An international collaborative study was organised by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM, Council of Europe) to calibrate replacement batches for the current European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Prekallikrein Activator (PKA) in albumin Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) whose stocks were dwindling. The study was run in the framework of the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the Council of Europe and the European Union (EU) Commission. Twenty-four laboratories from official medicines control authorities and manufacturers in Europe and outside Europe took part in the study. Three candidate replacement batches were produced with albumin solutions artificially spiked with a PKA concentrate to increase their PKA level. Participants were requested to evaluate the candidate batches against the 3rd World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for Prekallikrein activator in albumin (16/364) using their routine assay method. The Ph. Eur. PKA in albumin BRP batch 7 (BRP7) was also included in the test panel to ensure the continuity of the consecutive BRP batches. The 3 candidate replacement batches were considered suitable for their intended use as BRPs. The study confirmed the stability of the PKA content of the current BRP7. Thermal stress study on the candidate batches confirmed the stability of their PKA activity. In December 2023, the Ph. Eur. Commission officially adopted the 3 candidate batches as Ph. Eur. PKA in albumin BRP batches 8, 9 and 10 with assigned potencies of 37 IU/vial, 33 IU/vial and 34 IU/vial, respectively. The activity of the 3 new batches of Ph. Eur. PKA in albumin BRP will be regularly monitored.
{"title":"Collaborative Study for the Calibration of the Ph.Eur. Prekallikrein Activator in Albumin Biological Reference Preparation batches 8, 9 and 10.","authors":"C Kefeder, S Eichmeir, D Le Tallec, S Jouette","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An international collaborative study was organised by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM, Council of Europe) to calibrate replacement batches for the current European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Prekallikrein Activator (PKA) in albumin Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) whose stocks were dwindling. The study was run in the framework of the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the Council of Europe and the European Union (EU) Commission. Twenty-four laboratories from official medicines control authorities and manufacturers in Europe and outside Europe took part in the study. Three candidate replacement batches were produced with albumin solutions artificially spiked with a PKA concentrate to increase their PKA level. Participants were requested to evaluate the candidate batches against the 3rd World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for Prekallikrein activator in albumin (16/364) using their routine assay method. The Ph. Eur. PKA in albumin BRP batch 7 (BRP7) was also included in the test panel to ensure the continuity of the consecutive BRP batches. The 3 candidate replacement batches were considered suitable for their intended use as BRPs. The study confirmed the stability of the PKA content of the current BRP7. Thermal stress study on the candidate batches confirmed the stability of their PKA activity. In December 2023, the Ph. Eur. Commission officially adopted the 3 candidate batches as Ph. Eur. PKA in albumin BRP batches 8, 9 and 10 with assigned potencies of 37 IU/vial, 33 IU/vial and 34 IU/vial, respectively. The activity of the 3 new batches of Ph. Eur. PKA in albumin BRP will be regularly monitored.</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"193-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Recombinant adeno-associated viruses (AAV) are widely used as gene therapy vectors in human gene therapy. Reliable and accurate quantification of the physical particle titre is one of the parameters to be determined for precise dosing, which is of critical importance for the patients. In this report, we describe the validation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the determination of the total AAV-2 physical particle titre through an international collaborative study organised by the Gene Therapy Working Group of the General European Official Medicines Control Laboratories Network co-ordinated by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), which aims to develop and validate standard analytical methods for the quality control of gene therapy products. The method is based on a classical sandwich ELISA which uses monoclonal antibodies specific for a conformational epitope only present on the assembled capsid. The AAV-2 Reference Standard Stock Material was used as reference preparation. This study allowed validation of the sensitivity, accuracy and reproducibility of the method and definition of its working range. In addition, specificity and discriminatory capacity towards degraded preparations was also demonstrated.
