Stakeholders perspectives on perceived needs and priorities for leprosy control and care, Tamil Nadu, India.

Q4 Medicine Indian journal of leprosy Pub Date : 2012-07-01
T Jaeggi, P Manickam, M G Weiss, M D Gupte
{"title":"Stakeholders perspectives on perceived needs and priorities for leprosy control and care, Tamil Nadu, India.","authors":"T Jaeggi,&nbsp;P Manickam,&nbsp;M G Weiss,&nbsp;M D Gupte","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although leprosy has been declared as eliminated in India, treated patients with persisting disabilities still require care. With the shift from vertical to integrated services, questions remain about case detection and maintaining the quality of patient care. We conducted a qualitative study to clarify the perceived status of elimination, patient care and other aspects of leprosy control from the perspective of various stakeholders. We interviewed leprosy programme managers, Non-governmental organization directors, healthcare providers, patients and community leaders from Kanchipuram district, Tamil Nadu. Consensus endorsed the current approach to integration of leprosy in primary healthcare, but healthcare personnel acknowledged problems from shortage of medicines and failure to fill key positions. Patients were concerned about limited clinic hours, long waits and delayed treatment. Disabled patients indicated how they were troubled by stigmatization of their condition. Programme managers mentioned limited support for needed research and some emphasized the potential threat of emerging drug resistance. Although consensus supports an integrated approach for leprosy services in primary care, the relative priority of different aspects of leprosy control vary among stakeholders. Perspectivist approaches to methodologically sound operational research could guide planning for effective case detection and patient care during the post-elimination era.</p>","PeriodicalId":13412,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of leprosy","volume":"84 3","pages":"177-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of leprosy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although leprosy has been declared as eliminated in India, treated patients with persisting disabilities still require care. With the shift from vertical to integrated services, questions remain about case detection and maintaining the quality of patient care. We conducted a qualitative study to clarify the perceived status of elimination, patient care and other aspects of leprosy control from the perspective of various stakeholders. We interviewed leprosy programme managers, Non-governmental organization directors, healthcare providers, patients and community leaders from Kanchipuram district, Tamil Nadu. Consensus endorsed the current approach to integration of leprosy in primary healthcare, but healthcare personnel acknowledged problems from shortage of medicines and failure to fill key positions. Patients were concerned about limited clinic hours, long waits and delayed treatment. Disabled patients indicated how they were troubled by stigmatization of their condition. Programme managers mentioned limited support for needed research and some emphasized the potential threat of emerging drug resistance. Although consensus supports an integrated approach for leprosy services in primary care, the relative priority of different aspects of leprosy control vary among stakeholders. Perspectivist approaches to methodologically sound operational research could guide planning for effective case detection and patient care during the post-elimination era.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益攸关方对麻风病控制和护理的预期需求和优先事项的看法,泰米尔纳德邦,印度。
虽然印度已宣布消灭麻风病,但接受治疗的持续性残疾患者仍然需要护理。随着从垂直服务向综合服务的转变,关于病例发现和保持患者护理质量的问题仍然存在。我们进行了一项定性研究,从各个利益相关者的角度阐明麻风控制的消除、患者护理和其他方面的感知状况。我们采访了来自泰米尔纳德邦坎奇普兰县的麻风病规划管理人员、非政府组织主任、保健提供者、患者和社区领导人。共识赞同目前将麻风病纳入初级卫生保健的做法,但卫生保健人员承认存在药品短缺和关键职位空缺不足等问题。病人担心有限的门诊时间、漫长的等待和延误的治疗。残疾患者表示,他们对自己的身体状况被污名化感到困扰。规划管理人员提到对所需研究的支持有限,一些人强调出现耐药性的潜在威胁。虽然共识支持在初级保健中对麻风服务采取综合方法,但各利益攸关方对麻风控制不同方面的相对重点有所不同。对方法学上合理的运筹学研究的观点主义方法可以指导在消灭后时代有效发现病例和病人护理的规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of leprosy
Indian journal of leprosy Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Leprosy is one of the oldest journals of India published quarterly by Hind Kusht Nivaran Sangh (Indian Leprosy Association) since 1929. The Journal covers all research aspects of leprosy, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases.
期刊最新文献
Dapsone: An Update. Erythema Necroticans - A Case Report. A Traditional NSAID Aspirin along with Clofazimine in Erythema Nodosum Leprosum Reaction: Study of Six Cases. A Breast Lump in an Elderly Lady - Carcinoma or else ?. Correlates of Defaulting from MDT among Leprosy Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1