How experts gain influence.

IF 9.1 4区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Harvard business review Pub Date : 2013-07-01
Anette Mikes, Matthew Hall, Yuval Millo
{"title":"How experts gain influence.","authors":"Anette Mikes,&nbsp;Matthew Hall,&nbsp;Yuval Millo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In theory, the risk management groups of two British banks--Saxon and Anglo--had the same influence in their organizations. But in practice, they did not: Saxon's was engaged in critical work throughout the bank, while Anglo's had little visibility outside its areas of expertise. In their study of these two financial institutions, the authors identified four competencies--trailblazing, toolmaking, teamwork, and translation--that help functional leaders or groups compete for top management's limited attention and increase their impact. Anglo's risk managers were strong in only some of the competencies, but Saxon's were strong in all four. They consistently scanned the internal and external environment for important issues to which they could apply a risk management perspective (trailblazing) and then developed tools--such as quarterly risk reports--that spread their expertise (toolmaking). While controlling the tools' design and implementation, the risk managers incorporated business managers' insights (teamwork) and made sure everyone could understand the findings (translation). Ultimately, experts' roles must fit the organization's strategy and structural needs. In some situations, functional experts can raise their profile by cultivating just two of the competencies. But those who are strong in all four are likely to be the most influential.</p>","PeriodicalId":12874,"journal":{"name":"Harvard business review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard business review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In theory, the risk management groups of two British banks--Saxon and Anglo--had the same influence in their organizations. But in practice, they did not: Saxon's was engaged in critical work throughout the bank, while Anglo's had little visibility outside its areas of expertise. In their study of these two financial institutions, the authors identified four competencies--trailblazing, toolmaking, teamwork, and translation--that help functional leaders or groups compete for top management's limited attention and increase their impact. Anglo's risk managers were strong in only some of the competencies, but Saxon's were strong in all four. They consistently scanned the internal and external environment for important issues to which they could apply a risk management perspective (trailblazing) and then developed tools--such as quarterly risk reports--that spread their expertise (toolmaking). While controlling the tools' design and implementation, the risk managers incorporated business managers' insights (teamwork) and made sure everyone could understand the findings (translation). Ultimately, experts' roles must fit the organization's strategy and structural needs. In some situations, functional experts can raise their profile by cultivating just two of the competencies. But those who are strong in all four are likely to be the most influential.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专家如何获得影响力。
理论上,两家英国银行——撒克逊银行(Saxon)和盎格鲁银行(Anglo)——的风险管理部门在其组织中具有相同的影响力。但在实践中,他们并没有这样做:撒克逊的员工在整个银行从事关键工作,而盎格鲁的员工在其专业领域之外几乎没有知名度。在他们对这两家金融机构的研究中,作者确定了四种能力——开拓、工具制造、团队合作和翻译——这些能力可以帮助职能领导或团队争夺最高管理层有限的注意力,并增加他们的影响力。盎格鲁的风险经理只在某些能力上表现出色,而撒克逊的风险经理在所有四项能力上都表现出色。他们始终如一地审视内部和外部环境,寻找可以应用风险管理视角(开拓性)的重要问题,然后开发工具——比如季度风险报告——传播他们的专业知识(工具制造)。在控制工具的设计和实现的同时,风险经理结合了业务经理的见解(团队合作),并确保每个人都能理解发现(翻译)。最终,专家的角色必须符合组织的战略和结构需求。在某些情况下,职能专家可以通过培养其中两种能力来提升自己的形象。但那些在这四个方面都很强大的人可能是最有影响力的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: HBR covers a wide range of topics, including strategy, leadership, organizational change, negotiations, operations, innovation, decision making, marketing, finance, work-life balance, and managing teams. We publish articles of many lengths (some in both print and digital forms, and some in digital only), graphics, podcasts, videos, slide presentations, and just about any other media that might help us share an idea effectively.
期刊最新文献
When work feels like family, employees keep quiet about wrongdoing How to (actually) save time while working remotely Telling tales. 20. Where Babies Come From Stop holding yourself back.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1