A survey of nurses' perceptions of the intensive care delirium screening checklist.

Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont.) Pub Date : 2012-01-01
Tyler J Law, Nicole A Leistikow, Laura Hoofring, Sharon K Krumm, Karin J Neufeld, Dale M Needham
{"title":"A survey of nurses' perceptions of the intensive care delirium screening checklist.","authors":"Tyler J Law,&nbsp;Nicole A Leistikow,&nbsp;Laura Hoofring,&nbsp;Sharon K Krumm,&nbsp;Karin J Neufeld,&nbsp;Dale M Needham","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Delirium in critically ill patients is common and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Routine delirium screening is recommended by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. The Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) is one validated and commonly-used tool, but little is known about nurses'perceptions of using the ICDSC, and of barriers to delirium assessment and treatment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey was administered to 189 critical care-trained nurses working on four oncology inpatient units, where the ICDSC has been used for greater than five years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four nurses (44%) responded to the survey. Respondents indicated that they had knowledge of delirium, confidence in the ICDSC, and that the ICDSC was useful. Respondents perceived that physicians did not value the ICDSC results. Similar to prior nurse surveys for other delirium screening tools, physicians were the most frequently identified barrier to both delirium assessment and treatment, with other frequent barriers being lack of time, feedback on performance, and knowledge of delirium.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ICDSC is viewed favourably by nurses with experience using the tool. Future delirium screening programs should encourage physician engagement early in the planning process to help address perceived barriers to delirium assessment and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":80276,"journal":{"name":"Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Delirium in critically ill patients is common and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Routine delirium screening is recommended by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. The Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) is one validated and commonly-used tool, but little is known about nurses'perceptions of using the ICDSC, and of barriers to delirium assessment and treatment.

Design: A survey was administered to 189 critical care-trained nurses working on four oncology inpatient units, where the ICDSC has been used for greater than five years.

Results: Eighty-four nurses (44%) responded to the survey. Respondents indicated that they had knowledge of delirium, confidence in the ICDSC, and that the ICDSC was useful. Respondents perceived that physicians did not value the ICDSC results. Similar to prior nurse surveys for other delirium screening tools, physicians were the most frequently identified barrier to both delirium assessment and treatment, with other frequent barriers being lack of time, feedback on performance, and knowledge of delirium.

Conclusions: The ICDSC is viewed favourably by nurses with experience using the tool. Future delirium screening programs should encourage physician engagement early in the planning process to help address perceived barriers to delirium assessment and treatment.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士对重症监护谵妄筛查表的认知调查。
目的:谵妄在危重症患者中是常见的,并且与发病率和死亡率增加有关。重症监护医学学会推荐例行谵妄筛查。重症监护谵妄筛查清单(ICDSC)是一种经过验证和常用的工具,但很少了解护士使用ICDSC的看法,以及谵妄评估和治疗的障碍。设计:对四个肿瘤住院单位189名接受过重症护理培训的护士进行了调查,其中ICDSC已经使用了五年以上。结果:84名护士(44%)回复调查。受访者表示,他们了解谵妄,对ICDSC有信心,并且ICDSC是有用的。受访者认为,医生不重视ICDSC的结果。与之前对其他谵妄筛查工具的护士调查类似,医生是谵妄评估和治疗的最常见障碍,其他常见障碍是缺乏时间、对表现的反馈和谵妄的知识。结论:具有使用该工具经验的护士对ICDSC持赞成态度。未来的谵妄筛查项目应鼓励医生尽早参与计划过程,以帮助解决谵妄评估和治疗的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Transition from Stability to Chaos through Random Matrices Robust Global Trends during Pandemics: Analysing the Interplay of Biological and Social Processes Unveiling Dynamical Symmetries in 2D Chaotic Iterative Maps with Ordinal-Patterns-Based Complexity Quantifiers Thermal Hydraulics Simulation of a Water Spray System for a Cooling Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) Regenerator Investigation of Jamming Phenomenon in a Direct Reduction Furnace Pellet Feed System Using the Discrete Element Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1