重组腺相关病毒(AAV)作为基因治疗载体广泛应用于人类基因治疗。可靠、准确地量化物理颗粒滴度是精确给药的参数之一,这对患者至关重要。在本报告中,我们介绍了酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)用于测定 AAV-2 物理微粒总滴度的验证情况,该方法是由欧洲官方药品控制实验室网络(General European Official Medicines Control Laboratories Network)基因治疗工作组(Gene Therapy Working Group)组织的一项国际合作研究,由欧洲药品与保健质量管理局(European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare, EDQM)负责协调,旨在开发和验证基因治疗产品质控的标准分析方法。该方法基于经典的夹心酶联免疫吸附法,使用的单克隆抗体对仅存在于组装好的囊壳上的构象表位具有特异性。AAV-2 标准物质被用作参考制剂。这项研究验证了该方法的灵敏度、准确性和可重复性,并确定了其工作范围。此外,还证明了对降解制剂的特异性和鉴别能力。
{"title":"Validation of an ELISA method for determination of physical particle titre of AAV2-based vector preparations.","authors":"A Costanzo, E Regourd, V Ridoux","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recombinant adeno-associated viruses (AAV) are widely used as gene therapy vectors in human gene therapy. Reliable and accurate quantification of the physical particle titre is one of the parameters to be determined for precise dosing, which is of critical importance for the patients. In this report, we describe the validation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the determination of the total AAV-2 physical particle titre through an international collaborative study organised by the Gene Therapy Working Group of the General European Official Medicines Control Laboratories Network co-ordinated by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), which aims to develop and validate standard analytical methods for the quality control of gene therapy products. The method is based on a classical sandwich ELISA which uses monoclonal antibodies specific for a conformational epitope only present on the assembled capsid. The AAV-2 Reference Standard Stock Material was used as reference preparation. This study allowed validation of the sensitivity, accuracy and reproducibility of the method and definition of its working range. In addition, specificity and discriminatory capacity towards degraded preparations was also demonstrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"221-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142733133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
H Behrensdorf-Nicol, B Krämer, D Le Tallec, N Sinitskaya, M-E Behr-Gross
<p><p>For several decades the European Pharmacopoeia monographs <i>Tetanus vaccine (adsorbed) (0452)</i> and <i>Tetanus vaccine for veterinary use (0697)</i> required that Specific toxicity and Absence of toxin and irreversibility of the toxoidof each bulk of tetanus toxoids had to be tested by an <i>in vivo</i> toxicity test in guinea pigs before it could be included in vaccines for human or veterinary use. In line with the 3Rs concept of replacing, reducing and refining animal experiments, an <i>in vitro</i> method for the detection of active tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) has been developed at the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI, Germany). This method, the so-called BINACLE (binding and cleavage) assay, uses the receptor-binding and proteolytic properties of TeNT for the specific detection of active toxin molecules. Successful in-house validation studies as well as a small-scale transferability study had demonstrated that this method may represent a suitable alternative to the compendial <i>in vivo</i> toxicity test. As a follow up, an international collaborative study aimed at verifying the suitability of the BINACLE assay as a potential alternative to the guinea pig toxicity test for tetanus toxoids was organised by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) under the aegis of its Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP). Within the framework of this study, coded BSP136, a feasibility phase - also referred to as Phase 1 - was run to select and qualify critical study reagents and samples and to assess the performance of the BINACLE Standard Operating Procedure developed by the project leaders. Then the international collaborative study aimed at evaluating the BINACLE, referred to as BSP136 Phase 2, was started. A total of 19 international laboratories (comprising vaccine manufacturers as well as national control laboratories) were supplied with a detailed assay protocol, critical reagents required for the assay, three samples consisting of three different bulk tetanus toxoids donated by major European vaccine manufacturers and one international standard toxoid. Each of the participants was asked to perform three independent BINACLE assays following the provided protocol. The statistical analysis of the results showed that most of the participating laboratories were able to perform the BINACLE assay according to the provided protocol. However, the results obtained by the participants varied widely, and not all the laboratories were able to achieve a sensitive detection of active TeNT. Multiple factors may have contributed to the elevated variability of the BSP136 study results. From an analysis of these factors, strategies were developed to help increase the standardisation of the BINACLE assay and obtain more consistent results in a follow-up validation study, BSP 136 Phase 3 (Part 2), for which the experimental phase took place in 2023. The present manuscript summarises the outcome of Phases 1 and 2, which constitute P
