[Replantation and reconstruction vs terminalization in the treatment of amputation of the digits].

Pawel Dec, Kalina Bartosik, Joanna Chrachol, Piotr Puchalski, Andrzej Zyluk
{"title":"[Replantation and reconstruction vs terminalization in the treatment of amputation of the digits].","authors":"Pawel Dec,&nbsp;Kalina Bartosik,&nbsp;Joanna Chrachol,&nbsp;Piotr Puchalski,&nbsp;Andrzej Zyluk","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study records the outcomes of the treatment of 21 patients, 19 men and two women, who sustained an amputation of the total of 35 digits (27 fingers and eight thumbs). Eleven patients received replantation or reconstruction maintaining the length of the digit, whereas ten had their digits terminalized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results were assessed at a mean of 5 years after injury. Patients with finger stumps had stronger grip than those with replanted digits (72% vs 48% of strength of the healthy hand). Hand function as assessed by quickDASH score (29 vs 33), quality of life as assessed by SF-36 score (63 vs 67) and number of patients experiencing cold sensitivity (7 vs 7) were similar in both groups. Patients after terminalization returned to work significantly earlier than those after replantation or reconstruction (6 vs 12 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results show that - considering function of the hand - replantation or advanced reconstruction offers the patient less benefit than simple terminalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7883,"journal":{"name":"Annales Academiae Medicae Stetinensis","volume":"59 1","pages":"49-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Academiae Medicae Stetinensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Material and methods: This study records the outcomes of the treatment of 21 patients, 19 men and two women, who sustained an amputation of the total of 35 digits (27 fingers and eight thumbs). Eleven patients received replantation or reconstruction maintaining the length of the digit, whereas ten had their digits terminalized.

Results: The results were assessed at a mean of 5 years after injury. Patients with finger stumps had stronger grip than those with replanted digits (72% vs 48% of strength of the healthy hand). Hand function as assessed by quickDASH score (29 vs 33), quality of life as assessed by SF-36 score (63 vs 67) and number of patients experiencing cold sensitivity (7 vs 7) were similar in both groups. Patients after terminalization returned to work significantly earlier than those after replantation or reconstruction (6 vs 12 months).

Conclusions: These results show that - considering function of the hand - replantation or advanced reconstruction offers the patient less benefit than simple terminalization.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指断的再植重建与终止治疗。
材料与方法:本研究记录了21例患者的治疗结果,男19例,女2例,共截肢35个手指(27个手指和8个拇指)。11例患者接受了再植或重建,保持了手指的长度,而10例患者的手指被终止。结果:损伤后平均5年评估结果。断指患者的握力比手指移植患者强(72%对48%)。两组中,quickDASH评分评估的手功能(29 vs 33)、SF-36评分评估的生活质量(63 vs 67)和经历冷敏感性的患者数量(7 vs 7)相似。术后患者复工时间明显早于术后患者(6个月vs 12个月)。结论:不考虑功能的手部再植或晚期再植对患者的益处不如单纯的终止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[ACNE VULGARIS--AETIOLOGY, CLASSIFICATION, TREATMENT]. INCREASING THE UPPER AIRWAY SPACE USING ORAL APPLIANCES IN PATIENTS WITH MILD SLEEP APNOEA CAUSED BY STOMATOGNATHIC DYSFUNCTIONS. [USE OF THE STRUCTURAL TENSEGRATION CONCEPT IN THE STECCO FASCIAL MANIPULATION METHOD]. THE INFLUENCE OF READING AND WRITING ON THE PREVALENCE OF MYOPIA. Antoni Christian Bryk (1820-1881) - professor of forensic medicine at Jagiellonian University (1852-1860), and director of the surgical clinic of Jagiellonian University in Cracow (1860-1881).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1