Bi-objective optimization of post-combustion CO2 capture using methyldiethanolamine

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103815
Nobuo Hara, Satoshi Taniguchi, Takehiro Yamaki, Thuy T.H. Nguyen, Sho Kataoka
{"title":"Bi-objective optimization of post-combustion CO2 capture using methyldiethanolamine","authors":"Nobuo Hara,&nbsp;Satoshi Taniguchi,&nbsp;Takehiro Yamaki,&nbsp;Thuy T.H. Nguyen,&nbsp;Sho Kataoka","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Process simulation and analyzes based on multiple evaluation indexes are crucial for accelerating the practical use of the post-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture process. This study presents a bi-objective optimization of the post-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> absorption process using methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) via machine-learning and genetic algorithm to evaluate CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the absorption process using life cycle assessment and cost from operating and capital expenditures. An initial dataset was generated by changing eight design variables, and machine-learning models were built using random forest classifier and Gaussian process regression. Pareto solutions were predicted using a genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) with the constraints of purity, recovery, and temperature, and were verified via process simulation. Verified data were added to the dataset, and model building, prediction, and verification were repeated. Eventually, 56 Pareto solutions were obtained after 11 iterations. In the final Pareto solutions, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions increased from 0.56 to 0.6 t-CO<sub>2</sub>/t-CO<sub>2</sub> with a decrease in cost from 74 to 66 USD/t-CO<sub>2</sub>. The trends and composition of each objective variable were examined, and the optimal structure of the equipment and operation conditions was clarified. The approach of bi-objective optimization in this study is promising for evaluating the CO<sub>2</sub> capture process and individual processes of carbon capture, utilization, and storage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103815"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175058362200233X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Process simulation and analyzes based on multiple evaluation indexes are crucial for accelerating the practical use of the post-combustion CO2 capture process. This study presents a bi-objective optimization of the post-combustion CO2 absorption process using methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) via machine-learning and genetic algorithm to evaluate CO2 emissions from the absorption process using life cycle assessment and cost from operating and capital expenditures. An initial dataset was generated by changing eight design variables, and machine-learning models were built using random forest classifier and Gaussian process regression. Pareto solutions were predicted using a genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) with the constraints of purity, recovery, and temperature, and were verified via process simulation. Verified data were added to the dataset, and model building, prediction, and verification were repeated. Eventually, 56 Pareto solutions were obtained after 11 iterations. In the final Pareto solutions, CO2 emissions increased from 0.56 to 0.6 t-CO2/t-CO2 with a decrease in cost from 74 to 66 USD/t-CO2. The trends and composition of each objective variable were examined, and the optimal structure of the equipment and operation conditions was clarified. The approach of bi-objective optimization in this study is promising for evaluating the CO2 capture process and individual processes of carbon capture, utilization, and storage.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲基二乙醇胺捕集燃烧后二氧化碳的双目标优化
基于多评价指标的过程模拟与分析对于加快燃烧后CO2捕集过程的实用化至关重要。本研究提出了利用甲基二乙醇胺(MDEA)对燃烧后二氧化碳吸收过程进行双目标优化,通过机器学习和遗传算法,利用生命周期评估和运营成本和资本支出评估吸收过程中的二氧化碳排放量。通过改变8个设计变量生成初始数据集,并使用随机森林分类器和高斯过程回归建立机器学习模型。利用遗传算法(NSGA-II)在纯度、回收率和温度约束下预测了Pareto解,并通过过程模拟进行了验证。将验证的数据添加到数据集中,并重复模型构建、预测和验证。经过11次迭代,最终得到56个Pareto解。在最终的帕累托方案中,CO2排放量从0.56 t-CO2/t-CO2增加到0.6 t-CO2,成本从74美元/t-CO2下降到66美元/t-CO2。考察了各目标变量的变化趋势和组成,明确了设备的最佳结构和运行条件。本研究的双目标优化方法有望用于评估CO2捕集过程和碳捕集、利用和封存的单个过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
期刊最新文献
Putting the genie back in the bottle: Decarbonizing petroleum with direct air capture and enhanced oil recovery A conceptual evaluation of the use of Ca(OH)2 for attaining carbon capture rates of 99% in the calcium looping process Determining the dominant factors controlling mineralization in three-dimensional fracture networks Conceptual design and evaluation of membrane gas separation-based CO2 recovery unit for CO2 electrolyzers employing anion exchange membranes Enhanced cation release via acid pretreatment for gigaton-scale geologic CO2 sequestration in basalt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1