Does neurocognitive functioning predict future or persistence of ADHD? A systematic review

IF 12.2 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2013-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.02.003

M. van Lieshout , M. Luman , J. Buitelaar , N.N.J. Rommelse , J. Oosterlaan

{"title":"Does neurocognitive functioning predict future or persistence of ADHD? A systematic review","authors":"M. van Lieshout , M. Luman , J. Buitelaar , N.N.J. Rommelse , J. Oosterlaan","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2013.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many children with ADHD remain symptomatic in (young) adulthood. It is important to understand what characterizes this persistent ADHD group. Since ADHD has been associated with neurocognitive dysfunctioning on a variety of neurocognitive domains, and many of these domains are influenced by the same risk genes that influence ADHD, neurocognitive functions are a potential predictor for ADHD persistence. We carried out a systematic literature review on the predictive value of neurocognitive functioning for future ADHD. Based on eighteen studies there was no evidence that either automatically controlled (requiring little mental effort; lower level), or more consciously controlled (requiring high levels of mental effort; higher level) neurocognitive functions differentiated ADHD persistence from remittance. In general, both persisters and remitters showed weaker performance than typically developing controls, although the effect was smaller for remitters. Neurocognitive functions measured in childhood predicted ADHD a few years later, regardless of the type of neurocognitive function. Our findings do not support the model of <span>Halperin and Schulz (2006)</span>, which suggests a maturation of more consciously controlled neurocognitive functions in ADHD remitters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 539-560"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.02.003","citationCount":"120","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735813000287","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 120

Abstract

Many children with ADHD remain symptomatic in (young) adulthood. It is important to understand what characterizes this persistent ADHD group. Since ADHD has been associated with neurocognitive dysfunctioning on a variety of neurocognitive domains, and many of these domains are influenced by the same risk genes that influence ADHD, neurocognitive functions are a potential predictor for ADHD persistence. We carried out a systematic literature review on the predictive value of neurocognitive functioning for future ADHD. Based on eighteen studies there was no evidence that either automatically controlled (requiring little mental effort; lower level), or more consciously controlled (requiring high levels of mental effort; higher level) neurocognitive functions differentiated ADHD persistence from remittance. In general, both persisters and remitters showed weaker performance than typically developing controls, although the effect was smaller for remitters. Neurocognitive functions measured in childhood predicted ADHD a few years later, regardless of the type of neurocognitive function. Our findings do not support the model of Halperin and Schulz (2006), which suggests a maturation of more consciously controlled neurocognitive functions in ADHD remitters.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

神经认知功能能否预测ADHD的未来或持续性?系统回顾

许多患有多动症的儿童在成年后仍有症状。了解这种持续性多动症的特点是很重要的。由于ADHD与多种神经认知领域的神经认知功能障碍有关，而这些领域中的许多领域受到影响ADHD的相同风险基因的影响，因此神经认知功能是ADHD持续性的潜在预测因子。我们对神经认知功能对未来ADHD的预测价值进行了系统的文献回顾。根据18项研究，没有证据表明自动控制(需要很少的精神努力;较低水平)，或更有意识地控制(需要高水平的精神努力;更高水平的神经认知功能将ADHD持续性与汇款区分开来。总的来说，持续者和缓解者的表现都比典型的发展控制组弱，尽管缓解者的影响较小。无论神经认知功能的类型如何，在儿童时期测量的神经认知功能可以预测几年后的多动症。我们的发现不支持Halperin和Schulz(2006)的模型，该模型表明ADHD缓解者更有意识地控制神经认知功能的成熟。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

23.10

自引率

1.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.