Meta-Analysis of Stem Cell Therapy in Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2013-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.021
Jagdesh Kandala MD, MPH , Gaurav A. Upadhyay MD , Evgeny Pokushalov MD, PhD , Sean Wu MD, PhD , Douglas E. Drachman MD , Jagmeet P. Singh MD, DPhil
{"title":"Meta-Analysis of Stem Cell Therapy in Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy","authors":"Jagdesh Kandala MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Gaurav A. Upadhyay MD ,&nbsp;Evgeny Pokushalov MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sean Wu MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Douglas E. Drachman MD ,&nbsp;Jagmeet P. Singh MD, DPhil","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Studies investigating bone marrow stem cell therapy (BMSCT) </span>in patients<span> with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy have yielded mixed results. A meta-analysis of </span></span>randomized controlled trials<span><span> of BMSCT in patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy was undertaken to assess its efficacy and the best route of administration. The MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing &amp; Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through April 2012 for randomized controlled trials that investigated the impact of BMSCT and its route of administration on left ventricular (LV) function in patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy and systolic dysfunction<span><span>. Of the 226 reports identified, 10 randomized controlled trials including 519 patients (average LV ejection fraction [LVEF] at baseline 32 ± 7%) were included in the analysis. On the basis of a random-effects model, BMSCT improved the </span>LVEF at 6 months by 4.48% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.43% to 6.53%, p = 0.0001). A greater improvement in the LVEF was seen with intramyocardial injection compared with </span></span>intracoronary infusion<span> (5.13% [95% CI 3.17% to 7.10%], p &lt;0.00001, vs 2.32% [95% CI −2.06% to 6.70%], p = 0.30). Overall, there were reductions in LV end-systolic volume of −20.64 ml (95% CI −33.21 to −8.07, p = 0.001) and LV end-diastolic volume of −16.71 ml (95% CI −31.36 to −2.06, p = 0.03). In conclusion, stem cell therapy may improve LVEF and favorably remodel the heart in patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy. On the basis of current limited data, intramyocardial injection may be superior to intracoronary infusion in patients with LV systolic dysfunction.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"112 2","pages":"Pages 217-225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.021","citationCount":"84","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914913008175","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

Abstract

Studies investigating bone marrow stem cell therapy (BMSCT) in patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy have yielded mixed results. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of BMSCT in patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy was undertaken to assess its efficacy and the best route of administration. The MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through April 2012 for randomized controlled trials that investigated the impact of BMSCT and its route of administration on left ventricular (LV) function in patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy and systolic dysfunction. Of the 226 reports identified, 10 randomized controlled trials including 519 patients (average LV ejection fraction [LVEF] at baseline 32 ± 7%) were included in the analysis. On the basis of a random-effects model, BMSCT improved the LVEF at 6 months by 4.48% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.43% to 6.53%, p = 0.0001). A greater improvement in the LVEF was seen with intramyocardial injection compared with intracoronary infusion (5.13% [95% CI 3.17% to 7.10%], p <0.00001, vs 2.32% [95% CI −2.06% to 6.70%], p = 0.30). Overall, there were reductions in LV end-systolic volume of −20.64 ml (95% CI −33.21 to −8.07, p = 0.001) and LV end-diastolic volume of −16.71 ml (95% CI −31.36 to −2.06, p = 0.03). In conclusion, stem cell therapy may improve LVEF and favorably remodel the heart in patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy. On the basis of current limited data, intramyocardial injection may be superior to intracoronary infusion in patients with LV systolic dysfunction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干细胞治疗慢性缺血性心肌病的meta分析
研究骨髓干细胞治疗(BMSCT)对慢性缺血性心肌病患者的疗效好坏参半。对BMSCT治疗慢性缺血性心肌病患者的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析,以评估其疗效和最佳给药途径。MEDLINE, Embase,护理累积指数联合健康文献(Allied Health Literature)和Cochrane Library数据库检索了截至2012年4月的随机对照试验,这些试验研究了BMSCT及其给药途径对慢性缺血性心肌病和收缩功能障碍患者左心室(LV)功能的影响。在确定的226份报告中,10项随机对照试验纳入了519例患者(平均左室射血分数[LVEF]基线为32±7%)。在随机效应模型的基础上,BMSCT在6个月时将LVEF提高了4.48%(95%置信区间[CI] 2.43%至6.53%,p = 0.0001)。与冠状动脉内灌注相比,心肌内注射对LVEF的改善更大(5.13% [95% CI 3.17%至7.10%],p <0.00001, vs 2.32% [95% CI−2.06%至6.70%],p = 0.30)。总体而言,左室收缩末期容积减少20.64 ml (95% CI - 33.21 ~ - 8.07, p = 0.001),左室舒张末期容积减少- 16.71 ml (95% CI - 31.36 ~ - 2.06, p = 0.03)。总之,干细胞治疗可以改善慢性缺血性心肌病患者的LVEF并有利地重塑心脏。根据目前有限的数据,在左室收缩功能障碍患者中,心肌内注射可能优于冠状动脉内输液。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
期刊最新文献
Femoropopliteal Artery Atherectomy for Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease in the XLPAD Registry. Cardiogenic Shock: A State-of-the-Art Review. Death Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Data from the PROGRESS-COMPLICATIONS registry. Atrial Arrhythmia Incidence and Outcomes in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Long-Term Efficacy of Mavacamten in Reducing Left Ventricular Mass in a Multi-Ethnic Cohort with Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1