Using hospital data and routines to estimate costs and effects of integrative care programmes for chronic pain and stress disorders--a feasibility study.

Forschende Komplementarmedizin Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-06-16 DOI:10.1159/000363635
Tobias Sundberg, Torkel Falkenberg
{"title":"Using hospital data and routines to estimate costs and effects of integrative care programmes for chronic pain and stress disorders--a feasibility study.","authors":"Tobias Sundberg,&nbsp;Torkel Falkenberg","doi":"10.1159/000363635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence of cost and effects for comprehensive hospital-based integrative care (IC) is scarce. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of using local hospital data and routines to estimate costs and effects of anthroposophic IC programmes for chronic pain and stress disorders in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of one IC hospital's local administrative registry data. Main outcomes embraced patient demographics, programme duration and costs, patients' health status (EQ-5D index, 0-1) and self-rated health (EQ-5D VAS, 0-100), from hospital admittance to discharge. The use of postal questionnares for collecting follow-up data after hospital discharge was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IC pain programme had 461 records, all with complete data on costs and duration: average programme cost, EUR 5,925 (95% CI 5,780-6,070), and duration, 17.8 (SD 4.7) days. The IC stress programme had 263 records, all with complete cost and duration data: programme cost, EUR 5,494 (95%CI 5,318-5,671); duration 18.0 (SD 4.7) days. From admittance to discharge, health status improved by 0.23 (95% CI 0.19-0.27) in the pain, and by 0.16 (95% CI 0.12-0.20) in the stress programme. Improvements in self-rated health were 20 (95% CI 18-22), and 21 (95% CI 18-23), respectively. There was a general decrease in questionnaire response rate after hospital discharge, whereby 27-32% of respondents had completed data after 9 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was feasible to use hospital registry data to estimate costs and show positive effects of anthroposophic IC programmes for pain and stress disorders in Sweden. Clinical implications and the need for long-term follow-up are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51049,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000363635","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000363635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Evidence of cost and effects for comprehensive hospital-based integrative care (IC) is scarce. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of using local hospital data and routines to estimate costs and effects of anthroposophic IC programmes for chronic pain and stress disorders in Sweden.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of one IC hospital's local administrative registry data. Main outcomes embraced patient demographics, programme duration and costs, patients' health status (EQ-5D index, 0-1) and self-rated health (EQ-5D VAS, 0-100), from hospital admittance to discharge. The use of postal questionnares for collecting follow-up data after hospital discharge was assessed.

Results: The IC pain programme had 461 records, all with complete data on costs and duration: average programme cost, EUR 5,925 (95% CI 5,780-6,070), and duration, 17.8 (SD 4.7) days. The IC stress programme had 263 records, all with complete cost and duration data: programme cost, EUR 5,494 (95%CI 5,318-5,671); duration 18.0 (SD 4.7) days. From admittance to discharge, health status improved by 0.23 (95% CI 0.19-0.27) in the pain, and by 0.16 (95% CI 0.12-0.20) in the stress programme. Improvements in self-rated health were 20 (95% CI 18-22), and 21 (95% CI 18-23), respectively. There was a general decrease in questionnaire response rate after hospital discharge, whereby 27-32% of respondents had completed data after 9 months.

Conclusions: It was feasible to use hospital registry data to estimate costs and show positive effects of anthroposophic IC programmes for pain and stress disorders in Sweden. Clinical implications and the need for long-term follow-up are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用医院数据和惯例估算慢性疼痛和应激障碍综合护理方案的成本和效果——可行性研究。
背景:基于医院的综合护理(IC)的成本和效果的证据很少。本研究的目的是探讨利用当地医院数据和常规来估计瑞典慢性疼痛和应激障碍的人智IC方案的成本和效果的可行性。方法:回顾性分析某IC医院的地方行政登记资料。主要结局包括患者人口统计、项目持续时间和成本、患者健康状况(EQ-5D指数,0-1)和自评健康(EQ-5D VAS, 0-100),从入院到出院。评估了使用邮寄问卷收集出院后随访数据的情况。结果:IC疼痛方案有461条记录,所有记录都有成本和持续时间的完整数据:平均方案成本为5,925欧元(95% CI 5,780-6,070),持续时间为17.8 (SD 4.7)天。IC压力计划有263条记录,所有记录都有完整的成本和持续时间数据:计划成本,5,494欧元(95%CI 5,318-5,671);持续时间18.0 (SD 4.7)天。从入院到出院,疼痛组健康状况改善了0.23 (95% CI 0.19-0.27),应激组健康状况改善了0.16 (95% CI 0.12-0.20)。自评健康的改善分别为20 (95% CI 18-22)和21 (95% CI 18-23)。出院后问卷回复率普遍下降,其中27-32%的受访者在9个月后完成了数据。结论:在瑞典,使用医院登记数据来估计成本并显示人智IC方案对疼痛和应激障碍的积极影响是可行的。临床意义和需要长期随访讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forschende Komplementarmedizin
Forschende Komplementarmedizin 医学-全科医学与补充医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[And the winner is... ]. Computerized Cognitive Training Programs Improving Memory Performance in Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [Kommentar zur Originalarbeit «COPD und Klangtherapie: Pilotstudie zur Wirksamkeit einer Behandlung mit Körpertambura bei COPD-Patienten» von Hartwig et al]. Integrative versus Conventional Therapy of Chronic Otitis Media with Effusion and Adenoid Hypertrophy in Children: A Prospective Observational Study. [Veg* in der Medizin - schon längst viel mehr als nur ein Trend].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1