[Resource-oriented assessment using the German Competence Analysis Questionnaire (Kompetenzanalyseverfahren, KANN) - verification of the KANN's validity as measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL/4-18) in the context of child and youth welfare].

Martina Suing, Franz Petermann, Martin H Schmidt, Jan Jäger, Judith Sinzig
{"title":"[Resource-oriented assessment using the German Competence Analysis Questionnaire (Kompetenzanalyseverfahren, KANN) - verification of the KANN's validity as measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL/4-18) in the context of child and youth welfare].","authors":"Martina Suing,&nbsp;Franz Petermann,&nbsp;Martin H Schmidt,&nbsp;Jan Jäger,&nbsp;Judith Sinzig","doi":"10.1024/1422-4917/a000231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The German Competence Analysis Questionnaire (Kompetenzanalyseverfahren, KANN) is an external assessment tool used to determine observable personal resources (= competences) in children and adolescents. The present paper examines the validity of the KANN based on additionally collected data of behavior disorders as measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL/4-18). The main objective is to explore whether the KANN scales are able to differentiate between children and adolescents with or without internalizing and/or externalizing behavior disorders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consists of n = 450 young people (aged 6 to 22 years) under the care of child and youth welfare services assessed between 2010 and 2012 by their group careworkers using KANN and CBCL as part of the ongoing quality development system \"moses.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the discriminant analysis the KANN scale \"Empathy & Fairness\" differentiates very well between youths with or without behavior disorders, particularly those with externalizing problems. The KANN scale \"Leisure Behavior & Peer Groups\" contributes the highest rate of differentiation of internalizing problems. The hit ratios of the discriminant analyses reach values of up to 76.2 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ability of the KANN scales to differentiate behavior disorders underlines the validity of the KANN.</p>","PeriodicalId":54189,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Kinder-Und Jugendpsychiatrie Und Psychotherapie","volume":"41 3","pages":"181-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Kinder-Und Jugendpsychiatrie Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1422-4917/a000231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: The German Competence Analysis Questionnaire (Kompetenzanalyseverfahren, KANN) is an external assessment tool used to determine observable personal resources (= competences) in children and adolescents. The present paper examines the validity of the KANN based on additionally collected data of behavior disorders as measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL/4-18). The main objective is to explore whether the KANN scales are able to differentiate between children and adolescents with or without internalizing and/or externalizing behavior disorders.

Method: The sample consists of n = 450 young people (aged 6 to 22 years) under the care of child and youth welfare services assessed between 2010 and 2012 by their group careworkers using KANN and CBCL as part of the ongoing quality development system "moses."

Results: According to the discriminant analysis the KANN scale "Empathy & Fairness" differentiates very well between youths with or without behavior disorders, particularly those with externalizing problems. The KANN scale "Leisure Behavior & Peer Groups" contributes the highest rate of differentiation of internalizing problems. The hit ratios of the discriminant analyses reach values of up to 76.2 %.

Conclusions: The ability of the KANN scales to differentiate behavior disorders underlines the validity of the KANN.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[使用德国能力分析问卷(Kompetenzanalyseverfahren, KANN)进行资源导向评估-在儿童和青少年福利背景下,通过儿童行为检查表(CBCL/4-18)验证KANN的有效性]。
目的:德国能力分析问卷(Kompetenzanalyseverfahren, KANN)是一种外部评估工具,用于确定儿童和青少年可观察到的个人资源(=能力)。本论文基于儿童行为检查表(CBCL/4-18)测量的额外收集的行为障碍数据来检验KANN的有效性。主要目的是探讨KANN量表是否能够区分有或没有内化和/或外化行为障碍的儿童和青少年。方法:样本由n = 450名青少年(6至22岁)组成,他们在2010年至2012年期间接受儿童和青少年福利服务机构的照顾,由他们的团体看护人员使用KANN和CBCL作为持续质量发展体系“moses”的一部分进行评估。结果:根据判别分析,KANN量表“移情与公平”在有或没有行为障碍的青少年,特别是有外化问题的青少年之间有很好的区分。KANN量表“休闲行为与同伴群体”对内化问题的区分率最高。判别分析的命中率高达76.2%。结论:KANN量表区分行为障碍的能力强调了KANN量表的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift veröffentlicht Originalarbeiten, Übersichtsreferate, Fallberichte, aktuelle Mitteilungen und Buchbesprechungen und informiert laufend über die Arbeit anderer internationaler Fachzeitschriften. Sie ist offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie.
期刊最新文献
Die Entwicklung der Suizidzahlen von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland von 2005 bis 2023. Inwiefern verändern sich psychiatrische Prävalenz und Belastungsgrad der Klientel stationärer Jugendhilfe in der Schweiz? Analyzing Access to Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Care Institutes in Germany Based on Driving Time. Veränderung der Inanspruchnahme in einem flexiblen und integrierten Modellvorhaben einer Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie nach § 64b SGB V. Wie können wir die Versorgung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit psychischen Erkrankungen bestmöglich steuern?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1