{"title":"Collaborative study for the characterisation of the BINACLE Assay for <i>in vitro</i> detection of tetanus toxicity in toxoids - Part 1.","authors":"H Behrensdorf-Nicol, B Krämer, D Le Tallec, N Sinitskaya, M-E Behr-Gross","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For several decades the European Pharmacopoeia monographs <i>Tetanus vaccine (adsorbed) (0452)</i> and <i>Tetanus vaccine for veterinary use (0697)</i> required that Specific toxicity and Absence of toxin and irreversibility of the toxoidof each bulk of tetanus toxoids had to be tested by an <i>in vivo</i> toxicity test in guinea pigs before it could be included in vaccines for human or veterinary use. In line with the 3Rs concept of replacing, reducing and refining animal experiments, an <i>in vitro</i> method for the detection of active tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) has been developed at the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI, Germany). This method, the so-called BINACLE (binding and cleavage) assay, uses the receptor-binding and proteolytic properties of TeNT for the specific detection of active toxin molecules. Successful in-house validation studies as well as a small-scale transferability study had demonstrated that this method may represent a suitable alternative to the compendial <i>in vivo</i> toxicity test. As a follow up, an international collaborative study aimed at verifying the suitability of the BINACLE assay as a potential alternative to the guinea pig toxicity test for tetanus toxoids was organised by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) under the aegis of its Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP). Within the framework of this study, coded BSP136, a feasibility phase - also referred to as Phase 1 - was run to select and qualify critical study reagents and samples and to assess the performance of the BINACLE Standard Operating Procedure developed by the project leaders. Then the international collaborative study aimed at evaluating the BINACLE, referred to as BSP136 Phase 2, was started. A total of 19 international laboratories (comprising vaccine manufacturers as well as national control laboratories) were supplied with a detailed assay protocol, critical reagents required for the assay, three samples consisting of three different bulk tetanus toxoids donated by major European vaccine manufacturers and one international standard toxoid. Each of the participants was asked to perform three independent BINACLE assays following the provided protocol. The statistical analysis of the results showed that most of the participating laboratories were able to perform the BINACLE assay according to the provided protocol. However, the results obtained by the participants varied widely, and not all the laboratories were able to achieve a sensitive detection of active TeNT. Multiple factors may have contributed to the elevated variability of the BSP136 study results. From an analysis of these factors, strategies were developed to help increase the standardisation of the BINACLE assay and obtain more consistent results in a follow-up validation study, BSP 136 Phase 3 (Part 2), for which the experimental phase took place in 2023. The present manuscript summarises the outcome of Phases 1 and 2, which constitute P","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"127-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142113041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
H Behrensdorf-Nicol, D Le Tallec, N Sinitskaya, M-E Behr-Gross, C Göngrich
Tetanus vaccines for human and veterinary use are produced by formaldehyde-induced inactivation of tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) purified from Clostridium tetani cultures. Due to the high morbidity caused by exposure to TeNT it is essential that the quality control of tetanus vaccines includes testing for absence of tetanus toxin as prescribed by European Pharmacopoeia monographs 0452 and 0697. Currently this test is carried out in guinea pigs for each bulk of tetanus toxoid. To test the applicability of the in vitro BINACLE ("binding and cleavage") assay as an alternative method for the quality control of tetanus vaccines, two collaborative studies were run by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme. The first collaborative study indicated that the method allows sensitive TeNT detection. However, a clear conclusion could not be drawn due to the high variability of the results. To address the variability, the protocol was optimised and further standardised for the second study. The study results demonstrated good assay precision, both with respect to repeatability and reproducibility. Importantly, the limit of detection was 0.11 ng/mL TeNT in five out of nine laboratories and 0.33 ng/mL in four out of nine laboratories, suggesting that the BINACLE assay can detect TeNT with similar sensitivity as in vivo toxicity tests and can thus be taken into consideration as an alternative method to the current compendial in vivo test.
