Clinical practice guidelines in psychiatry: more confusion than clarity? A critical review and recommendation of a unified guideline.

ISRN Psychiatry Pub Date : 2014-03-31 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/828917
Sahoo Saddichha, Santosh K Chaturvedi
{"title":"Clinical practice guidelines in psychiatry: more confusion than clarity? A critical review and recommendation of a unified guideline.","authors":"Sahoo Saddichha,&nbsp;Santosh K Chaturvedi","doi":"10.1155/2014/828917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The discipline of psychiatry has a plethora of guidelines, designed to serve the needs of the clinician. Yet, even a cursory glance is enough to discern the differences between the various guidelines. This paper reviews the current standard guidelines being followed across the world and proposes a unified guideline on the backbone of current evidence and practice being followed. The algorithm for pharmacological and psychosocial treatment for bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia is formulated after cross-comparison across four different guidelines and recent meta-analytical evidence. For every disorder, guidelines have different suggestions. Hence, based on the current status of evidence, algorithms have been combined to form a unified guideline for management. Clinical practice guidelines form the basis of standard clinical practice for all disciplines of medicine, including psychiatry. Yet, they are often not read or followed because of poor quality or because of barriers to implementation due to either lack of agreement or ambiguity. A unified guideline can go a long way in helping clear some of the confusion that has crept in due to the use of different guidelines across the world. </p>","PeriodicalId":14749,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Psychiatry","volume":"2014 ","pages":"828917"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/828917","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/828917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The discipline of psychiatry has a plethora of guidelines, designed to serve the needs of the clinician. Yet, even a cursory glance is enough to discern the differences between the various guidelines. This paper reviews the current standard guidelines being followed across the world and proposes a unified guideline on the backbone of current evidence and practice being followed. The algorithm for pharmacological and psychosocial treatment for bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia is formulated after cross-comparison across four different guidelines and recent meta-analytical evidence. For every disorder, guidelines have different suggestions. Hence, based on the current status of evidence, algorithms have been combined to form a unified guideline for management. Clinical practice guidelines form the basis of standard clinical practice for all disciplines of medicine, including psychiatry. Yet, they are often not read or followed because of poor quality or because of barriers to implementation due to either lack of agreement or ambiguity. A unified guideline can go a long way in helping clear some of the confusion that has crept in due to the use of different guidelines across the world.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神病学临床实践指南:混乱多于清晰?对统一指导方针的批判性审查和建议。
精神病学学科有大量的指导方针,旨在满足临床医生的需要。然而,即使粗略地看一眼,也足以辨别各种指导方针之间的差异。本文回顾了目前世界各地正在遵循的标准指南,并提出了一个统一的指南,以目前的证据和实践为基础。双相情感障碍、重度抑郁症和精神分裂症的药理学和社会心理治疗算法是在对四种不同指南和最近的荟萃分析证据进行交叉比较后制定的。对于每一种疾病,指南都有不同的建议。因此,根据目前的证据状况,将算法结合起来,形成统一的管理指南。临床实践指南构成了包括精神病学在内的所有医学学科的标准临床实践的基础。然而,由于质量差,或者由于缺乏一致意见或含糊不清而造成的实施障碍,它们往往没有被阅读或遵循。统一的指导方针可以在很大程度上帮助消除由于世界各地使用不同的指导方针而产生的一些混乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empathy in undergraduate medical students of bangladesh: psychometric analysis and differences by gender, academic year, and specialty preferences. Ziprasidone as adjunctive therapy in severe bipolar patients treated with clozapine. Clinical practice guidelines in psychiatry: more confusion than clarity? A critical review and recommendation of a unified guideline. The psychogeriatric patient in the emergency room: focus on management and disposition. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 negative modulation in phase I clinical trial: potential impact of circadian rhythm on the neuropsychiatric adverse reactions-do hallucinations matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1