Information Extraction for Clinical Data Mining: A Mammography Case Study.

Houssam Nassif, Ryan Woods, Elizabeth Burnside, Mehmet Ayvaci, Jude Shavlik, David Page
{"title":"Information Extraction for Clinical Data Mining: A Mammography Case Study.","authors":"Houssam Nassif, Ryan Woods, Elizabeth Burnside, Mehmet Ayvaci, Jude Shavlik, David Page","doi":"10.1109/icdmw.2009.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in women between the ages of 15 and 54. During mammography screening, radiologists use a strict lexicon (BI-RADS) to describe and report their findings. Mammography records are then stored in a well-defined database format (NMD). Lately, researchers have applied data mining and machine learning techniques to these databases. They successfully built breast cancer classifiers that can help in early detection of malignancy. However, the validity of these models depends on the quality of the underlying databases. Unfortunately, most databases suffer from inconsistencies, missing data, inter-observer variability and inappropriate term usage. In addition, many databases are not compliant with the NMD format and/or solely consist of text reports. BI-RADS feature extraction from free text and consistency checks between recorded predictive variables and text reports are crucial to addressing this problem. We describe a general scheme for concept information retrieval from free text given a lexicon, and present a BI-RADS features extraction algorithm for clinical data mining. It consists of a syntax analyzer, a concept finder and a negation detector. The syntax analyzer preprocesses the input into individual sentences. The concept finder uses a semantic grammar based on the BI-RADS lexicon and the experts' input. It parses sentences detecting BI-RADS concepts. Once a concept is located, a lexical scanner checks for negation. Our method can handle multiple latent concepts within the text, filtering out ultrasound concepts. On our dataset, our algorithm achieves 97.7% precision, 95.5% recall and an <i>F</i><sub>1</sub>-score of 0.97. It outperforms manual feature extraction at the 5% statistical significance level.</p>","PeriodicalId":74565,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3676897/pdf/nihms464344.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/icdmw.2009.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in women between the ages of 15 and 54. During mammography screening, radiologists use a strict lexicon (BI-RADS) to describe and report their findings. Mammography records are then stored in a well-defined database format (NMD). Lately, researchers have applied data mining and machine learning techniques to these databases. They successfully built breast cancer classifiers that can help in early detection of malignancy. However, the validity of these models depends on the quality of the underlying databases. Unfortunately, most databases suffer from inconsistencies, missing data, inter-observer variability and inappropriate term usage. In addition, many databases are not compliant with the NMD format and/or solely consist of text reports. BI-RADS feature extraction from free text and consistency checks between recorded predictive variables and text reports are crucial to addressing this problem. We describe a general scheme for concept information retrieval from free text given a lexicon, and present a BI-RADS features extraction algorithm for clinical data mining. It consists of a syntax analyzer, a concept finder and a negation detector. The syntax analyzer preprocesses the input into individual sentences. The concept finder uses a semantic grammar based on the BI-RADS lexicon and the experts' input. It parses sentences detecting BI-RADS concepts. Once a concept is located, a lexical scanner checks for negation. Our method can handle multiple latent concepts within the text, filtering out ultrasound concepts. On our dataset, our algorithm achieves 97.7% precision, 95.5% recall and an F1-score of 0.97. It outperforms manual feature extraction at the 5% statistical significance level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床数据挖掘的信息提取:乳腺放射摄影案例研究
乳腺癌是 15 至 54 岁女性癌症死亡的主要原因。在乳腺 X 射线检查过程中,放射科医生使用严格的词典(BI-RADS)来描述和报告检查结果。然后,乳腺 X 射线检查记录被存储在一个定义明确的数据库格式(NMD)中。最近,研究人员将数据挖掘和机器学习技术应用于这些数据库。他们成功建立了乳腺癌分类器,有助于早期发现恶性肿瘤。然而,这些模型的有效性取决于基础数据库的质量。遗憾的是,大多数数据库都存在不一致、数据缺失、观察者间差异和术语使用不当等问题。此外,许多数据库不符合 NMD 格式和/或仅由文本报告组成。从自由文本中提取 BI-RADS 特征,并对记录的预测变量和文本报告进行一致性检查,是解决这一问题的关键。我们描述了从自由文本中提取概念信息的一般方案,并给出了用于临床数据挖掘的 BI-RADS 特征提取算法。该算法由语法分析器、概念查找器和否定检测器组成。语法分析器将输入预处理为单个句子。概念查找器使用基于 BI-RADS 词典和专家输入的语义语法。它对句子进行解析,检测 BI-RADS 概念。一旦找到一个概念,词法扫描器就会检查否定。我们的方法可以处理文本中的多个潜在概念,过滤掉超声波概念。在我们的数据集上,我们的算法达到了 97.7% 的精确度、95.5% 的召回率和 0.97 的 F1 分数。在 5%的统计显著性水平上,它优于人工特征提取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Personalized Healthcare via Capturing Disease Severity, Interaction, and Progression. Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation with Subpopulation Identification for Personalized Medicine in Opioid Use Disorder. RoS-KD: A Robust Stochastic Knowledge Distillation Approach for Noisy Medical Imaging. Robust Unsupervised Domain Adaptation from A Corrupted Source. Communication Efficient Tensor Factorization for Decentralized Healthcare Networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1