had optic atrophy (23 eyes) and/or retinal abnormalities that were less severe than those considered to be unfavorable (32 eyes). In 52 eyes (8.6%), retinal structure could not be assessed or the visual acuity was untestable. CONCLUSION Posterior pole appearance correlates well with visual acuity in 6-year-old infants with a history of advanced retinopathy of prematurity. APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE When the retinal structure is normal but visual acuity is poor in infants with a history of severe retinopathy of prematurity, other diagnoses such as optic atrophy and cortical visual impairment could at least partially account for the discrepancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00027222.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期早产儿视网膜病变后视网膜结构与识别视力的关系。
目的比较早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究中随机分组的早产儿视网膜病变早期治疗6年随访检查的视力结果和视网膜结构结果。方法我们比较了606只受试者6岁时的功能(视力)和视网膜结构评估结果。视力评估由蒙面测试者进行,视网膜检查由注册眼科医生进行。主要观察指标为6岁时的视力和视网膜结构。结果462只眼(76.2%)预后一致,402只眼功能和结构预后良好,60只眼功能和结构预后不良。92只眼(15.2%)出现不一致结果:86只眼功能不良和结构良好,6只眼功能良好和结构不良。在86只具有不良功能和良好结构结果的眼睛中,43只眼睛有视神经萎缩(23只眼睛)和/或视网膜异常,其严重程度低于被认为是不良的(32只眼睛)。52只眼(8.6%)视网膜结构无法评估或视力无法检测。结论有晚期早产儿视网膜病变史的6岁婴儿后极外观与视力密切相关。当有严重早产儿视网膜病变史的婴儿视网膜结构正常但视力较差时,其他诊断如视神经萎缩和皮质性视力障碍至少可以部分解释这种差异。试验注册clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00027222。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of ophthalmology
Archives of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correlation of recognition visual acuity with posterior retinal structure in advanced retinopathy of prematurity. Optical coherence tomographic imaging of sub-retinal pigment epithelium lipid. Continuous 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure patterns with a contact lens sensor: safety, tolerability, and reproducibility in patients with glaucoma. A simple metric can be a powerful tool for planning and advocacy. Declining use of sutures for wound closure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1