Malignant thyroid bed mass after total thyroidectomy.

Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Pub Date : 2013-09-01 Epub Date: 2013-08-26 DOI:10.4174/jkss.2013.85.3.97
Do Sung Park, Jin Seong Cho, Min Ho Park, Young Jae Ryu, Min Jung Hwang, Sun Hyung Shin, Hee Kyung Kim, Hyo Soon Lim, Ji Shin Lee, Jung Han Yoon
{"title":"Malignant thyroid bed mass after total thyroidectomy.","authors":"Do Sung Park,&nbsp;Jin Seong Cho,&nbsp;Min Ho Park,&nbsp;Young Jae Ryu,&nbsp;Min Jung Hwang,&nbsp;Sun Hyung Shin,&nbsp;Hee Kyung Kim,&nbsp;Hyo Soon Lim,&nbsp;Ji Shin Lee,&nbsp;Jung Han Yoon","doi":"10.4174/jkss.2013.85.3.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ultrasonographic (US) criteria on malignant thyroid bed mass have been suggested, including taller than wide shape, loss of echogenic hilum, abnormal vascularity, and microcalcification. The relationship between fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology findings and US findings on thyroid bed mass is unknown. We have retrospectively assessed the malignant thyroid bed mass after total thyroidectomy due to papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated 2,048 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy due to PTC. FNA was performed in 97 patients on the thyroid bed under US surveillance. The 97 suspicious thyroid bed masses were divided into two groups: metastatic thyroid bed group (n = 34) and nonmetastatic group (n = 63). The groups were evaluated according to various clinical, serologic, and US findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within a median 47.0 months of follow-up, the proportion of malignant thyroid bed mass was high in large tumor size (1.37 cm vs. 1.03 cm), isthmic position (10.3% vs. 3.9%), and previous N1a (55.9% vs. 34.9%). US findings revealed that the presence of microcalcification or macrocalcification (47.1% vs. 19.0%) and thyroid bed mass height (5.4 mm vs. 3.9 mm) were the only discriminable criteria for central compartment recurrence. But, degree of echogenicity, loss of hilum, and irregularity of margin failed to discriminate malignant thyroid bed mass.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US findings on malignant thyroid bed mass were different from previously reported general criteria on lateral metastatic nodes. Additional FNA cytology should be performed on patients, even low-risk patients, who present the above findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.3.97","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.3.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasonographic (US) criteria on malignant thyroid bed mass have been suggested, including taller than wide shape, loss of echogenic hilum, abnormal vascularity, and microcalcification. The relationship between fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology findings and US findings on thyroid bed mass is unknown. We have retrospectively assessed the malignant thyroid bed mass after total thyroidectomy due to papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 2,048 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy due to PTC. FNA was performed in 97 patients on the thyroid bed under US surveillance. The 97 suspicious thyroid bed masses were divided into two groups: metastatic thyroid bed group (n = 34) and nonmetastatic group (n = 63). The groups were evaluated according to various clinical, serologic, and US findings.

Results: Within a median 47.0 months of follow-up, the proportion of malignant thyroid bed mass was high in large tumor size (1.37 cm vs. 1.03 cm), isthmic position (10.3% vs. 3.9%), and previous N1a (55.9% vs. 34.9%). US findings revealed that the presence of microcalcification or macrocalcification (47.1% vs. 19.0%) and thyroid bed mass height (5.4 mm vs. 3.9 mm) were the only discriminable criteria for central compartment recurrence. But, degree of echogenicity, loss of hilum, and irregularity of margin failed to discriminate malignant thyroid bed mass.

Conclusion: US findings on malignant thyroid bed mass were different from previously reported general criteria on lateral metastatic nodes. Additional FNA cytology should be performed on patients, even low-risk patients, who present the above findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺全切除术后恶性甲状腺床肿块。
目的:提出了恶性甲状腺床肿块的超声诊断标准,包括高过宽型、回声门缺失、血管异常和微钙化。细针穿刺(FNA)细胞学检查结果与甲状腺床肿块的超声检查结果之间的关系尚不清楚。我们回顾性评估了甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)全甲状腺切除术后的恶性甲状腺床肿块。方法:我们回顾性评估2,048例因PTC而行甲状腺全切除术的患者。97例患者在美国监护下在甲状腺床上进行FNA。将97例可疑甲状腺床肿块分为转移性甲状腺床组(n = 34)和非转移性甲状腺床组(n = 63)。根据各种临床、血清学和超声检查结果对各组进行评估。结果:在中位47.0个月的随访中,大肿瘤(1.37 cm vs 1.03 cm)、峡部位置(10.3% vs 3.9%)和既往N1a (55.9% vs 34.9%)中恶性甲状腺床肿块的比例较高。美国的研究结果显示,微钙化或大钙化的存在(47.1%对19.0%)和甲状腺床块高度(5.4 mm对3.9 mm)是判别中央室复发的唯一标准。但回声程度、门部缺失和边缘不规则未能鉴别恶性甲状腺床肿块。结论:恶性甲状腺床肿块的美国发现不同于以前报道的一般标准侧转移淋巴结。对于出现上述结果的患者,即使是低风险患者,也应进行额外的FNA细胞学检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Matrix Metalloproteinase 41 : inside the presidency of George H.W. Bush Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in mucosal gastric cancer and re-evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection The optimal follow-up period in patients with above 5-year disease-free survival after curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1