Fetal and Infant Spontaneous General Movements as Predictors of Developmental Disabilities

Luba Zuk
{"title":"Fetal and Infant Spontaneous General Movements as Predictors of Developmental Disabilities","authors":"Luba Zuk","doi":"10.1002/ddrr.1104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The challenge of identifying infants who are at risk for developmental delay and possible adverse neurodevelopmental outcome demands methods of evaluation that will lead to early intervention to minimize developmental disability and to maximize the infant's potential. A qualitative assessment of spontaneous general movements (GMs) in the preterm, term, and young infant at risk is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation (Prechtl [1990] Early Hum. Dev. 23:151–158). The aim of this review is to describe the theoretical and clinical bases for the assessment of GMs and its relationship to developmental delay and brain dysfunction. Thirty-seven studies related to the predictive validity of GMs were included in this review. Results suggested that consistent cramped synchronized GMs are highly predictive of later development of cerebral palsy. The fidgety movement quality that appears at the age of 2 to 3 months was found to be a most sensitive predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome in different populations of infants. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2011;17:93–101.</p>","PeriodicalId":55176,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","volume":"17 2","pages":"93-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ddrr.1104","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ddrr.1104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The challenge of identifying infants who are at risk for developmental delay and possible adverse neurodevelopmental outcome demands methods of evaluation that will lead to early intervention to minimize developmental disability and to maximize the infant's potential. A qualitative assessment of spontaneous general movements (GMs) in the preterm, term, and young infant at risk is a valid and reliable tool for evaluation (Prechtl [1990] Early Hum. Dev. 23:151–158). The aim of this review is to describe the theoretical and clinical bases for the assessment of GMs and its relationship to developmental delay and brain dysfunction. Thirty-seven studies related to the predictive validity of GMs were included in this review. Results suggested that consistent cramped synchronized GMs are highly predictive of later development of cerebral palsy. The fidgety movement quality that appears at the age of 2 to 3 months was found to be a most sensitive predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome in different populations of infants. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2011;17:93–101.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胎儿和婴儿自发一般运动作为发育障碍的预测因子
识别有发育迟缓风险的婴儿和可能的不良神经发育结果的挑战需要评估方法,这些方法将导致早期干预,以最大限度地减少发育障碍并最大限度地发挥婴儿的潜力。对早产儿、足期婴儿和处于危险中的幼儿的自发性全身运动(GMs)进行定性评估是一种有效和可靠的评估工具(Prechtl [1990] Early Hum)。Dev。23:151 - 158)。本文的目的是描述GMs评估的理论和临床基础及其与发育迟缓和脑功能障碍的关系。本综述纳入了37项与GMs预测效度相关的研究。结果表明,一致的局促同步GMs高度预测脑瘫的后期发展。在不同的婴儿群体中,2至3个月时出现的烦躁运动质量被发现是神经发育结果的最敏感预测指标。©2013 Wiley期刊公司Dev - disability Rev 2011; 17:93-101。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aging and intellectual disability: Insights from mouse models of down syndrome Aging in rare intellectual disability syndromes Health, functioning, and participation of adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy: A review of outcomes research Fragile X syndrome: An aging perspective Editorial: Special issue on adult development and aging with IDD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1