{"title":"Collaborative study for the characterisation of the BINACLE Assay for <i>in vitro</i> detection of tetanus toxicity in toxoids - Part 2.","authors":"H Behrensdorf-Nicol, D Le Tallec, N Sinitskaya, M-E Behr-Gross, C Göngrich","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tetanus vaccines for human and veterinary use are produced by formaldehyde-induced inactivation of tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) purified from <i>Clostridium tetani</i> cultures. Due to the high morbidity caused by exposure to TeNT it is essential that the quality control of tetanus vaccines includes testing for absence of tetanus toxin as prescribed by European Pharmacopoeia monographs <i>0452</i> and <i>0697</i>. Currently this test is carried out in guinea pigs for each bulk of tetanus toxoid. To test the applicability of the <i>in vitro</i> BINACLE (\"binding and cleavage\") assay as an alternative method for the quality control of tetanus vaccines, two collaborative studies were run by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme. The first collaborative study indicated that the method allows sensitive TeNT detection. However, a clear conclusion could not be drawn due to the high variability of the results. To address the variability, the protocol was optimised and further standardised for the second study. The study results demonstrated good assay precision, both with respect to repeatability and reproducibility. Importantly, the limit of detection was 0.11 ng/mL TeNT in five out of nine laboratories and 0.33 ng/mL in four out of nine laboratories, suggesting that the BINACLE assay can detect TeNT with similar sensitivity as <i>in vivo</i> toxicity tests and can thus be taken into consideration as an alternative method to the current compendial <i>in vivo</i> test.</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"162-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142113042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M-E Behr-Gross, D Le Tallec, N Sinitskaya, C Milne, M Etscheid
In 2010, the reporting of thrombotic adverse events for one subcutaneous and certain intravenous immunoglobulins (IGs) raised some concerns. In Europe, regulatory bodies rapidly revised compendial specifications for therapeutic IGs to ensure they do not exhibit thrombogenic (procoagulant) activity (PCA). At the global level, a working group (GWG) was launched with the aim of assessing PCA measurement methods and limits, considering results obtained by human IG manufacturers during in-process controls. The GWG created three dedicated subgroups to investigate the FXIa chromogenic assay, the non-activated partial thromboplastin time (NAPTT) test and the thrombin generation assay (TGA). The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) was responsible for co-ordinating the subgroup in charge of evaluating the FXIa chromogenic assay in a study that assessed the sensitivity and robustness of two commercial chromogenic FXIa test kits. The impact of IG product formulation on FXIa recovery and the suitability of PCA-containing IG products as potential reference standards/controls were also assessed. IG materials representative of marketed products were provided to four laboratories for a study that was carried out in two steps: 1) two chromogenic FXIa test kit manufacturers assessed the performance and determined optimal test conditions by their respective methods, 2) two OMCLs studied both kits using an optimised study design. Regarding sensitivity, the study results identified suitable dose-response intervals and limits with both chromogenic FXIa test kits. This allowed the establishment of dilution ranges for optimal detection of FXIa/PCA in 5 % and 10 % IG products in the range of 1-6 mIU/mL. However, careful optimisation of the sample dilutions was required (notably to avoid potential matrix effects) and the choice of the mode of data acquisition (kinetic or end-point method) contributed to sensitivity in routine use. Importantly, the composition of IG products was of minor concern for FXIa determination with both test kits. Potential reference materials evaluated in the study behaved as expected and could be useful should a separate reference standard to the FXIa WHO IS be deemed necessary in future.
{"title":"Determination of procoagulant activity in human normal immunoglobulin preparations for therapeutic use by FXIa chromogenic assay: Evaluation of test kit sensitivity, reference standard performance and product formulation effects on the FXIa assay.","authors":"M-E Behr-Gross, D Le Tallec, N Sinitskaya, C Milne, M Etscheid","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2010, the reporting of thrombotic adverse events for one subcutaneous and certain intravenous immunoglobulins (IGs) raised some concerns. In Europe, regulatory bodies rapidly revised compendial specifications for therapeutic IGs to ensure they do not exhibit thrombogenic (procoagulant) activity (PCA). At the global level, a working group (GWG) was launched with the aim of assessing PCA measurement methods and limits, considering results obtained by human IG manufacturers during in-process controls. The GWG created three dedicated subgroups to investigate the FXIa chromogenic assay, the non-activated partial thromboplastin time (NAPTT) test and the thrombin generation assay (TGA). The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) was responsible for co-ordinating the subgroup in charge of evaluating the FXIa chromogenic assay in a study that assessed the sensitivity and robustness of two commercial chromogenic FXIa test kits. The impact of IG product formulation on FXIa recovery and the suitability of PCA-containing IG products as potential reference standards/controls were also assessed. IG materials representative of marketed products were provided to four laboratories for a study that was carried out in two steps: 1) two chromogenic FXIa test kit manufacturers assessed the performance and determined optimal test conditions by their respective methods, 2) two OMCLs studied both kits using an optimised study design. Regarding sensitivity, the study results identified suitable dose-response intervals and limits with both chromogenic FXIa test kits. This allowed the establishment of dilution ranges for optimal detection of FXIa/PCA in 5 % and 10 % IG products in the range of 1-6 mIU/mL. However, careful optimisation of the sample dilutions was required (notably to avoid potential matrix effects) and the choice of the mode of data acquisition (kinetic or end-point method) contributed to sensitivity in routine use. Importantly, the composition of IG products was of minor concern for FXIa determination with both test kits. Potential reference materials evaluated in the study behaved as expected and could be useful should a separate reference standard to the FXIa WHO IS be deemed necessary in future.</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"27-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140294865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The level of anti-D antibodies in human immunoglobulin products for intravenous administration (IVIG) is controlled by the direct haemagglutination method prescribed by the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) that requires 2 control reference reagents. The World Health Organization (WHO) positive control International Reference Reagent (IRR; 02/228) with a nominal titre of 8 defines the highest acceptable titre, while the negative control preparation (02/226) has a nominal titre of <2. Working reference preparations (04/132 and 04/140) were subsequently established as Biological Reference Preparations (BRPs) for the Ph. Eur., and for distribution by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC). Due to diminishing stocks of these working reference preparations across the 3 institutions, a joint international study was organised to establish harmonised replacement batches. Sixteen laboratories contributed data to the study to evaluate positive and negative candidate replacement batches (13/148 and 12/300, respectively) against the WHO positive and negative control IRRs and the current working reference preparations (BRPs). The results show that the candidate reference preparations (13/148 and 12/300) are indistinguishable from the corresponding IRRs and current BRPs. The candidate preparations 13/148 and 12/300 were adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission as Immunoglobulin (anti-D antibodies test) BRP batch 2 and Immunoglobulin (anti-D antibodies test negative control) BRP batch 2 with nominal haemagglutination titres of 8 and <2, respectively. The same materials were also adopted as NIBSC and US FDA reference preparations, thus ensuring full harmonisation.
