Inguinal hernia developed after radical retropubic surgery for prostate cancer.

Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Pub Date : 2013-10-01 Epub Date: 2013-09-30 DOI:10.4174/jkss.2013.85.4.175
Choon Sik Chung, Gyu Young Jeong, Seung Han Kim, Dong Keun Lee
{"title":"Inguinal hernia developed after radical retropubic surgery for prostate cancer.","authors":"Choon Sik Chung,&nbsp;Gyu Young Jeong,&nbsp;Seung Han Kim,&nbsp;Dong Keun Lee","doi":"10.4174/jkss.2013.85.4.175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of inguinal hernia developed after radical retropubic surgery for prostate cancer to the hernia without previous radical prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three patients (group A) who had radical retropubic surgery for prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic or open tension-free inguinal hernia repair from March 2007 to February 2011. Nine hundred and forty patients (group B) without previous radical retropubic surgery received laparoscopic or tension-free open hernia operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A was older than group B (mean ± standard deviation, 69.6 ± 7.2 vs. 54.1 ± 16.1; P < 0.001). Right side (73.9%) and indirect type (91.3%) in group A were more prevalent than in group B (51.5% and 69.4%, respectively) with statistic significance (P = 0.020 and P = 0.023). The rate of laparoscopic surgery in group B (n = 862, 91.7%) was higher than in group A (n = 14, 64.3%, P < 0.001). In comparing perioperative variables between the two groups, operative time (49.4 ± 23.5 minutes) and hospital stay (1.9 ± 0.7 days) in group A were longer than in group B (38.9 ± 16.9, 1.1 ± 0.2; P = 0.046 and P < 0.001, respectively) and pain score at 7 days in group A was higher than in group B (3.1 ± 0.7 vs. 2.3 ± 1.0, P < 0.001). Postoperative recurrence rate was not significantly different between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inguinal hernia following radical retropubic surgery for prostate cancer was predominantly right side and indirect type with statistic significance compared to hernias without previous radical prostatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.4.175","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.4.175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of inguinal hernia developed after radical retropubic surgery for prostate cancer to the hernia without previous radical prostatectomy.

Methods: Twenty-three patients (group A) who had radical retropubic surgery for prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic or open tension-free inguinal hernia repair from March 2007 to February 2011. Nine hundred and forty patients (group B) without previous radical retropubic surgery received laparoscopic or tension-free open hernia operation.

Results: Group A was older than group B (mean ± standard deviation, 69.6 ± 7.2 vs. 54.1 ± 16.1; P < 0.001). Right side (73.9%) and indirect type (91.3%) in group A were more prevalent than in group B (51.5% and 69.4%, respectively) with statistic significance (P = 0.020 and P = 0.023). The rate of laparoscopic surgery in group B (n = 862, 91.7%) was higher than in group A (n = 14, 64.3%, P < 0.001). In comparing perioperative variables between the two groups, operative time (49.4 ± 23.5 minutes) and hospital stay (1.9 ± 0.7 days) in group A were longer than in group B (38.9 ± 16.9, 1.1 ± 0.2; P = 0.046 and P < 0.001, respectively) and pain score at 7 days in group A was higher than in group B (3.1 ± 0.7 vs. 2.3 ± 1.0, P < 0.001). Postoperative recurrence rate was not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusion: Inguinal hernia following radical retropubic surgery for prostate cancer was predominantly right side and indirect type with statistic significance compared to hernias without previous radical prostatectomy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹股沟疝是前列腺癌根治性耻骨后手术后发生的。
目的:在本回顾性研究中,我们旨在比较前列腺癌根治性耻骨后手术后发生的腹股沟疝与未行根治性前列腺切除术的腹股沟疝的临床特征。方法:2007年3月至2011年2月,23例根治性耻骨后前列腺癌患者行腹腔镜或开放式无张力腹股沟疝修补术(A组)。B组940例既往无根治性耻骨后手术的患者接受腹腔镜或无张力开放性疝手术。结果:A组年龄大于B组(平均±标准差,69.6±7.2∶54.1±16.1;P < 0.001)。A组右侧型(73.9%)、间接型(91.3%)高于B组(分别为51.5%、69.4%),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.020、P = 0.023)。B组腹腔镜手术率(n = 862, 91.7%)高于A组(n = 14, 64.3%, P < 0.001)。两组围手术期变量比较,A组手术时间(49.4±23.5 min)、住院时间(1.9±0.7 d)较B组(38.9±16.9,1.1±0.2)长;P = 0.046, P < 0.001), 7 d疼痛评分A组高于B组(3.1±0.7比2.3±1.0,P < 0.001)。两组术后复发率差异无统计学意义。结论:前列腺癌根治性耻骨后手术后腹股沟疝以右侧疝和间接疝为主,与未行根治性前列腺切除术的腹股沟疝相比,差异有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Matrix Metalloproteinase 41 : inside the presidency of George H.W. Bush Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in mucosal gastric cancer and re-evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection The optimal follow-up period in patients with above 5-year disease-free survival after curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1