Peri-implantitis diagnosis and treatment by New Zealand periodontists and oral maxillofacial surgeons.

The New Zealand dental journal Pub Date : 2014-03-01
Assil A Russell, Andrew Tawse-Smith, Jonathan M Broadbent, Jonathan W Leichter
{"title":"Peri-implantitis diagnosis and treatment by New Zealand periodontists and oral maxillofacial surgeons.","authors":"Assil A Russell,&nbsp;Andrew Tawse-Smith,&nbsp;Jonathan M Broadbent,&nbsp;Jonathan W Leichter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the understanding, diagnosis and management of peri-implantitis by New Zealand periodontists and oral maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Telephone interviews (in combination with a postal and electronic survey) were conducted of all 25 periodontists and 32 OMFS listed as specialists on the New Zealand Dental Register. A seven item multi-choice and short answer questionnaire was used to investigate: their definition of peri-implantitis; the number of annual referrals received in their practice for this condition; their diagnostic, preventive and treatment strategies for peri-implantitis; and their perception of the role of general dental practitioners in its management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participation rate was 84.6%. Most respondents defined peri-implantitis as a disease of multifactorial aetiology that leads to destruction of the bone supporting an implant. The average number of cases seen annually differed between periodontists (11 cases/year) and OMFS (4 cases/year). The criteria used by the respondents to diagnose peri-implantitis included increased probing depths and radiographic evidence of bone loss. Each type of specialist used mechanical debridement for treatment, but a higher proportion of OMFS performed surgical procedures as treatment. The prevention strategies used smoking cessation advice and ensuring good plaque control. All respondents agreed that peri-implantitis is an important disease that can lead to implant failure, and all acknowledged the role of general dental practitioners in diagnosis, referral for treatment and long-term implant maintenance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The definition, diagnostic criteria and management strategies used by New Zealand specialists are generally consistent with those found in the literature. No evidence-based, gold standard treatment protocol for peri-implantitis has been identified in the literature, and New Zealand specialists use a range of treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":76703,"journal":{"name":"The New Zealand dental journal","volume":"110 1","pages":"6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Zealand dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the understanding, diagnosis and management of peri-implantitis by New Zealand periodontists and oral maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS).

Design: Telephone interviews (in combination with a postal and electronic survey) were conducted of all 25 periodontists and 32 OMFS listed as specialists on the New Zealand Dental Register. A seven item multi-choice and short answer questionnaire was used to investigate: their definition of peri-implantitis; the number of annual referrals received in their practice for this condition; their diagnostic, preventive and treatment strategies for peri-implantitis; and their perception of the role of general dental practitioners in its management.

Results: The participation rate was 84.6%. Most respondents defined peri-implantitis as a disease of multifactorial aetiology that leads to destruction of the bone supporting an implant. The average number of cases seen annually differed between periodontists (11 cases/year) and OMFS (4 cases/year). The criteria used by the respondents to diagnose peri-implantitis included increased probing depths and radiographic evidence of bone loss. Each type of specialist used mechanical debridement for treatment, but a higher proportion of OMFS performed surgical procedures as treatment. The prevention strategies used smoking cessation advice and ensuring good plaque control. All respondents agreed that peri-implantitis is an important disease that can lead to implant failure, and all acknowledged the role of general dental practitioners in diagnosis, referral for treatment and long-term implant maintenance.

Conclusion: The definition, diagnostic criteria and management strategies used by New Zealand specialists are generally consistent with those found in the literature. No evidence-based, gold standard treatment protocol for peri-implantitis has been identified in the literature, and New Zealand specialists use a range of treatment modalities.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰牙周病专家和口腔颌面外科医生对种植周炎的诊断和治疗。
目的:探讨新西兰牙周病医师和口腔颌面外科医生(OMFS)对种植周炎的认识、诊断和处理。设计:电话访谈(结合邮政和电子调查)对新西兰牙科登记处列出的所有25名牙周病专家和32名OMFS进行。采用7项多选题简答问卷调查:对种植体周围炎的定义;在他们的实践中每年收到的这种情况的转介数量;种植体周围炎的诊断、预防和治疗策略;以及他们对普通牙科医生在其管理中的作用的看法。结果:参评率为84.6%。大多数应答者将种植体周围炎定义为一种多因素病因导致支撑种植体的骨破坏的疾病。每年平均病例数在牙周病专家(11例/年)和OMFS(4例/年)之间存在差异。应答者用于诊断种植体周围炎的标准包括增加探探深度和骨质流失的影像学证据。各类专科医生均采用机械清创进行治疗,但较高比例的OMFS采用外科手术治疗。预防策略包括戒烟建议和确保良好的斑块控制。所有受访者都认为种植体周围炎是一种可导致种植体失败的重要疾病,并且都承认全科牙科医生在诊断、转诊治疗和长期种植体维护方面的作用。结论:新西兰专家使用的定义、诊断标准和管理策略与文献中发现的基本一致。文献中没有证据证明的种植体周围炎的金标准治疗方案,新西兰专家使用一系列治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smoking Prevention Research Design Steroid Prophylaxis: The knowledge and practices of New Zealand General Dental Practitioners. An Investigation of the Views of Parents in Otago on Dental Care for Primary School-Aged Children by the Community Oral Health Service Prior to the Introduction of the Hub-Based Clinic System. Final year dental students in New Zealand: Self-reported confidence levels prior to BDS graduation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1