[Living with responsibility: Max Born and Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker as philosophers with distance].

Acta historica Leopoldina Pub Date : 2014-01-01
Arne Schirrmacher
{"title":"[Living with responsibility: Max Born and Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker as philosophers with distance].","authors":"Arne Schirrmacher","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker und Max Born belong to the most active scientists, which have raised their voice for peace in the 1950s. While Born, senior to Weizsäcker by one generation, engaged in peace movements at an early stage, which was also due to his emigration, and was a driving force for the Einstein-Russell memorandum, Weizsäcker entered the stage essentially with the Göttingen declaration but quickly dominated the discourse. The comparison of their different engagements for peace sheds new light on Weizsäcker. Unlike the German emigrant with a British passport, who was mainly influenced by EInstein and Russell as well as some socialist thoughts he had encountered at an early age, the son of a noble diplomat and the physicist, who was saved from military duties because of his work in the German wartime nuclear project, had quite a different perspective on the postwar atomic threat. The relation of Born and Weizsäcker remained marked by a certain distance even when both took up very similar roles of 'public scientists' active for peace, be it as delegates at Pugwash conferences, on the air, or as speakers in the Frankfurt Paulskirche.</p>","PeriodicalId":7006,"journal":{"name":"Acta historica Leopoldina","volume":" 63","pages":"357-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta historica Leopoldina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker und Max Born belong to the most active scientists, which have raised their voice for peace in the 1950s. While Born, senior to Weizsäcker by one generation, engaged in peace movements at an early stage, which was also due to his emigration, and was a driving force for the Einstein-Russell memorandum, Weizsäcker entered the stage essentially with the Göttingen declaration but quickly dominated the discourse. The comparison of their different engagements for peace sheds new light on Weizsäcker. Unlike the German emigrant with a British passport, who was mainly influenced by EInstein and Russell as well as some socialist thoughts he had encountered at an early age, the son of a noble diplomat and the physicist, who was saved from military duties because of his work in the German wartime nuclear project, had quite a different perspective on the postwar atomic threat. The relation of Born and Weizsäcker remained marked by a certain distance even when both took up very similar roles of 'public scientists' active for peace, be it as delegates at Pugwash conferences, on the air, or as speakers in the Frankfurt Paulskirche.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[有责任的生活:马克斯·波恩和卡尔·弗里德里希·冯Weizsäcker作为有距离的哲学家]。
卡尔·弗里德里希·冯Weizsäcker和马克斯·伯恩都属于最活跃的科学家,他们在20世纪50年代为和平发出了声音。比Weizsäcker年长一代的伯恩早年也曾参与和平运动,这也是他移民的原因,他是爱因斯坦-罗素备忘录的推动力量,而Weizsäcker基本上是通过Göttingen宣言进入舞台的,但很快就占据了话语权。通过比较他们不同的和平行动,我们可以了解Weizsäcker。这位持英国护照的德国移民主要受爱因斯坦和罗素的影响,以及早年接触到的一些社会主义思想。与他不同的是,这位高贵的外交官和物理学家的儿子对战后的原子威胁有着完全不同的看法,因为他在德国战时的核项目中工作,而没有承担军事责任。波恩和Weizsäcker的关系仍然有一定的距离,即使他们都扮演了非常相似的“公共科学家”的角色,为和平而活跃,无论是作为帕格沃什会议的代表,在广播中,还是作为法兰克福圣保罗教堂的演讲者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[[In process].] [Not Available.] [Not Available.] The Great War as a Crucial Point in the History of Russian Science and Technology. [In process.]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1