Mesiodistal tooth dimensions and anterior and overall Bolton ratios evaluated by cone beam computed tomography.

Q Medicine Australian Orthodontic Journal Pub Date : 2013-11-01
Mevlut Celikoglu, Metin Nur, Dogan Kilkis, Omer Said Sezgin, Mehmet Bayram
{"title":"Mesiodistal tooth dimensions and anterior and overall Bolton ratios evaluated by cone beam computed tomography.","authors":"Mevlut Celikoglu,&nbsp;Metin Nur,&nbsp;Dogan Kilkis,&nbsp;Omer Said Sezgin,&nbsp;Mehmet Bayram","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The mesiodistal widths of the maxillary and mandibular teeth and anterior and overall tooth size ratios were measured by CBCT and conventional orthodontic plaster methods, compared, and correlation coefficients for both methods determined.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The records of 26 patients (14 males and 12 females) between the ages of 18 and 28 years were randomly selected from the archives of the Oral Diagnosis, Radiology and Orthodontic Departments at the Karadeniz Technical University. The mesiodistal diameters of the maxillary and mandibular permanent teeth from first molar to first molar were measured on the patient's plaster models and also on CBCT arch renditions. Anterior and overall Bolton ratios were calculated for each method. Comparisons were performed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measurements of the mesiodistal widths of most maxillary and mandibular teeth were similar and consistent between the conventional and CBCT methods. PCC values ranged from 0.637 (mandibular right second premolar) to 0.916 (maxillary right canine). PCC values for anterior and overall ratios were 0.756 and 0.781, respectively, indicating that correlations between conventional and CBCT methods were acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dental measurements and anterior and overall Bolton ratios calculated on CBCT showed acceptable PCC values indicating that CBCT measurements could be used instead of those obtained from conventional plaster models.</p>","PeriodicalId":55417,"journal":{"name":"Australian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"29 2","pages":"153-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The mesiodistal widths of the maxillary and mandibular teeth and anterior and overall tooth size ratios were measured by CBCT and conventional orthodontic plaster methods, compared, and correlation coefficients for both methods determined.

Material and methods: The records of 26 patients (14 males and 12 females) between the ages of 18 and 28 years were randomly selected from the archives of the Oral Diagnosis, Radiology and Orthodontic Departments at the Karadeniz Technical University. The mesiodistal diameters of the maxillary and mandibular permanent teeth from first molar to first molar were measured on the patient's plaster models and also on CBCT arch renditions. Anterior and overall Bolton ratios were calculated for each method. Comparisons were performed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC).

Results: The measurements of the mesiodistal widths of most maxillary and mandibular teeth were similar and consistent between the conventional and CBCT methods. PCC values ranged from 0.637 (mandibular right second premolar) to 0.916 (maxillary right canine). PCC values for anterior and overall ratios were 0.756 and 0.781, respectively, indicating that correlations between conventional and CBCT methods were acceptable.

Conclusion: Dental measurements and anterior and overall Bolton ratios calculated on CBCT showed acceptable PCC values indicating that CBCT measurements could be used instead of those obtained from conventional plaster models.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锥形束计算机断层扫描评估中远端牙齿尺寸和前、总博尔顿比。
目的:采用CBCT和常规正畸石膏法测量上颌牙中远端宽度、前牙和总牙尺寸比值,并进行比较,确定两种方法的相关系数。材料与方法:随机选取卡拉德尼兹工业大学口腔诊断科、放射科和正畸科档案中年龄18 ~ 28岁的26例患者(男14例,女12例)。在患者的石膏模型上测量上颌和下颌恒牙从第一磨牙到第一磨牙的中远端直径,并在CBCT弓表现上测量。计算每种方法的前路和总博尔顿比率。采用Pearson相关系数(PCC)进行比较。结果:常规方法与CBCT方法测量的大多数上颌牙近远端宽度相似且一致。PCC值为0.637(下颌骨右侧第二前磨牙)至0.916(上颌右侧犬齿)。前路和整体比值的PCC值分别为0.756和0.781,表明常规方法和CBCT方法之间的相关性是可以接受的。结论:CBCT计算出的牙齿测量值、前牙和整体博尔顿比显示出可接受的PCC值,表明CBCT测量值可以代替传统的石膏模型测量值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Orthodontic Journal
Australian Orthodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.48
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Minimizing publication bias. Looking backwards into the Future of Orthodontics. Orthodontic Education. Australian Orthodontists: are they "with it". The role of the foundation in Australian Orthodontic education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1