静脉注射用人免疫球蛋白产品(IVIG)中的抗 D 抗体水平由《欧洲药典》(Ph. Eur.)规定的直接血凝法控制,该方法需要两种对照参考试剂。世界卫生组织(WHO)的阳性对照国际参考试剂(IRR;02/228)的标称滴度为 8,确定了可接受的最高滴度,而阴性对照制剂(02/226)的标称滴度为
{"title":"International collaborative study to assess new stocks of candidate reference preparations to control the level of anti-D in IVIG","authors":"S J Thorpe, M L Virata, B Fox, E Terao","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The level of anti-D antibodies in human immunoglobulin products for intravenous administration (IVIG) is controlled by the direct haemagglutination method prescribed by the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) that requires 2 control reference reagents. The World Health Organization (WHO) positive control International Reference Reagent (IRR; 02/228) with a nominal titre of 8 defines the highest acceptable titre, while the negative control preparation (02/226) has a nominal titre of <2. Working reference preparations (04/132 and 04/140) were subsequently established as Biological Reference Preparations (BRPs) for the Ph. Eur., and for distribution by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC). Due to diminishing stocks of these working reference preparations across the 3 institutions, a joint international study was organised to establish harmonised replacement batches. Sixteen laboratories contributed data to the study to evaluate positive and negative candidate replacement batches (13/148 and 12/300, respectively) against the WHO positive and negative control IRRs and the current working reference preparations (BRPs). The results show that the candidate reference preparations (13/148 and 12/300) are indistinguishable from the corresponding IRRs and current BRPs. The candidate preparations 13/148 and 12/300 were adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission as Immunoglobulin (anti-D antibodies test) BRP batch 2 and Immunoglobulin (anti-D antibodies test negative control) BRP batch 2 with nominal haemagglutination titres of 8 and <2, respectively. The same materials were also adopted as NIBSC and US FDA reference preparations, thus ensuring full harmonisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"76-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141471327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
For more than 50 years, in vivo assays have been used for testing pharmaceutical product safety due to their assumed ability to broadly detect potential unidentified contaminants. As part of these in vivo tests, the animal tests for depressor substances and histamine have been described in the European Pharmacopoeia since its first edition in 1977. Both tests measure the effect of histamine and histamine-like substances, using guinea-pigs and cats respectively. In 2024, the Histamine (2.6.10) general chapter is referenced in the Production section of four monographs and 10 monographs have variations of a sentence on designing the manufacturing process to eliminate or minimise substances lowering blood pressure in this same section, without referencing the chapter. The Depressor substances (2.6.11) chapter is referenced only in the Histamine (2.6.10) chapter as a next step if the histamine test is invalid. A historical search was performed and it has shown that the tests for histamine and for depressor substances were introduced by different groups of experts in an inconsistent way at different times, and for different reasons, leading to non-harmonised approaches across monographs. The control of histamine and other depressor substances has been the subject of numerous debates where their use was questioned. During these discussions, reports on positive cases or batches failing the test for histamine or depressor substances were anecdotal. In addition, in vivo tests can be considered non-specific, very variable, time-consuming, costly and ethically doubtful. More importantly, the majority of in vivo methods originate from a time when good manufacturing practice was not widely used and formal method validation requirements were not yet established. In view of the above, the removal of all references to animal tests for histamine or depressor substances from all texts still referring to them is proposed. Since the sentences in the Production section referring to the control of "substances lowering blood pressure", "vasoactive substances" or "hypotensive substances" appeared as remainders of the animal test without further guarantee of safety, it will also be proposed to remove all these sentences from the concerned monographs. Ultimately, the suppression of general chapters 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 from the Ph. Eur. is envisaged. Independently from the above, it is also envisaged to elaborate a new general chapter Histamine in active substances (2.5.47) to include physicochemical or immunochemical methods enabling the detection of histamine. This new text would aim at supporting manufacturers in their histamine control strategy following the inclusion of precaution statements in the general monograph on Products of fermentation (1468); these statements had been added in Ph. Eur. Supplements 9.6 and 10.4, following adverse events related to a GMP issue with gentamicin sulfate. This strategy has
