Exclusion of left atrial appendage thrombus using single phase coronary computed tomography as compared to transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation.
Jason Saucedo, Shaun Martinho, Dianne Frankel, Ahmad M Slim, Robert E Eckart
{"title":"Exclusion of left atrial appendage thrombus using single phase coronary computed tomography as compared to transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation.","authors":"Jason Saucedo, Shaun Martinho, Dianne Frankel, Ahmad M Slim, Robert E Eckart","doi":"10.1155/2014/838727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is used for the evaluation of the presence of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus prior to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), while coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is used for anatomic mapping during PVI. Methods. We compared the diagnostic performance of single phase CCTA to TEE in excluding the presence of LAA thrombus in patients undergoing PVI in 172 subjects performed during index hospitalization. Results. The mean age was 51 ± 13 years, a median CHADS2 score of 1 [IQR25,75 0,1, range 0-3] and a mean periprocedural INR of 2.1 ± 0.6. The prevalence of an LAA filling defect on single phase CCTA was 9.3% (6/183) and on TEE was 1.2% (2/183). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100% (95% CI, 19.8-100%), 91.8% (95% CI, 94-99%), 12.5% (95% CI, 60-76%), and 91.8% (95% CI, 97-100%) for the detection of LAA filling defect, respectively. Conclusion. Given the utility of a preprocedural single phase CCTA for the performance of PVI, the absence of a filling defect negates the need for a subsequent TEE as an adjunct for exclusion of LAA thrombus. </p>","PeriodicalId":73519,"journal":{"name":"ISRN cardiology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"838727"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/838727","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/838727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Background. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is used for the evaluation of the presence of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus prior to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), while coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is used for anatomic mapping during PVI. Methods. We compared the diagnostic performance of single phase CCTA to TEE in excluding the presence of LAA thrombus in patients undergoing PVI in 172 subjects performed during index hospitalization. Results. The mean age was 51 ± 13 years, a median CHADS2 score of 1 [IQR25,75 0,1, range 0-3] and a mean periprocedural INR of 2.1 ± 0.6. The prevalence of an LAA filling defect on single phase CCTA was 9.3% (6/183) and on TEE was 1.2% (2/183). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100% (95% CI, 19.8-100%), 91.8% (95% CI, 94-99%), 12.5% (95% CI, 60-76%), and 91.8% (95% CI, 97-100%) for the detection of LAA filling defect, respectively. Conclusion. Given the utility of a preprocedural single phase CCTA for the performance of PVI, the absence of a filling defect negates the need for a subsequent TEE as an adjunct for exclusion of LAA thrombus.