Effect of estimated prostate volume on silodosin-mediated improvements in the signs and symptoms of BPH: does prostate size matter?

Open Access Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2011-06-08 eCollection Date: 2011-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJU.S18941
Steven A Kaplan, Claus G Roehrborn, Lawrence A Hill, Weining Volinn
{"title":"Effect of estimated prostate volume on silodosin-mediated improvements in the signs and symptoms of BPH: does prostate size matter?","authors":"Steven A Kaplan,&nbsp;Claus G Roehrborn,&nbsp;Lawrence A Hill,&nbsp;Weining Volinn","doi":"10.2147/OAJU.S18941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The uroselective α-blocker silodosin significantly improved International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in two 12-week, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled Phase III studies in men aged ≥ 50 years with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and maintained symptom improvement during a 9-month open-label (OL) extension. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effects of estimated prostate volume (EPV) on silodosin-mediated symptom improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were stratified by EPV (<30 mL or ≥ 30 mL) calculated from prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations using a published algorithm. Group comparisons were done by analysis of covariance with last observations carried forward.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 890 patients with PSA baseline data, 192 had EPV < 30 mL and 698 had EPV ≥ 30 mL. During DB treatment, silodosin was associated with significant symptom improvement (adjusted mean difference versus placebo) in men with EPV < 30 mL (-2.0; P = 0.038) and those with EPV ≥ 30 mL (-3.0; P < 0.0001). Among patients who received silodosin during DB treatment, changes from baseline in IPSS to the end of OL extension (mean ± standard deviation) were similar for EPV < 30 mL (n = 60, -7.0 ± 6.8) and EPV ≥ 30 mL (n = 242, -8.0 ± 7.1; P = 0.416). Also, among patients who received placebo as DB treatment, symptom improvement at the end of OL extension was similar for EPV < 30 mL (n = 62, -6.2 ± 8.1) and EPV ≥ 30 mL (n = 275, -6.7 ± 6.1; P = 0.339).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Silodosin effectively relieved BPH-related symptoms for up to 12 months, irrespective of prostate size, including in patients with enlarged prostates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19572,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Urology","volume":"3 ","pages":"89-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJU.S18941","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJU.S18941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: The uroselective α-blocker silodosin significantly improved International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in two 12-week, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled Phase III studies in men aged ≥ 50 years with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and maintained symptom improvement during a 9-month open-label (OL) extension. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effects of estimated prostate volume (EPV) on silodosin-mediated symptom improvement.

Methods: Patients were stratified by EPV (<30 mL or ≥ 30 mL) calculated from prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations using a published algorithm. Group comparisons were done by analysis of covariance with last observations carried forward.

Results: Of 890 patients with PSA baseline data, 192 had EPV < 30 mL and 698 had EPV ≥ 30 mL. During DB treatment, silodosin was associated with significant symptom improvement (adjusted mean difference versus placebo) in men with EPV < 30 mL (-2.0; P = 0.038) and those with EPV ≥ 30 mL (-3.0; P < 0.0001). Among patients who received silodosin during DB treatment, changes from baseline in IPSS to the end of OL extension (mean ± standard deviation) were similar for EPV < 30 mL (n = 60, -7.0 ± 6.8) and EPV ≥ 30 mL (n = 242, -8.0 ± 7.1; P = 0.416). Also, among patients who received placebo as DB treatment, symptom improvement at the end of OL extension was similar for EPV < 30 mL (n = 62, -6.2 ± 8.1) and EPV ≥ 30 mL (n = 275, -6.7 ± 6.1; P = 0.339).

Conclusion: Silodosin effectively relieved BPH-related symptoms for up to 12 months, irrespective of prostate size, including in patients with enlarged prostates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计前列腺体积对西洛多辛介导的BPH体征和症状改善的影响:前列腺大小重要吗?
目的:尿选择性α-阻滞剂西洛多辛(silodosin)在两项为期12周、双盲(DB)、安慰剂对照的III期研究中显著改善了国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS),这些研究对象为年龄≥50岁、有良性前列腺增生(BPH)症状的男性,并在9个月的开放标签(OL)延长期中维持了症状改善。这项事后分析评估了前列腺体积(EPV)对西洛多辛介导的症状改善的影响。方法:根据EPV对患者进行分层(结果:在890例有PSA基线数据的患者中,192例EPV < 30 mL, 698例EPV≥30 mL。在DB治疗期间,西洛多辛与EPV < 30 mL (-2.0;P = 0.038), EPV≥30 mL (-3.0;P < 0.0001)。在DB治疗期间接受西洛多辛治疗的患者中,EPV < 30 mL (n = 60, -7.0±6.8)和EPV≥30 mL (n = 242, -8.0±7.1;P = 0.416)。此外,在接受安慰剂作为DB治疗的患者中,EPV < 30 mL (n = 62, -6.2±8.1)和EPV≥30 mL (n = 275, -6.7±6.1;P = 0.339)。结论:西洛多辛可有效缓解前列腺肥大相关症状长达12个月,与前列腺大小无关,包括前列腺肥大患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of biochemical markers in testicular cancer: diagnosis, staging, and surveillance. Effect of baseline symptom severity on continence improvement mediated by oxybutynin chloride topical gel. Intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam plus fluoroquinolone prophylaxis prior to prostate ultrasound biopsy reduces serious infectious complications and is cost effective. Abnormality of pituitary gonadal axis among Nigerian males with infertility: study of patterns and possible etiologic interrelationships. Effect of weight loss on urinary incontinence in women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1