Single chemical entity legal highs: assessing the risk for long term harm.

Carolyn B McNabb, Bruce R Russell, Daniele Caprioli, David J Nutt, Simon Gibbons, Jeffrey W Dalley
{"title":"Single chemical entity legal highs: assessing the risk for long term harm.","authors":"Carolyn B McNabb, Bruce R Russell, Daniele Caprioli, David J Nutt, Simon Gibbons, Jeffrey W Dalley","doi":"10.2174/1874473711205040005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A recent and dramatic increase in the emergence of novel psychoactive substances ('legal highs') has left many governments unable to provide a timely response to an increasing number of potentially harmful drugs now available to the public. In response to this rapid increase in lawful drug use, the UK government intends to implement temporary class drug orders, whereby substances with a potential for misuse and harm can be regulated for a 12 month period. During this period an investigation of the potential for harms induced by these drugs will take place. However, the short time-frame in which information must be gathered, and the paucity of data available on novel psychoactive substances, means that robust pharmacological and toxicological analyses may be replaced by extrapolating data from illegal drugs with similar chemical structures. This review explores the potential pharmacology and toxicology of past and present 'legal highs' and discusses the risks of failing to carry out in-depth scientific research on individual substances.</p>","PeriodicalId":72730,"journal":{"name":"Current drug abuse reviews","volume":"5 4","pages":"304-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug abuse reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874473711205040005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A recent and dramatic increase in the emergence of novel psychoactive substances ('legal highs') has left many governments unable to provide a timely response to an increasing number of potentially harmful drugs now available to the public. In response to this rapid increase in lawful drug use, the UK government intends to implement temporary class drug orders, whereby substances with a potential for misuse and harm can be regulated for a 12 month period. During this period an investigation of the potential for harms induced by these drugs will take place. However, the short time-frame in which information must be gathered, and the paucity of data available on novel psychoactive substances, means that robust pharmacological and toxicological analyses may be replaced by extrapolating data from illegal drugs with similar chemical structures. This review explores the potential pharmacology and toxicology of past and present 'legal highs' and discusses the risks of failing to carry out in-depth scientific research on individual substances.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单一化学实体合法兴奋剂:评估长期危害风险。
最近,新型精神活性物质("合法兴奋剂")的出现急剧增加,导致许多国家的政府无法及时应对公众目前可获得的日益增多的潜在有害药物。为了应对合法药物使用的快速增长,英国政府打算实施临时类药物令,对可能造成滥用和伤害的药物进行为期 12 个月的监管。在此期间,将对这些药物可能造成的危害进行调查。然而,由于收集信息的时限较短,且新型精神活性物质的可用数据较少,因此可能会通过推断化学结构相似的非法药物数据来取代可靠的药理学和毒理学分析。本综述探讨了过去和现在的 "合法兴奋剂 "的潜在药理学和毒理学,并讨论了不对个别物质进行深入科学研究的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface. Meet Our Editor-in-Chief Proceeding of the 8th Alcohol Hangover Research Group Meeting. Development of a Definition for the Alcohol Hangover: Consumer Descriptions and Expert Consensus. A Review of the Physiological Factors Associated with Alcohol Hangover.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1