The occurrence of bromide in herbal drugs: is there a need for a Ph. Eur. limit?

Q4 Medicine Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes Pub Date : 2013-01-01
H Albert, J Busch, B Klier, M Klötzel, M Kühn, B Steinhoff
{"title":"The occurrence of bromide in herbal drugs: is there a need for a Ph. Eur. limit?","authors":"H Albert,&nbsp;J Busch,&nbsp;B Klier,&nbsp;M Klötzel,&nbsp;M Kühn,&nbsp;B Steinhoff","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This contribution provides an overview on the current legal requirements regarding limits for bromide and presents data on the actual bromide burden of commonly used herbal drugs. Evaluation of an extensive data base shows that results exceeding the limit of 50 mg/kg are found in specific plants which take up bromide to a high extent from the environment. Thus, positive findings of bromide in herbal drugs do not necessarily serve as a proof for methyl bromide treatment. Taking into account the ADI recommended by EMA and WHO, there are no toxicological concerns with regard to the intake of herbal teas, extracts or comminuted herbal drugs at therapeutic doses. Furthermore, the use of methyl bromide and other fumigants must be documented within the batch documentation. If stated in the batch documentation that no fumigation was carried out, it is not necessary to perform the test on bromide. In cases of a particular suspect and if toxicological concerns exist, additional testing can be performed in accordance with the limits set by Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005. For the above reasons, information obtained by performing the test on bromide is not significant for the assessment of quality. Therefore, it seems no longer necessary to maintain bromide in Ph. Eur. general chapter 2.8.13. Pesticide residues and it is recommended to delete it from Table 2.8.13.-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2013 ","pages":"40-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This contribution provides an overview on the current legal requirements regarding limits for bromide and presents data on the actual bromide burden of commonly used herbal drugs. Evaluation of an extensive data base shows that results exceeding the limit of 50 mg/kg are found in specific plants which take up bromide to a high extent from the environment. Thus, positive findings of bromide in herbal drugs do not necessarily serve as a proof for methyl bromide treatment. Taking into account the ADI recommended by EMA and WHO, there are no toxicological concerns with regard to the intake of herbal teas, extracts or comminuted herbal drugs at therapeutic doses. Furthermore, the use of methyl bromide and other fumigants must be documented within the batch documentation. If stated in the batch documentation that no fumigation was carried out, it is not necessary to perform the test on bromide. In cases of a particular suspect and if toxicological concerns exist, additional testing can be performed in accordance with the limits set by Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005. For the above reasons, information obtained by performing the test on bromide is not significant for the assessment of quality. Therefore, it seems no longer necessary to maintain bromide in Ph. Eur. general chapter 2.8.13. Pesticide residues and it is recommended to delete it from Table 2.8.13.-1.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
草药中溴化物的出现:是否需要博士学位?限制?
本报告概述了目前有关溴化物限量的法律要求,并提供了关于常用草药实际溴化物负担的数据。对一个广泛数据库的评价表明,在从环境中大量吸收溴化物的特定植物中发现了超过50毫克/公斤限值的结果。因此,草药中溴的阳性结果并不一定能作为甲基溴治疗的证据。考虑到EMA和世卫组织推荐的每日推荐摄入量,对于以治疗剂量摄入草药茶、提取物或粉碎的草药,不存在毒理学问题。此外,必须在批文件中记录甲基溴和其他熏蒸剂的使用情况。如果批文件中声明未进行熏蒸,则没有必要对溴化物进行测试。如果存在特定的可疑情况和毒理学问题,则可以根据法规(EC) No 396/2005规定的限制进行额外的测试。由于上述原因,对溴化物进行测试所获得的信息对于质量评估并不重要。因此,似乎不再需要在Ph. Eur中维持溴化物。通论2.8.13。农药残留,建议从表2.8.13 -1中删除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collaborative study for the establishment of Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation for Human tetanus immunoglobulin batch 2. Collaborative study for the establishment of Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation for Human tetanus immunoglobulin batch 2. Determination of procoagulant activity in human normal immunoglobulin preparations for therapeutic use by FXIa chromogenic assay: Evaluation of test kit sensitivity, reference standard performance and product formulation effects on the FXIa assay. Ph. Eur. testing for histamine and depressor substances using guinea-pigs and cats: the end of an era. Strategy for removal of animal tests for histamine and depressor substances and their vestiges from the Ph. Eur. International collaborative study to assess new stocks of candidate reference preparations to control the level of anti-D in IVIG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1