An evaluation of condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescents with unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Q Medicine Australian Orthodontic Journal Pub Date : 2014-05-01
Koray Halicioglu, Mevlut Celikoglu, Ibrahim Yavuz, Ahmet Ercan Sekerci, Suleyman Kutalmis Buyuk
{"title":"An evaluation of condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescents with unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).","authors":"Koray Halicioglu,&nbsp;Mevlut Celikoglu,&nbsp;Ibrahim Yavuz,&nbsp;Ahmet Ercan Sekerci,&nbsp;Suleyman Kutalmis Buyuk","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The primary purpose was to evaluate condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescent patients displaying unilateral posterior (UCB) and bilateral posterior crossbite (BCB) malocclusions. A secondary aim was to compare the findings with a matched control group exhibiting normal occlusion (CG) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study groups consisted of (1) 30 patients (Mean age: 14.49 +/- 1.91 years) with a UCB, (2) 29 patients (Mean age: 14.57 +/- 1.84 years) with a BCB, and (3) 36 patients (Mean age: 14.24 +/- 2.42 years) as a matched control group (CG). Condylar, ramal, condylar-plus-ramal height and index measurements were performed using CBCT images following the method of Habets et al. A paired t-test was performed for side comparison in each group. Oneway ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) was used to determine statistically-significant differences between the groups for asymmetry index measurements and Tukey's HSD test was employed for individual group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in condylar height (CH), ramal height (RH), and condylar plus ramal height (CH + RH) measurements between the right and left sides of the UCB group and CG, except for the RH in the BCB group (p = 0.045). Tukey's HSD test showed that the ramal asymmetry index (RAI) and the condylar plus the ramal asymmetry index (CRAI) were statistically significantly different between the UCB and BCB groups (p = 0.035 and p = 0.015, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the condylar asymmetry index (CAI) values were found to be high in the groups of UCB (13.84 +/- 11.33), BCB (9.38 +/- 8.56), and CG (10.58 +/- 9.48), the comparisons amongst the groups were not statistically significant. The asymmetry between the UCB and BCB groups was observed for RAI and CRAI values, rather than CAI values.</p>","PeriodicalId":55417,"journal":{"name":"Australian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"11-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The primary purpose was to evaluate condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescent patients displaying unilateral posterior (UCB) and bilateral posterior crossbite (BCB) malocclusions. A secondary aim was to compare the findings with a matched control group exhibiting normal occlusion (CG) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Material and methods: The study groups consisted of (1) 30 patients (Mean age: 14.49 +/- 1.91 years) with a UCB, (2) 29 patients (Mean age: 14.57 +/- 1.84 years) with a BCB, and (3) 36 patients (Mean age: 14.24 +/- 2.42 years) as a matched control group (CG). Condylar, ramal, condylar-plus-ramal height and index measurements were performed using CBCT images following the method of Habets et al. A paired t-test was performed for side comparison in each group. Oneway ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) was used to determine statistically-significant differences between the groups for asymmetry index measurements and Tukey's HSD test was employed for individual group differences.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in condylar height (CH), ramal height (RH), and condylar plus ramal height (CH + RH) measurements between the right and left sides of the UCB group and CG, except for the RH in the BCB group (p = 0.045). Tukey's HSD test showed that the ramal asymmetry index (RAI) and the condylar plus the ramal asymmetry index (CRAI) were statistically significantly different between the UCB and BCB groups (p = 0.035 and p = 0.015, respectively).

Conclusions: Although the condylar asymmetry index (CAI) values were found to be high in the groups of UCB (13.84 +/- 11.33), BCB (9.38 +/- 8.56), and CG (10.58 +/- 9.48), the comparisons amongst the groups were not statistically significant. The asymmetry between the UCB and BCB groups was observed for RAI and CRAI values, rather than CAI values.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估青少年单侧和双侧后牙合患者的髁突和下颌垂直不对称。
目的:主要目的是评估青少年单侧后牙合(UCB)和双侧后牙合(BCB)错颌患者的髁突和分支垂直不对称。第二个目的是使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)将结果与显示正常闭塞(CG)的匹配对照组进行比较。材料和方法:研究组包括:(1)30例UCB患者(平均年龄:14.49 +/- 1.91岁),(2)29例BCB患者(平均年龄:14.57 +/- 1.84岁),(3)36例患者(平均年龄:14.24 +/- 2.42岁)作为匹配的对照组(CG)。采用CBCT图像,按照Habets等人的方法测量髁突、髁突、髁突加髁突的高度和指数。各组侧比较采用配对t检验。不对称指数测量采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)确定组间差异有统计学意义,组间差异采用Tukey’s HSD检验。结果:除BCB组的RH外,UCB组的左右两侧髁突高度(CH)、髁突高度(RH)、髁突加髁突高度(CH + RH)测量值与CG比较,差异均无统计学意义(p = 0.045)。Tukey’s HSD检验显示,UCB组与BCB组间髁间ramal不对称指数(RAI)、髁间ramal不对称指数(CRAI)差异均有统计学意义(p = 0.035、p = 0.015)。结论:虽然UCB组(13.84 +/- 11.33)、BCB组(9.38 +/- 8.56)、CG组(10.58 +/- 9.48)髁突不对称指数(CAI)值较高,但组间比较无统计学意义。UCB组和BCB组的RAI和CRAI值不对称,而CAI值不对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Orthodontic Journal
Australian Orthodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.48
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Minimizing publication bias. Looking backwards into the Future of Orthodontics. Orthodontic Education. Australian Orthodontists: are they "with it". The role of the foundation in Australian Orthodontic education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1