HSA programs for groups: employer versus employee responsibilities.

Benefits quarterly Pub Date : 2012-01-01
Whitney R Johnson
{"title":"HSA programs for groups: employer versus employee responsibilities.","authors":"Whitney R Johnson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Employers implementing a health savings account (HSA) program face a shared compliance burden with their employees. The law dictates that all HSAs are individual accounts that must be opened by an Internal Revenue Service (IRS)-approved custodian or trustee. The individual account features combined with a required third-party custodian place much of the compliance burden for HSAs on the employee and custodian rather than the employer. Employees are compensated for the additional burden because HSAs give them more control over their health care money, and employers are generally pleased with their own reduced compliance burden. The shared compliance responsibilities, however, create confusion and misunderstanding for both employers and employees. This article distinguishes between the responsibilities of the employer and the employees for HSAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":79563,"journal":{"name":"Benefits quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benefits quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Employers implementing a health savings account (HSA) program face a shared compliance burden with their employees. The law dictates that all HSAs are individual accounts that must be opened by an Internal Revenue Service (IRS)-approved custodian or trustee. The individual account features combined with a required third-party custodian place much of the compliance burden for HSAs on the employee and custodian rather than the employer. Employees are compensated for the additional burden because HSAs give them more control over their health care money, and employers are generally pleased with their own reduced compliance burden. The shared compliance responsibilities, however, create confusion and misunderstanding for both employers and employees. This article distinguishes between the responsibilities of the employer and the employees for HSAs.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团体HSA计划:雇主与雇员的责任。
实施健康储蓄账户(HSA)计划的雇主要与员工共同承担合规负担。法律规定,所有的HSAs都是个人账户,必须由美国国税局(IRS)批准的托管人或受托人开设。个人账户功能与所需的第三方托管人相结合,将HSAs的大部分合规负担转嫁给了雇员和托管人,而不是雇主。雇员的额外负担得到了补偿,因为HSAs让他们对自己的医疗费用有了更多的控制权,雇主通常对自己减轻的合规负担感到满意。然而,共同的合规责任给雇主和雇员都带来了混乱和误解。这篇文章区分了雇主和雇员对HSAs的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opioid Addiction and Implications for Employers. How Perceptions of Mental Illness Impact EAP Utilization. Pharmacogenetic Testing May Improve Drug Treatments and Shorten Disability Leaves. Return-to-Work Strategies for Employees With Mental Health Conditions. Bringing Workforce Health to the Top Line-Expanding the Value Proposition for Workforce Health Improvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1