{"title":"Ph. Eur. testing for histamine and depressor substances using guinea-pigs and cats: the end of an era. Strategy for removal of animal tests for histamine and depressor substances and their vestiges from the Ph. Eur.","authors":"M Bratos, O Kolaj-Robin, M Antoni, E Charton","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For more than 50 years, <i>in vivo</i> assays have been used for testing pharmaceutical product safety due to their assumed ability to broadly detect potential unidentified contaminants. As part of these in vivo tests, the animal tests for depressor substances and histamine have been described in the European Pharmacopoeia since its first edition in 1977. Both tests measure the effect of histamine and histamine-like substances, using guinea-pigs and cats respectively. In 2024, the <i>Histamine (2.6.10)</i> general chapter is referenced in the Production section of four monographs and 10 monographs have variations of a sentence on designing the manufacturing process to eliminate or minimise substances lowering blood pressure in this same section, without referencing the chapter. The <i>Depressor substances (2.6.11)</i> chapter is referenced only in the <i>Histamine (2.6.10)</i> chapter as a next step if the histamine test is invalid. A historical search was performed and it has shown that the tests for histamine and for depressor substances were introduced by different groups of experts in an inconsistent way at different times, and for different reasons, leading to non-harmonised approaches across monographs. The control of histamine and other depressor substances has been the subject of numerous debates where their use was questioned. During these discussions, reports on positive cases or batches failing the test for histamine or depressor substances were anecdotal. In addition, in vivo tests can be considered non-specific, very variable, time-consuming, costly and ethically doubtful. More importantly, the majority of in vivo methods originate from a time when good manufacturing practice was not widely used and formal method validation requirements were not yet established. In view of the above, the removal of all references to animal tests for histamine or depressor substances from all texts still referring to them is proposed. Since the sentences in the Production section referring to the control of \"substances lowering blood pressure\", \"vasoactive substances\" or \"hypotensive substances\" appeared as remainders of the animal test without further guarantee of safety, it will also be proposed to remove all these sentences from the concerned monographs. Ultimately, the suppression of general chapters <i>2.6.10</i> and <i>2.6.11</i> from the Ph. Eur. is envisaged. Independently from the above, it is also envisaged to elaborate a new general chapter <i>Histamine in active substances (2.5.47)</i> to include physicochemical or immunochemical methods enabling the detection of histamine. This new text would aim at supporting manufacturers in their histamine control strategy following the inclusion of precaution statements in the general monograph on <i>Products of fermentation (1468)</i>; these statements had been added in Ph. Eur. Supplements 9.6 and 10.4, following adverse events related to a GMP issue with gentamicin sulfate. This strategy has ","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"12-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140294866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Human immunoglobulin products are used for the treatment of a number of diseases, such as primary or secondary immunodeficiencies and autoimmune conditions due to the complete absence of antibodies or the production of defective immunoglobulins. Quality control of human immunoglobulin products is essential to ensure therapeutic functionality and safety. This includes testing for Fc function and anticomplementary activity (ACA), as well as verification of appropriate molecular size distribution using size-exclusion chromatography as prescribed in the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monographs 0338, 0918, 2788 and 1928. To this end, specific biological reference preparations (BRPs) must be used. Stocks of the Ph. Eur. Human immunoglobulin (molecular size) BRP were running low and therefore a collaborative study was run by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme, to calibrate replacement batches. Eighteen laboratories, including manufacturers and Official Medicines Control Laboratories, took part in the study. Three batches of candidate BRPs were assessed and compared to Ph. Eur. Human immunoglobulin (molecular size) BRP 3 to ensure continuity. Based on the study results, the candidate BRPs were adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission as Ph. Eur. Human immunoglobulin (molecular size) BRP batch 4, 5 and 6.
