Influence of fludarabine on the pharmacokinetics of oral busulfan during pretransplant conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2013-11-01 Epub Date: 2013-08-19 DOI:10.1002/jcph.130
Francine Attié de Castro, Vera Lucia Lanchote, Julio Cesar Voltarelli, Virgílio Antônio Rensi Colturato, Belinda Pinto Simões
{"title":"Influence of fludarabine on the pharmacokinetics of oral busulfan during pretransplant conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.","authors":"Francine Attié de Castro,&nbsp;Vera Lucia Lanchote,&nbsp;Julio Cesar Voltarelli,&nbsp;Virgílio Antônio Rensi Colturato,&nbsp;Belinda Pinto Simões","doi":"10.1002/jcph.130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the influence of fludarabine on the pharmacokinetics of busulfan administered orally to patients receiving a conditioning regimen for hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Twenty-six patients treated with oral busulfan (1 mg/kg/6 h for 4 days) were divided into two groups according to the concomitant administration of fludarabine (n = 11; 30 mg/m(2) for 5 days) or subsequent administration of cyclophosphamide (n = 15; 60 mg/kg for 2 days). Serial blood samples were collected on Day 4 of busulfan administration. Plasma busulfan concentrations were determined by HPLC-UV and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the WinNonlin program. Patients concomitantly treated with fludarabine showed reduced apparent clearance of busulfan (110.5 mL/h/kg vs. 157.4 mL/h/kg) and higher AUC0-6 (area under the plasma concentrations vs. time curve) than patients subsequently treated with cyclophosphamide (7.9 µg h/mL vs. 5.7 µg h/mL). No association was observed between busulfan AUC0-6 and clinical evolution of the patients. Although plasma busulfan concentrations were higher in patients receiving concomitant fludarabine, myelosuppression-related toxicity was less frequent than in patients treated with busulfan and cyclophosphamide. The results suggest that patients treated with fludarabine should receive 30% lower busulfan doses during conditioning protocols for HSCT. </p>","PeriodicalId":15536,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"53 11","pages":"1205-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jcph.130","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of fludarabine on the pharmacokinetics of busulfan administered orally to patients receiving a conditioning regimen for hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Twenty-six patients treated with oral busulfan (1 mg/kg/6 h for 4 days) were divided into two groups according to the concomitant administration of fludarabine (n = 11; 30 mg/m(2) for 5 days) or subsequent administration of cyclophosphamide (n = 15; 60 mg/kg for 2 days). Serial blood samples were collected on Day 4 of busulfan administration. Plasma busulfan concentrations were determined by HPLC-UV and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the WinNonlin program. Patients concomitantly treated with fludarabine showed reduced apparent clearance of busulfan (110.5 mL/h/kg vs. 157.4 mL/h/kg) and higher AUC0-6 (area under the plasma concentrations vs. time curve) than patients subsequently treated with cyclophosphamide (7.9 µg h/mL vs. 5.7 µg h/mL). No association was observed between busulfan AUC0-6 and clinical evolution of the patients. Although plasma busulfan concentrations were higher in patients receiving concomitant fludarabine, myelosuppression-related toxicity was less frequent than in patients treated with busulfan and cyclophosphamide. The results suggest that patients treated with fludarabine should receive 30% lower busulfan doses during conditioning protocols for HSCT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氟达拉滨对口服布苏凡在造血干细胞移植移植前调节过程中药代动力学的影响。
本研究评估了氟达拉滨对接受造血异体干细胞移植(HSCT)调节方案的患者口服布苏凡药代动力学的影响。26例口服布苏凡(1 mg/kg/6 h,连用4天)患者根据同时使用氟达拉滨的情况分为两组(n = 11;30 mg/m(2),持续5天)或随后给药环磷酰胺(n = 15;60 mg/kg,连续2天)。在给药第4天采集连续血液样本。采用高效液相色谱-紫外分光光度法测定血药浓度,WinNonlin程序计算药动学参数。与随后接受环磷酰胺治疗的患者相比,同时接受氟达拉滨治疗的患者对busulfan的表观清除率降低(110.5 mL/h/kg vs 157.4 mL/h/kg), AUC0-6(血浆浓度与时间曲线下面积)更高(7.9µg h/mL vs 5.7µg h/mL)。布苏芬AUC0-6与患者的临床进展无关联。虽然同时接受氟达拉滨治疗的患者血浆中布磺胺浓度较高,但与布磺胺和环磷酰胺治疗的患者相比,骨髓抑制相关的毒性较低。结果表明,接受氟达拉滨治疗的患者在HSCT的调节方案中应减少30%的丁硫芬剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
176
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Natural History and Real-World Data in Rare Diseases: Applications, Limitations, and Future Perspectives. Overview of Clinical Pharmacology Packages of New Drug Applications Approved for the Treatment of Rare Diseases. Regulatory Framework for Drug Development in Rare Diseases. Bridging the Gap With Clinical Pharmacology in Innovative Rare Disease Treatment Modalities: Targeting DNA to RNA to Protein. Think Rare, Think Inside and Out: Simple Question-Based Approach to Complex Rare Disease Drug Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1