Risk factors for coronary drug-eluting stent thrombosis: influence of procedural, patient, lesion, and stent related factors and dual antiplatelet therapy.

ISRN cardiology Pub Date : 2013-06-23 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/748736
Krishnankutty Sudhir, James B Hermiller, Joanne M Ferguson, Charles A Simonton
{"title":"Risk factors for coronary drug-eluting stent thrombosis: influence of procedural, patient, lesion, and stent related factors and dual antiplatelet therapy.","authors":"Krishnankutty Sudhir,&nbsp;James B Hermiller,&nbsp;Joanne M Ferguson,&nbsp;Charles A Simonton","doi":"10.1155/2013/748736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The complication of stent thrombosis (ST) emerged at a rate of 0.5% annually for first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), often presenting as death or myocardial infarction. Procedural factors such as stent underexpansion and malapposition are risk factors for ST in patients. The type of lesion being treated and lesion morphology also influence healing after treatment with DES and can contribute to ST. Second-generation DES such as the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent differ from the first-generation stents with respect to antiproliferative agents, coating technologies, and stent frame. Improvements in stent structure have resulted in a more complete endothelialization, thereby decreasing the incidence of ST. Bioresorbable scaffolds show promise for restoring vasomotor function and minimizing rates of very late ST. Post-PCI treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel for a year is currently the standard of care for DES, but high-risk patients may benefit from more potent antiplatelet agents. The optimal duration of DAPT for DES is currently unclear and will be addressed in large-scale randomized clinical trials. </p>","PeriodicalId":73519,"journal":{"name":"ISRN cardiology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"748736"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/748736","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/748736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The complication of stent thrombosis (ST) emerged at a rate of 0.5% annually for first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), often presenting as death or myocardial infarction. Procedural factors such as stent underexpansion and malapposition are risk factors for ST in patients. The type of lesion being treated and lesion morphology also influence healing after treatment with DES and can contribute to ST. Second-generation DES such as the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent differ from the first-generation stents with respect to antiproliferative agents, coating technologies, and stent frame. Improvements in stent structure have resulted in a more complete endothelialization, thereby decreasing the incidence of ST. Bioresorbable scaffolds show promise for restoring vasomotor function and minimizing rates of very late ST. Post-PCI treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel for a year is currently the standard of care for DES, but high-risk patients may benefit from more potent antiplatelet agents. The optimal duration of DAPT for DES is currently unclear and will be addressed in large-scale randomized clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉药物洗脱支架血栓形成的危险因素:手术、患者、病变和支架相关因素的影响以及双重抗血小板治疗
第一代药物洗脱支架(DES)的支架血栓(ST)并发症发生率为每年0.5%,通常表现为死亡或心肌梗死。手术因素如支架扩张不足和错位是ST患者的危险因素。被治疗的病变类型和病变形态也会影响DES治疗后的愈合,并可能导致st。第二代DES,如XIENCE V依维莫司洗脱支架,在抗增殖药物、涂层技术和支架框架方面与第一代支架不同。支架结构的改进导致了更完全的内皮化,从而降低了st的发生率。生物可吸收支架有望恢复血管舒张功能,并将晚期st的发生率降至最低。pci后使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗一年是目前DES的标准治疗方案,但高风险患者可能受益于更有效的抗血小板药物。DAPT治疗DES的最佳持续时间目前尚不清楚,将在大规模随机临床试验中解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Elective and Emergent Setting in a Pooled Population of 37,781 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mouse bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells do not restore radiation-induced microvascular damage. Abdominal aortic aneurysms and coronary artery disease in a small country with high cardiovascular burden. Exclusion of left atrial appendage thrombus using single phase coronary computed tomography as compared to transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Myocardial injury in critically ill children: a case control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1