{"title":"Collaborative study for the establishment of Human immunoglobulin (molecular size) BRP replacement batches 4, 5 and 6.","authors":"S Jouette, E Regourd","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human immunoglobulin products are used for the treatment of a number of diseases, such as primary or secondary immunodeficiencies and autoimmune conditions due to the complete absence of antibodies or the production of defective immunoglobulins. Quality control of human immunoglobulin products is essential to ensure therapeutic functionality and safety. This includes testing for Fc function and anticomplementary activity (ACA), as well as verification of appropriate molecular size distribution using size-exclusion chromatography as prescribed in the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monographs 0338, 0918, 2788 and 1928. To this end, specific biological reference preparations (BRPs) must be used. Stocks of the Ph. Eur. Human immunoglobulin (molecular size) BRP were running low and therefore a collaborative study was run by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme, to calibrate replacement batches. Eighteen laboratories, including manufacturers and Official Medicines Control Laboratories, took part in the study. Three batches of candidate BRPs were assessed and compared to Ph. Eur. Human immunoglobulin (molecular size) BRP 3 to ensure continuity. Based on the study results, the candidate BRPs were adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission as Ph. Eur. Human immunoglobulin (molecular size) BRP batch 4, 5 and 6.</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"90-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141535598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
An international collaborative study was jointly organised by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) to establish the WHO 3rd International Standard (IS) for Prekallikrein activator (PKA) and European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) PKA in albumin Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) batch 7. Twenty-six laboratories took part in the study to calibrate these replacement batches, as well as an additional reserve batch for the WHO IS, against the current WHO 2nd IS for PKA (02/168). Ph. Eur. PKA in albumin BRP batch 6 was also included to evaluate the continuity of the consecutive batches of BRP. The centrally calculated overall Huber's means based on the results from laboratories with at least two valid assays were 29.6 and 29.6 IU/ampoule for the candidate WHO 3rd IS (Sample A) and reserve batch (Sample B), and were 38.4 and 37.0 IU/vial for the current BRP batch 6 (Sample C) and the candidate BRP batch 7 (Sample D). The intra-laboratory variation expressed as coefficient of variation (CV) ranged between 1.4 and 16.6 %. The inter-laboratory variation expressed as CV based on Huber's means ranged between 4.4 and 5.4 %. The Huber's mean activity of Sample D against Sample C was 36.6 IU/vial with a CV of 1.7 %. These results confirm the good continuity of the consecutive batches of BRP. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended to establish Sample A as the WHO 3rd IS for PKA with an assigned potency of 30 IU/ampoule and Sample D as the Ph. Eur. PKA in albumin BRP batch 7 with an assigned potency of 37 IU/vial. Sample B is intended to be kept as a future reserve replacement WHO IS.
世界卫生组织(WHO)和欧洲药品和保健品质量管理局(EDQM)联合组织了一项国际合作研究,以制定世卫组织第3版PKA国际标准(IS)和欧洲药典(Ph. Eur.)第7批白蛋白生物参考制剂(BRP)中的PKA标准。26 家实验室参加了这项研究,对照当前的世卫组织 PKA 第 2 IS (02/168),校准了这些替代批次以及世卫组织 IS 的额外储备批次。欧洲药典白蛋白 BRP 第 6 批中的 PKA 也包括在内,以评估连续批次 BRP 的连续性。根据至少有两次有效检测的实验室的结果,集中计算出的总胡伯均值分别为:候选 WHO 第 3 IS 批(样品 A)和储备批(样品 B)为 29.6 和 29.6 IU/安瓿瓶,当前 BRP 第 6 批(样品 C)和候选 BRP 第 7 批(样品 D)为 38.4 和 37.0 IU/瓶。以变异系数(CV)表示的实验室内变异介于 1.4%和 16.6%之间。实验室间的差异以基于胡伯平均值的 CV 表示,介于 4.4%和 5.4%之间。样品 D 相对于样品 C 的胡伯平均活性为 36.6 IU/vial,CV 为 1.7 %。这些结果证实了连续批次的 BRP 具有良好的连续性。根据这项研究的结果,建议将样品 A 确定为 PKA 的世界卫生组织第 3 IS,效价为 30 IU/安瓿,将样品 D 确定为欧洲药典第 3 IS。白蛋白 BRP 第 7 批中的 PKA,效价为 37 IU/小瓶。样品 B 将作为今后替代世卫组织 IS 的储备样品。
{"title":"Joint WHO/EDQM Collaborative study for the establishment of WHO 3<sup>rd</sup> International Standard and Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation for Prekallikrein activator in albumin batch 7.","authors":"B Fox, E Regourd, P Rigsby, C Longstaff, E Terao","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An international collaborative study was jointly organised by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) to establish the WHO 3<sup>rd</sup> International Standard (IS) for Prekallikrein activator (PKA) and European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) PKA in albumin Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) batch 7. Twenty-six laboratories took part in the study to calibrate