Dermoscopy of squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma.

Cliff Rosendahl, Alan Cameron, Giuseppe Argenziano, Iris Zalaudek, Philipp Tschandl, Harald Kittler
{"title":"Dermoscopy of squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma.","authors":"Cliff Rosendahl,&nbsp;Alan Cameron,&nbsp;Giuseppe Argenziano,&nbsp;Iris Zalaudek,&nbsp;Philipp Tschandl,&nbsp;Harald Kittler","doi":"10.1001/archdermatol.2012.2974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVES To characterize dermoscopic criteria of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and keratoacanthoma and to compare them with other lesions. DESIGN Observer-masked study of consecutive lesions performed from March 1 through December 31, 2011. SETTING Primary care skin cancer practice in Brisbane, Australia. PARTICIPANTS A total of 186 patients with 206 lesions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and odds ratios. RESULTS In a retrospective analysis of 60 invasive SCC and 43 keratoacanthoma cases, keratin, surface scale, blood spots, white structureless zones, white circles, and coiled vessels were commonly found in both types of lesions. We reevaluated the significance of these criteria in 206 raised, nonpigmented lesions (32 SCCs, 29 keratoacanthomas, and 145 other lesions). Central keratin was more common in keratoacanthoma than in SCC (51.2% vs 30.0%, P = .03). Keratin had the highest sensitivity for keratoacanthoma and SCC (79%), and white circles had the highest specificity (87%). When keratoacanthoma and SCC were contrasted with basal cell carcinoma, the positive predictive values of keratin and white circles were 92% and 89%, respectively. When SCC and keratoacanthoma were contrasted with actinic keratosis and Bowen disease, the positive predictive value of keratin was 50% and that of white circles was 92%. In a multivariate model, white circles, keratin, and blood spots were independent predictors of SCC and keratoacanthoma. White circles had the highest odds ratio in favor of SCC and keratoacanthoma. The interobserver agreement for white circles was good (0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.65). CONCLUSIONS White circles, keratin, and blood spots are useful clues to differentiate SCC and keratoacanthoma from other raised nonpigmented skin lesions by dermoscopy. The significance of these criteria depends on the clinical context.</p>","PeriodicalId":8175,"journal":{"name":"Archives of dermatology","volume":"148 12","pages":"1386-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.2974","citationCount":"137","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.2974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 137

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To characterize dermoscopic criteria of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and keratoacanthoma and to compare them with other lesions. DESIGN Observer-masked study of consecutive lesions performed from March 1 through December 31, 2011. SETTING Primary care skin cancer practice in Brisbane, Australia. PARTICIPANTS A total of 186 patients with 206 lesions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and odds ratios. RESULTS In a retrospective analysis of 60 invasive SCC and 43 keratoacanthoma cases, keratin, surface scale, blood spots, white structureless zones, white circles, and coiled vessels were commonly found in both types of lesions. We reevaluated the significance of these criteria in 206 raised, nonpigmented lesions (32 SCCs, 29 keratoacanthomas, and 145 other lesions). Central keratin was more common in keratoacanthoma than in SCC (51.2% vs 30.0%, P = .03). Keratin had the highest sensitivity for keratoacanthoma and SCC (79%), and white circles had the highest specificity (87%). When keratoacanthoma and SCC were contrasted with basal cell carcinoma, the positive predictive values of keratin and white circles were 92% and 89%, respectively. When SCC and keratoacanthoma were contrasted with actinic keratosis and Bowen disease, the positive predictive value of keratin was 50% and that of white circles was 92%. In a multivariate model, white circles, keratin, and blood spots were independent predictors of SCC and keratoacanthoma. White circles had the highest odds ratio in favor of SCC and keratoacanthoma. The interobserver agreement for white circles was good (0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.65). CONCLUSIONS White circles, keratin, and blood spots are useful clues to differentiate SCC and keratoacanthoma from other raised nonpigmented skin lesions by dermoscopy. The significance of these criteria depends on the clinical context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鳞状细胞癌和角棘瘤的皮肤镜检查。
目的探讨鳞状细胞癌(SCC)和角棘瘤的皮肤镜诊断标准,并与其他病变进行比较。设计:对2011年3月1日至12月31日的连续病变进行观察者屏蔽研究。背景:澳大利亚布里斯班的初级保健皮肤癌诊所。参与者共186名患者,206个病变。主要结局指标敏感性、特异性、预测值和优势比。结果回顾性分析60例浸润性鳞状细胞癌和43例角棘瘤,两种病变均可见角蛋白、表面鳞片、血斑、白色无结构区、白色圆圈和卷曲血管。我们重新评估了这些标准在206个凸起的非色素病变中的意义(32个SCCs, 29个角棘层瘤和145个其他病变)。中心角蛋白在角棘瘤中比在鳞状细胞癌中更常见(51.2% vs 30.0%, P = 0.03)。角蛋白对角棘瘤和鳞状细胞癌的敏感性最高(79%),白色圆圈的特异性最高(87%)。当角棘瘤和鳞状细胞癌与基底细胞癌对比时,角蛋白和白色圆圈的阳性预测值分别为92%和89%。当SCC和角棘瘤与光化性角化病和Bowen病对比时,角蛋白阳性预测值为50%,白圈阳性预测值为92%。在一个多变量模型中,白色圆圈、角蛋白和血斑是SCC和角棘瘤的独立预测因子。白色圆圈有利于SCC和角棘瘤的比值比最高。观察者间对白圈的一致性很好(0.55;95% ci, 0.44-0.65)。结论皮肤镜下,白色圆圈、角蛋白和血斑是鉴别鳞状细胞癌和角棘瘤与其他凸起的非色素皮肤病变的有用线索。这些标准的意义取决于临床情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of dermatology
Archives of dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cutaneous leishmaniasis. Retrospective Analysis of Pediatric Alopecia Areata Treated with Methotrexate Pinwheel Flap as an Option to Reconstruct a Nasal Defect: A Series of Two Cases Amlodipine-Induced Hyperpigmentation Dermatological Manifestations in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia in Veracruz, Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1