Hospital bioterrorism planning and burn surge.

Randy D Kearns, Brent Myers, Charles B Cairns, Preston B Rich, C Scott Hultman, Anthony G Charles, Samuel W Jones, Grace L Schmits, Mary Beth Skarote, James H Holmes, Bruce A Cairns
{"title":"Hospital bioterrorism planning and burn surge.","authors":"Randy D Kearns,&nbsp;Brent Myers,&nbsp;Charles B Cairns,&nbsp;Preston B Rich,&nbsp;C Scott Hultman,&nbsp;Anthony G Charles,&nbsp;Samuel W Jones,&nbsp;Grace L Schmits,&nbsp;Mary Beth Skarote,&nbsp;James H Holmes,&nbsp;Bruce A Cairns","doi":"10.1089/bsp.2013.0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On the morning of June 9, 2009, an explosion occurred at a manufacturing plant in Garner, North Carolina. By the end of the day, 68 injured patients had been evaluated at the 3 Level I trauma centers and 3 community hospitals in the Raleigh/Durham metro area (3 people who were buried in the structural collapse died at the scene). Approximately 300 employees were present at the time of the explosion, when natural gas being vented during the repair of a hot water heater ignited. The concussion from the explosion led to structural failure in multiple locations and breached additional natural gas, electrical, and ammonia lines that ran overhead in the 1-story concrete industrial plant. Intent is the major difference between this type of accident and a terrorist using an incendiary device to terrorize a targeted population. But while this disaster lacked intent, the response, rescue, and outcomes were improved as a result of bioterrorism preparedness. This article discusses how bioterrorism hospital preparedness planning, with an all-hazards approach, became the basis for coordinated burn surge disaster preparedness. This real-world disaster challenged a variety of systems, hospitals, and healthcare providers to work efficiently and effectively to manage multiple survivors. Burn-injured patients served as a focus for this work. We describe the response, rescue, and resuscitation provided by first responders and first receivers as well as efforts made to develop burn care capabilities and surge capacity. </p>","PeriodicalId":87059,"journal":{"name":"Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science","volume":"12 1","pages":"20-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/bsp.2013.0065","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2013.0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

On the morning of June 9, 2009, an explosion occurred at a manufacturing plant in Garner, North Carolina. By the end of the day, 68 injured patients had been evaluated at the 3 Level I trauma centers and 3 community hospitals in the Raleigh/Durham metro area (3 people who were buried in the structural collapse died at the scene). Approximately 300 employees were present at the time of the explosion, when natural gas being vented during the repair of a hot water heater ignited. The concussion from the explosion led to structural failure in multiple locations and breached additional natural gas, electrical, and ammonia lines that ran overhead in the 1-story concrete industrial plant. Intent is the major difference between this type of accident and a terrorist using an incendiary device to terrorize a targeted population. But while this disaster lacked intent, the response, rescue, and outcomes were improved as a result of bioterrorism preparedness. This article discusses how bioterrorism hospital preparedness planning, with an all-hazards approach, became the basis for coordinated burn surge disaster preparedness. This real-world disaster challenged a variety of systems, hospitals, and healthcare providers to work efficiently and effectively to manage multiple survivors. Burn-injured patients served as a focus for this work. We describe the response, rescue, and resuscitation provided by first responders and first receivers as well as efforts made to develop burn care capabilities and surge capacity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院生物恐怖袭击计划和烧伤激增。
2009年6月9日上午,北卡罗来纳州加纳的一家制造工厂发生爆炸。到当天结束时,在罗利/达勒姆都市区的3个一级创伤中心和3个社区医院对68名受伤患者进行了评估(3名被埋在结构倒塌中的人当场死亡)。爆炸发生时,大约有300名员工在场,当时他们正在维修热水器,正在排放的天然气起火。爆炸造成的震荡导致多个地方的结构损坏,并破坏了位于1层混凝土工业厂房上方的额外天然气、电力和氨管道。这种类型的事故与恐怖分子使用燃烧装置恐吓目标人群之间的主要区别在于意图。但是,虽然这次灾难缺乏意图,但由于生物恐怖主义的准备工作,反应、救援和结果都得到了改善。本文讨论了采用全危害方法的生物恐怖主义医院准备计划如何成为协调烧伤激增灾害准备的基础。这场现实世界的灾难对各种系统、医院和医疗保健提供者提出了挑战,要求他们高效地工作,有效地管理多名幸存者。烧伤患者是本研究的重点对象。我们描述了第一响应者和第一接受者提供的反应、救援和复苏,以及为发展烧伤护理能力和激增能力所做的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal Aspects of Biosecurity Response at the State and Local Level Biosecurity Programs and Assets Future Directions for Biosecurity Seeds of Destruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1