these replacement batches, as well as an additional reserve batch for the WHO IS, against the current WHO 2<sup>nd</sup> IS for PKA (02/168). Ph. Eur. PKA in albumin BRP batch 6 was also included to evaluate the continuity of the consecutive batches of BRP. The centrally calculated overall Huber's means based on the results from laboratories with at least two valid assays were 29.6 and 29.6 IU/ampoule for the candidate WHO 3<sup>rd</sup> IS (Sample A) and reserve batch (Sample B), and were 38.4 and 37.0 IU/vial for the current BRP batch 6 (Sample C) and the candidate BRP batch 7 (Sample D). The intra-laboratory variation expressed as coefficient of variation (CV) ranged between 1.4 and 16.6 %. The inter-laboratory variation expressed as CV based on Huber's means ranged between 4.4 and 5.4 %. The Huber's mean activity of Sample D against Sample C was 36.6 IU/vial with a CV of 1.7 %. These results confirm the good continuity of the consecutive batches of BRP. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended to establish Sample A as the WHO 3<sup>rd</sup> IS for PKA with an assigned potency of 30 IU/ampoule and Sample D as the Ph. Eur. PKA in albumin BRP batch 7 with an assigned potency of 37 IU/vial. Sample B is intended to be kept as a future reserve replacement WHO IS.</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"106-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
P Stickings, R Tierney, J Hockley, P Rigsby, E Terao
This publication describes the outcome of a project to develop a replacement European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for Human tetanus immunoglobulin (TIg) as well as for the World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for Tetanus Immunoglobulin, Human. Bulk TIg was kindly provided by a European manufacturer and was used to prepare the candidate standard. The candidate standard was freeze-dried and calibrated in an international collaborative study jointly co-ordinated by the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM, Council of Europe). The results of this study show that there was good agreement between laboratories for the potency estimates obtained for the candidate standard relative to the current WHO IS/Ph. Eur. BRP. The study also demonstrated that the candidate standard is suitable for use in Ph. Eur. assays for potency testing of TIg products and there was good agreement in the potency estimates obtained using the different assay methods included in the study. Accelerated degradation studies performed at the MHRA over a period of 4 years suggest that the freeze-dried candidate standard will be very stable. The candidate standard was established as Ph. Eur. BRP for Human tetanus immunoglobulin, batch 2 with an assigned potency of 45 IU/ampoule. The same preparation was also adopted by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) to serve as the WHO 2nd IS for Tetanus Immunoglobulin, Human (13/240).
{"title":"Collaborative study for the establishment of Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation for Human tetanus immunoglobulin batch 2.","authors":"P Stickings, R Tierney, J Hockley, P Rigsby, E Terao","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This publication describes the outcome of a project to develop a replacement European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for Human tetanus immunoglobulin (TIg) as well as for the World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for Tetanus Immunoglobulin, Human. Bulk TIg was kindly provided by a European manufacturer and was used to prepare the candidate standard. The candidate standard was freeze-dried and calibrated in an international collaborative study jointly co-ordinated by the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM, Council of Europe). The results of this study show that there was good agreement between laboratories for the potency estimates obtained for the candidate standard relative to the current WHO IS/Ph. Eur. BRP. The study also demonstrated that the candidate standard is suitable for use in Ph. Eur. assays for potency testing of TIg products and there was good agreement in the potency estimates obtained using the different assay methods included in the study. Accelerated degradation studies performed at the MHRA over a period of 4 years suggest that the freeze-dried candidate standard will be very stable. The candidate standard was established as Ph. Eur. BRP for Human tetanus immunoglobulin, batch 2 with an assigned potency of 45 IU/ampoule. The same preparation was also adopted by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) to serve as the WHO 2<sup>nd</sup> IS for Tetanus Immunoglobulin, Human (13/240).</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140294864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}