Hello, Who is Calling?: Can Words Reveal the Social Nature of Conversations?

Anthony Stark, Izhak Shafran, Jeffrey Kaye
{"title":"Hello, Who is Calling?: Can Words Reveal the Social Nature of Conversations?","authors":"Anthony Stark,&nbsp;Izhak Shafran,&nbsp;Jeffrey Kaye","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to infer the social nature of conversations from their content automatically. To place this work in context, our motivation stems from the need to understand how social disengagement affects cognitive decline or depression among older adults. For this purpose, we collected a comprehensive and naturalistic corpus comprising of all the incoming and outgoing telephone calls from 10 subjects over the duration of a year. As a first step, we learned a binary classifier to filter out business related conversation, achieving an accuracy of about 85%. This classification task provides a convenient tool to probe the nature of telephone conversations. We evaluated the utility of openings and closing in differentiating personal calls, and find that empirical results on a large corpus do not support the hypotheses by Schegloff and Sacks that personal conversations are marked by unique closing structures. For classifying different types of social relationships such as family vs other, we investigated features related to language use (entropy), hand-crafted dictionary (LIWC) and topics learned using unsupervised latent Dirichlet models (LDA). Our results show that the posteriors over topics from LDA provide consistently higher accuracy (60-81%) compared to LIWC or language use features in distinguishing different types of conversations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74542,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. North American Chapter. Meeting","volume":" ","pages":"112-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3886719/pdf/nihms399627.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. North American Chapter. Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to infer the social nature of conversations from their content automatically. To place this work in context, our motivation stems from the need to understand how social disengagement affects cognitive decline or depression among older adults. For this purpose, we collected a comprehensive and naturalistic corpus comprising of all the incoming and outgoing telephone calls from 10 subjects over the duration of a year. As a first step, we learned a binary classifier to filter out business related conversation, achieving an accuracy of about 85%. This classification task provides a convenient tool to probe the nature of telephone conversations. We evaluated the utility of openings and closing in differentiating personal calls, and find that empirical results on a large corpus do not support the hypotheses by Schegloff and Sacks that personal conversations are marked by unique closing structures. For classifying different types of social relationships such as family vs other, we investigated features related to language use (entropy), hand-crafted dictionary (LIWC) and topics learned using unsupervised latent Dirichlet models (LDA). Our results show that the posteriors over topics from LDA provide consistently higher accuracy (60-81%) compared to LIWC or language use features in distinguishing different types of conversations.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喂,你是哪位?:语言能揭示对话的社会性吗?
本研究旨在从对话内容中自动推断对话的社会性质。把这项工作放在背景中,我们的动机源于需要了解社会脱离如何影响老年人的认知能力下降或抑郁。为此,我们收集了一个全面而自然的语料库,包括10名受试者在一年中所有的来电和来电。作为第一步,我们学习了一个二元分类器来过滤掉与业务相关的对话,达到了大约85%的准确率。这个分类任务提供了一个方便的工具来探测电话交谈的性质。我们评估了开始和结束在区分个人呼叫中的效用,并发现大型语料库的实证结果不支持Schegloff和Sacks的假设,即个人对话以独特的结束结构为特征。为了对不同类型的社会关系(如家庭与他人)进行分类,我们研究了与语言使用(熵)、手工制作字典(LIWC)和使用无监督潜在狄利克雷模型(LDA)学习的主题相关的特征。我们的研究结果表明,与LIWC或语言使用特征相比,LDA的主题后置在区分不同类型的对话方面始终提供更高的准确性(60-81%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ODD: A Benchmark Dataset for the Natural Language Processing Based Opioid Related Aberrant Behavior Detection. Towards Reducing Diagnostic Errors with Interpretable Risk Prediction. ScAN: Suicide Attempt and Ideation Events Dataset. ScAN: Suicide Attempt and Ideation Events Dataset Translational NLP: A New Paradigm and General Principles for Natural Language Processing Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1