Patients' mobility across borders: a welfare analysis.

Laura Levaggi, Rosella Levaggi
{"title":"Patients' mobility across borders: a welfare analysis.","authors":"Laura Levaggi,&nbsp;Rosella Levaggi","doi":"10.1007/978-88-470-5480-6_8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Welfare systems are designed on geographical and membership boundaries. In terms of access to health care this implies that, as a general rule, only individuals residing in their national territory can obtain health care from providers located there. However, in the past few years medical tourism has grown at an explosive pace throughout the world and in Europe. Each year in fact a small, but significant number of European citizens seek medical treatment that is financed by their public insurer in another EU country. From an economic point of view, it is important to distinguish between the two following sources of patients' mobility: a regulated mobility, where the third payer decides to send patients abroad and patients' choice, where the patient himself decides to seek care abroad. In this article we show how the combined effect of restrictions to the use of health care, transfer prices, and mobility rules determine social welfare and its allocation between Regions. The results are quite interesting: if the price set for these patients is equal to the marginal cost of the more efficient Region, patients' mobility should be preferred to patients' choice. On the other hand, if the price is equal to the marginal cost of the less efficient Region, patient choice should be preferred. The other interesting result is a possible trade off between a static model where each Region chooses its level of cost/effectiveness and a more long-term situation, where patient mobility determines a common level for this parameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":79866,"journal":{"name":"Developments in health economics and public policy","volume":"12 ","pages":"179-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in health economics and public policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5480-6_8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Welfare systems are designed on geographical and membership boundaries. In terms of access to health care this implies that, as a general rule, only individuals residing in their national territory can obtain health care from providers located there. However, in the past few years medical tourism has grown at an explosive pace throughout the world and in Europe. Each year in fact a small, but significant number of European citizens seek medical treatment that is financed by their public insurer in another EU country. From an economic point of view, it is important to distinguish between the two following sources of patients' mobility: a regulated mobility, where the third payer decides to send patients abroad and patients' choice, where the patient himself decides to seek care abroad. In this article we show how the combined effect of restrictions to the use of health care, transfer prices, and mobility rules determine social welfare and its allocation between Regions. The results are quite interesting: if the price set for these patients is equal to the marginal cost of the more efficient Region, patients' mobility should be preferred to patients' choice. On the other hand, if the price is equal to the marginal cost of the less efficient Region, patient choice should be preferred. The other interesting result is a possible trade off between a static model where each Region chooses its level of cost/effectiveness and a more long-term situation, where patient mobility determines a common level for this parameter.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者跨境流动:福利分析。
福利制度是根据地域和成员的界限设计的。在获得保健服务方面,这意味着,一般来说,只有居住在本国领土内的个人才能从设在本国境内的提供者那里获得保健服务。然而,在过去的几年里,医疗旅游在世界各地和欧洲以爆炸式的速度增长。事实上,每年都有为数不多但数量可观的欧洲公民在另一个欧盟国家寻求由其公共保险公司资助的医疗服务。从经济学的角度来看,区分以下两种患者流动来源是很重要的:一种是受管制的流动,即第三方付款人决定将患者送到国外;另一种是患者的选择,即患者自己决定在国外寻求治疗。在本文中,我们将展示限制医疗保健使用、转移价格和流动性规则的综合效应如何决定社会福利及其在地区之间的分配。结果非常有趣:如果为这些患者设定的价格等于更有效区域的边际成本,那么患者的流动性应该优先于患者的选择。另一方面,如果价格等于效率较低地区的边际成本,则应优先考虑患者的选择。另一个有趣的结果是在静态模型(每个区域选择其成本/效率水平)和更长期的情况(患者流动性决定该参数的公共水平)之间可能进行权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface. Health care provision and patient mobility. Health integration in the European Union. Patient choice, mobility and competition among health care providers. Using discrete choice experiments to understand preferences in health care. Implications of the EU patients' rights directive in cross-border healthcare on the German sickness fund system. The possible effects of health professional mobility on access to care for patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1