Exclusion of left atrial appendage thrombus using single phase coronary computed tomography as compared to transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation.

ISRN cardiology Pub Date : 2014-02-20 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/838727
Jason Saucedo, Shaun Martinho, Dianne Frankel, Ahmad M Slim, Robert E Eckart
{"title":"Exclusion of left atrial appendage thrombus using single phase coronary computed tomography as compared to transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation.","authors":"Jason Saucedo,&nbsp;Shaun Martinho,&nbsp;Dianne Frankel,&nbsp;Ahmad M Slim,&nbsp;Robert E Eckart","doi":"10.1155/2014/838727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is used for the evaluation of the presence of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus prior to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), while coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is used for anatomic mapping during PVI. Methods. We compared the diagnostic performance of single phase CCTA to TEE in excluding the presence of LAA thrombus in patients undergoing PVI in 172 subjects performed during index hospitalization. Results. The mean age was 51 ± 13 years, a median CHADS2 score of 1 [IQR25,75 0,1, range 0-3] and a mean periprocedural INR of 2.1 ± 0.6. The prevalence of an LAA filling defect on single phase CCTA was 9.3% (6/183) and on TEE was 1.2% (2/183). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100% (95% CI, 19.8-100%), 91.8% (95% CI, 94-99%), 12.5% (95% CI, 60-76%), and 91.8% (95% CI, 97-100%) for the detection of LAA filling defect, respectively. Conclusion. Given the utility of a preprocedural single phase CCTA for the performance of PVI, the absence of a filling defect negates the need for a subsequent TEE as an adjunct for exclusion of LAA thrombus. </p>","PeriodicalId":73519,"journal":{"name":"ISRN cardiology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"838727"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/838727","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/838727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is used for the evaluation of the presence of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus prior to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), while coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is used for anatomic mapping during PVI. Methods. We compared the diagnostic performance of single phase CCTA to TEE in excluding the presence of LAA thrombus in patients undergoing PVI in 172 subjects performed during index hospitalization. Results. The mean age was 51 ± 13 years, a median CHADS2 score of 1 [IQR25,75 0,1, range 0-3] and a mean periprocedural INR of 2.1 ± 0.6. The prevalence of an LAA filling defect on single phase CCTA was 9.3% (6/183) and on TEE was 1.2% (2/183). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100% (95% CI, 19.8-100%), 91.8% (95% CI, 94-99%), 12.5% (95% CI, 60-76%), and 91.8% (95% CI, 97-100%) for the detection of LAA filling defect, respectively. Conclusion. Given the utility of a preprocedural single phase CCTA for the performance of PVI, the absence of a filling defect negates the need for a subsequent TEE as an adjunct for exclusion of LAA thrombus.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在接受肺静脉隔离的患者中,用单相冠状动脉计算机断层扫描与经食管超声心动图比较左房附件血栓的排除。
背景。经食管超声心动图(TEE)用于在肺静脉隔离(PVI)之前评估左心耳(LAA)血栓的存在,而冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)用于PVI期间的解剖制图。方法。我们比较了172例住院期间接受PVI治疗的患者中,单相CCTA和TEE在排除LAA血栓方面的诊断性能。结果。平均年龄为51±13岁,CHADS2评分中位数为1 [IQR25,75,1,范围0-3],平均围手术期INR为2.1±0.6。单期CCTA的LAA填充缺损发生率为9.3% (6/183),TEE为1.2%(2/183)。检测LAA填充缺损的敏感性为100% (95% CI, 19.8 ~ 100%),特异性为91.8% (95% CI, 94 ~ 99%),阳性预测值为12.5% (95% CI, 60 ~ 76%),阴性预测值为91.8% (95% CI, 97 ~ 100%)。结论。考虑到术前单相CCTA对PVI表现的效用,没有充盈缺陷就不需要后续TEE作为排除LAA血栓的辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Elective and Emergent Setting in a Pooled Population of 37,781 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mouse bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells do not restore radiation-induced microvascular damage. Abdominal aortic aneurysms and coronary artery disease in a small country with high cardiovascular burden. Exclusion of left atrial appendage thrombus using single phase coronary computed tomography as compared to transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Myocardial injury in critically ill children: a case control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1