Use of high-fidelity simulation for staff education/development: a systematic review of the literature.

Virginia J Hallenbeck
{"title":"Use of high-fidelity simulation for staff education/development: a systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Virginia J Hallenbeck","doi":"10.1097/NND.0b013e31827259c7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, high-fidelity simulations (HFS) are widely used in nursing education and are being introduced into acute care to assist with orientation programs, continuing education, certification courses, and staff development. In a review of the literature, many articles were found that describe HFS and its advantages and how to use the technology. But, there are few research studies to support the use. Upon completion of a review of the literature and an analysis of utility, the data do not clearly show that HFS is the best practice for the orientation and education of staff nurses. Overall, HFS is recognized as a safe way to learn, and most nurses like participating in HFSs. However, before the healthcare industry continues on this journey of widespread adoption of HFSs, more research needs to be done to show that the increased skills and knowledge of the nurse obtained through simulation does translate into safer patient care and better patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":79659,"journal":{"name":"Journal for nurses in staff development : JNSD : official journal of the National Nursing Staff Development Organization","volume":"28 6","pages":"260-9; quiz E9-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/NND.0b013e31827259c7","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for nurses in staff development : JNSD : official journal of the National Nursing Staff Development Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0b013e31827259c7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

Currently, high-fidelity simulations (HFS) are widely used in nursing education and are being introduced into acute care to assist with orientation programs, continuing education, certification courses, and staff development. In a review of the literature, many articles were found that describe HFS and its advantages and how to use the technology. But, there are few research studies to support the use. Upon completion of a review of the literature and an analysis of utility, the data do not clearly show that HFS is the best practice for the orientation and education of staff nurses. Overall, HFS is recognized as a safe way to learn, and most nurses like participating in HFSs. However, before the healthcare industry continues on this journey of widespread adoption of HFSs, more research needs to be done to show that the increased skills and knowledge of the nurse obtained through simulation does translate into safer patient care and better patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在员工教育/发展中使用高保真模拟:对文献的系统回顾。
目前,高保真模拟(high-fidelity simulation, HFS)广泛应用于护理教育中,并被引入到急症护理中,以辅助入职培训、继续教育、认证课程和员工发展。在文献回顾中,发现许多文章描述了HFS及其优势以及如何使用该技术。但是,很少有研究支持这种使用。在完成文献回顾和效用分析后,数据并不能清楚地表明HFS是护理人员定向和教育的最佳实践。总的来说,HFS被认为是一种安全的学习方式,大多数护士喜欢参加HFS。然而,在医疗保健行业继续广泛采用hfs之前,需要进行更多的研究,以证明通过模拟获得的护士技能和知识的提高确实可以转化为更安全的患者护理和更好的患者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"The development of an educational intervention to address workplace bullying." Letter to the editor. Use of high-fidelity simulation for staff education/development: a systematic review of the literature. Retention of new graduate nurses: the literature informs staff educators. Designing a process for simulation-based annual nurse competency assessment. Assessing nurses' continuing education preferences in rural community and urban academic settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1