Applying Quantitative Approaches to the Formative Evaluation of Antismoking Campaign Messages.

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS Social Marketing Quarterly Pub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI:10.1177/1524500413506004
Sarah Parvanta, Laura Gibson, Heather Forquer, Dina Shapiro-Luft, Lorraine Dean, Derek Freres, Caryn Lerman, Giridhar Mallya, Mihaela Moldovan-Johnson, Andy Tan, Joseph Cappella, Robert Hornik
{"title":"Applying Quantitative Approaches to the Formative Evaluation of Antismoking Campaign Messages.","authors":"Sarah Parvanta,&nbsp;Laura Gibson,&nbsp;Heather Forquer,&nbsp;Dina Shapiro-Luft,&nbsp;Lorraine Dean,&nbsp;Derek Freres,&nbsp;Caryn Lerman,&nbsp;Giridhar Mallya,&nbsp;Mihaela Moldovan-Johnson,&nbsp;Andy Tan,&nbsp;Joseph Cappella,&nbsp;Robert Hornik","doi":"10.1177/1524500413506004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article shares an in-depth summary of a formative evaluation that used quantitative data to inform the development and selection of promotional ads for the antismoking communication component of a social marketing campaign. A foundational survey provided cross-sectional data to identify beliefs about quitting smoking that campaign messages should target, as well as beliefs to avoid. Pretesting draft ads against quantitative indicators of message effectiveness further facilitated the selection and rejection of final campaign ads. Finally, we consider lessons learned from the process of balancing quantitative methods and judgment to make formative decisions about more and less promising persuasive messages for campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":46085,"journal":{"name":"Social Marketing Quarterly","volume":"19 4","pages":"242-264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1524500413506004","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Marketing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500413506004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

This article shares an in-depth summary of a formative evaluation that used quantitative data to inform the development and selection of promotional ads for the antismoking communication component of a social marketing campaign. A foundational survey provided cross-sectional data to identify beliefs about quitting smoking that campaign messages should target, as well as beliefs to avoid. Pretesting draft ads against quantitative indicators of message effectiveness further facilitated the selection and rejection of final campaign ads. Finally, we consider lessons learned from the process of balancing quantitative methods and judgment to make formative decisions about more and less promising persuasive messages for campaigns.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用定量方法对禁烟运动信息的形成性评价。
这篇文章分享了一个形成性评估的深入总结,该评估使用定量数据来为社会营销活动中禁烟传播部分的促销广告的开发和选择提供信息。一项基础调查提供了横截面数据,以确定运动信息应该针对的戒烟信念,以及应该避免的信念。根据信息有效性的定量指标对广告草案进行预测试,进一步促进了最终广告的选择和拒绝。最后,我们考虑从平衡定量方法和判断的过程中吸取的教训,以对更有希望和更少有说服力的广告进行形成性决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Prospect of Social Marketing in Enhancing the Acquisition and Utilization of Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNs) for the Prevention of Malaria in a Rural Area of Imo State, South-Eastern Nigeria Examining the Effect of Message Strategies on Peruvian Mothers´ Intentions to Increase Fruit Intake Among Children The good death: The interplay between group dynamics, end of life decision making, and creative consumption Flushing out homeowner perceptions to improve voluntary septic to sewer conversion with social marketing Comparison of COVID-19 Behaviour Change Campaign Ads in Tanzania: Results From a Randomised Controlled Survey-Based Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1