Effect of silodosin on specific urinary symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: analysis of international prostate symptom scores in 2 phase III clinical studies.

Open Access Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2010-12-22 eCollection Date: 2010-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJU.S15333
Marc C Gittelman, Leonard S Marks, Lawrence A Hill, Weining Volinn, Gary Hoel
{"title":"Effect of silodosin on specific urinary symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: analysis of international prostate symptom scores in 2 phase III clinical studies.","authors":"Marc C Gittelman,&nbsp;Leonard S Marks,&nbsp;Lawrence A Hill,&nbsp;Weining Volinn,&nbsp;Gary Hoel","doi":"10.2147/OAJU.S15333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pooled results from 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, US phase III studies (NCT00224107, NCT00224120) showed that silodosin, a uroselective α-blocker, significantly improved International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This analysis evaluated the effect of silodosin on each symptom assessed by IPSS questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Study participants (N = 923) were men aged ≥50 years with IPSS ≥13 and Qmax 4-15 mL/s. They received silodosin 8 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Patient responses to 7 IPSS questions were collected at weeks 0 (baseline), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 12 and scored on a 6-point scale. Efficacy of silodosin versus placebo was assessed by analysis of covariance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For each symptom, the 2 treatment groups had similar mean baseline scores. Decrease in score from baseline (mean ± standard deviation) to last observation was significantly greater with silodosin than with placebo for all symptoms (P < 0.005); symptom improvement with silodosin (versus placebo) was greatest for weak stream (silodosin, -1.1 ± 1.4 versus placebo, -0.5 ± 1.2; P < 0.0001) and smallest for nocturia (silodosin, -0.6 ± 1.1 versus placebo, -0.4 ± 1.2; P = 0.0037). Compared with placebo, silodosin significantly improved nocturia within 1 week (silodosin, -0.5 ± 1.07 versus placebo, -0.3 ± 1.05; P = 0.009) and all other symptoms within 3 to 4 days (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Silodosin significantly improved all BPH-associated symptoms assessed by IPSS questionnaire within the first week of treatment. All improvements were maintained over the 12-week study period.</p>","PeriodicalId":19572,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Urology","volume":"3 ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJU.S15333","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJU.S15333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: Pooled results from 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, US phase III studies (NCT00224107, NCT00224120) showed that silodosin, a uroselective α-blocker, significantly improved International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This analysis evaluated the effect of silodosin on each symptom assessed by IPSS questionnaire.

Materials and methods: Study participants (N = 923) were men aged ≥50 years with IPSS ≥13 and Qmax 4-15 mL/s. They received silodosin 8 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Patient responses to 7 IPSS questions were collected at weeks 0 (baseline), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 12 and scored on a 6-point scale. Efficacy of silodosin versus placebo was assessed by analysis of covariance.

Results: For each symptom, the 2 treatment groups had similar mean baseline scores. Decrease in score from baseline (mean ± standard deviation) to last observation was significantly greater with silodosin than with placebo for all symptoms (P < 0.005); symptom improvement with silodosin (versus placebo) was greatest for weak stream (silodosin, -1.1 ± 1.4 versus placebo, -0.5 ± 1.2; P < 0.0001) and smallest for nocturia (silodosin, -0.6 ± 1.1 versus placebo, -0.4 ± 1.2; P = 0.0037). Compared with placebo, silodosin significantly improved nocturia within 1 week (silodosin, -0.5 ± 1.07 versus placebo, -0.3 ± 1.05; P = 0.009) and all other symptoms within 3 to 4 days (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Silodosin significantly improved all BPH-associated symptoms assessed by IPSS questionnaire within the first week of treatment. All improvements were maintained over the 12-week study period.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西洛多辛对良性前列腺增生相关泌尿系统症状的影响:两项国际III期临床研究前列腺症状评分分析
目的:两项随机、安慰剂对照、美国III期研究(NCT00224107、NCT00224120)的综合结果显示,尿选择性α-阻滞剂西洛多辛可显著改善有症状的良性前列腺增生(BPH)男性的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)。本分析评估西洛多辛对IPSS问卷评估的各症状的影响。材料与方法:研究对象(N = 923)为年龄≥50岁、IPSS≥13、Qmax 4 ~ 15ml /s的男性。他们服用西洛多辛8毫克或安慰剂,每天一次,持续12周。在第0周(基线)、第0.5周、第1周、第2周、第4周和第12周收集患者对7个IPSS问题的回答,并按6分制评分。西洛多辛与安慰剂的疗效通过协方差分析进行评估。结果:两组患者各症状的平均基线评分相近。西洛多辛组从基线(平均值±标准差)到最后一次观察的评分下降幅度均显著大于安慰剂组(P < 0.005);西洛多辛(与安慰剂相比)对弱流的症状改善最大(西洛多辛,-1.1±1.4 vs安慰剂,-0.5±1.2;P < 0.0001),夜尿症最小(西洛多辛,-0.6±1.1 vs安慰剂,-0.4±1.2;P = 0.0037)。与安慰剂相比,西洛多辛在1周内显著改善夜尿症(西洛多辛,-0.5±1.07 vs安慰剂,-0.3±1.05;P = 0.009),并在3 ~ 4天内出现所有其他症状(P < 0.01)。结论:西洛多辛在治疗的第一周内显著改善了IPSS问卷评估的所有bph相关症状。在12周的研究期间,所有的改善都保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of biochemical markers in testicular cancer: diagnosis, staging, and surveillance. Effect of baseline symptom severity on continence improvement mediated by oxybutynin chloride topical gel. Intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam plus fluoroquinolone prophylaxis prior to prostate ultrasound biopsy reduces serious infectious complications and is cost effective. Abnormality of pituitary gonadal axis among Nigerian males with infertility: study of patterns and possible etiologic interrelationships. Effect of weight loss on urinary incontinence in women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1