[Evaluation of the quality of life of patients undergoing rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis].

Paulina Brzeska, Irena Bułatowicz, Wioletta Jagucka-Metel, Agata Baranowska, Ewa Sobolewska
{"title":"[Evaluation of the quality of life of patients undergoing rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis].","authors":"Paulina Brzeska,&nbsp;Irena Bułatowicz,&nbsp;Wioletta Jagucka-Metel,&nbsp;Agata Baranowska,&nbsp;Ewa Sobolewska","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess the quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis who underwent complex rehabilitation, and to identify the aspect (psychological, physical or social) in which most improvement was achieved with respect to quality of life after complex rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was carried out from July to September 2010 at the Centre for the Rehabilitation of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in Borne Sulinowo. The study group included 30 subjects with diagnosed multiple sclerosis. The study was based on a diagnostic survey--a questionnaire for direct survey. We used the reintegration to normal living index scale (RNLI) and expanded disability status scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a statistically significant improvement in the assessment of the quality of life in patients who underwent complex rehabilitation (p = 0.000000). The analysis of individual aspects of the quality of life revealed a statistically significant improvement in all aspects: psychological (p = 0.000027), physical (p = 0.000090) and social (p = 0.000026). The difference in the assessment of the quality of life in the social aspect was 1.21, in the physical aspect - 1.16, and in the psychological aspect - 0.86. The greatest difference in the assessment of the quality of life was found for the social aspect, and the lowest in the psychological aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complex rehabilitation improves the self--reported quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis in all its aspects. After complex rehabilitation the highest scores were found for the assessment of the quality of life in the psychological aspect, but the greatest improvement in the quality of life was in the social aspect, proving the positive effects of sociotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7883,"journal":{"name":"Annales Academiae Medicae Stetinensis","volume":"59 2","pages":"133-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Academiae Medicae Stetinensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis who underwent complex rehabilitation, and to identify the aspect (psychological, physical or social) in which most improvement was achieved with respect to quality of life after complex rehabilitation.

Materials and methods: The study was carried out from July to September 2010 at the Centre for the Rehabilitation of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in Borne Sulinowo. The study group included 30 subjects with diagnosed multiple sclerosis. The study was based on a diagnostic survey--a questionnaire for direct survey. We used the reintegration to normal living index scale (RNLI) and expanded disability status scale.

Results: We found a statistically significant improvement in the assessment of the quality of life in patients who underwent complex rehabilitation (p = 0.000000). The analysis of individual aspects of the quality of life revealed a statistically significant improvement in all aspects: psychological (p = 0.000027), physical (p = 0.000090) and social (p = 0.000026). The difference in the assessment of the quality of life in the social aspect was 1.21, in the physical aspect - 1.16, and in the psychological aspect - 0.86. The greatest difference in the assessment of the quality of life was found for the social aspect, and the lowest in the psychological aspects.

Conclusions: Complex rehabilitation improves the self--reported quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis in all its aspects. After complex rehabilitation the highest scores were found for the assessment of the quality of life in the psychological aspect, but the greatest improvement in the quality of life was in the social aspect, proving the positive effects of sociotherapy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[多发性硬化症康复患者生活质量评价]。
简介:本研究的目的是评估接受复杂康复治疗的多发性硬化症患者的生活质量,并确定复杂康复后生活质量改善最多的方面(心理、身体或社会)。材料和方法:该研究于2010年7月至9月在Borne Sulinowo多发性硬化症患者康复中心进行。研究组包括30名诊断为多发性硬化症的受试者。这项研究是基于一项诊断性调查——一份直接调查的问卷。我们使用了重新融入正常生活指数量表(RNLI)和扩展的残疾状态量表。结果:我们发现接受复杂康复治疗的患者的生活质量评估有统计学意义的改善(p = 0.000000)。对生活质量各个方面的分析显示,各方面都有统计学上的显著改善:心理(p = 0.000027)、身体(p = 0.000090)和社会(p = 0.000026)。社会生活质量评价的差异为1.21,身体生活质量评价的差异为1.16,心理生活质量评价的差异为0.86。在对生活质量的评估中,社会方面的差异最大,心理方面的差异最小。结论:复杂康复在各个方面提高了多发性硬化症患者自我报告的生活质量。综合康复后患者在心理方面的生活质量评价得分最高,但在社会方面的生活质量改善最大,证明了社会治疗的积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[ACNE VULGARIS--AETIOLOGY, CLASSIFICATION, TREATMENT]. INCREASING THE UPPER AIRWAY SPACE USING ORAL APPLIANCES IN PATIENTS WITH MILD SLEEP APNOEA CAUSED BY STOMATOGNATHIC DYSFUNCTIONS. [USE OF THE STRUCTURAL TENSEGRATION CONCEPT IN THE STECCO FASCIAL MANIPULATION METHOD]. THE INFLUENCE OF READING AND WRITING ON THE PREVALENCE OF MYOPIA. Antoni Christian Bryk (1820-1881) - professor of forensic medicine at Jagiellonian University (1852-1860), and director of the surgical clinic of Jagiellonian University in Cracow (1860-1881).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1