Using hospital data and routines to estimate costs and effects of integrative care programmes for chronic pain and stress disorders--a feasibility study.
{"title":"Using hospital data and routines to estimate costs and effects of integrative care programmes for chronic pain and stress disorders--a feasibility study.","authors":"Tobias Sundberg, Torkel Falkenberg","doi":"10.1159/000363635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence of cost and effects for comprehensive hospital-based integrative care (IC) is scarce. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of using local hospital data and routines to estimate costs and effects of anthroposophic IC programmes for chronic pain and stress disorders in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of one IC hospital's local administrative registry data. Main outcomes embraced patient demographics, programme duration and costs, patients' health status (EQ-5D index, 0-1) and self-rated health (EQ-5D VAS, 0-100), from hospital admittance to discharge. The use of postal questionnares for collecting follow-up data after hospital discharge was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IC pain programme had 461 records, all with complete data on costs and duration: average programme cost, EUR 5,925 (95% CI 5,780-6,070), and duration, 17.8 (SD 4.7) days. The IC stress programme had 263 records, all with complete cost and duration data: programme cost, EUR 5,494 (95%CI 5,318-5,671); duration 18.0 (SD 4.7) days. From admittance to discharge, health status improved by 0.23 (95% CI 0.19-0.27) in the pain, and by 0.16 (95% CI 0.12-0.20) in the stress programme. Improvements in self-rated health were 20 (95% CI 18-22), and 21 (95% CI 18-23), respectively. There was a general decrease in questionnaire response rate after hospital discharge, whereby 27-32% of respondents had completed data after 9 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was feasible to use hospital registry data to estimate costs and show positive effects of anthroposophic IC programmes for pain and stress disorders in Sweden. Clinical implications and the need for long-term follow-up are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51049,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000363635","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000363635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Background: Evidence of cost and effects for comprehensive hospital-based integrative care (IC) is scarce. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of using local hospital data and routines to estimate costs and effects of anthroposophic IC programmes for chronic pain and stress disorders in Sweden.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of one IC hospital's local administrative registry data. Main outcomes embraced patient demographics, programme duration and costs, patients' health status (EQ-5D index, 0-1) and self-rated health (EQ-5D VAS, 0-100), from hospital admittance to discharge. The use of postal questionnares for collecting follow-up data after hospital discharge was assessed.
Results: The IC pain programme had 461 records, all with complete data on costs and duration: average programme cost, EUR 5,925 (95% CI 5,780-6,070), and duration, 17.8 (SD 4.7) days. The IC stress programme had 263 records, all with complete cost and duration data: programme cost, EUR 5,494 (95%CI 5,318-5,671); duration 18.0 (SD 4.7) days. From admittance to discharge, health status improved by 0.23 (95% CI 0.19-0.27) in the pain, and by 0.16 (95% CI 0.12-0.20) in the stress programme. Improvements in self-rated health were 20 (95% CI 18-22), and 21 (95% CI 18-23), respectively. There was a general decrease in questionnaire response rate after hospital discharge, whereby 27-32% of respondents had completed data after 9 months.
Conclusions: It was feasible to use hospital registry data to estimate costs and show positive effects of anthroposophic IC programmes for pain and stress disorders in Sweden. Clinical implications and the need for long-term follow-up are discussed.
背景:基于医院的综合护理(IC)的成本和效果的证据很少。本研究的目的是探讨利用当地医院数据和常规来估计瑞典慢性疼痛和应激障碍的人智IC方案的成本和效果的可行性。方法:回顾性分析某IC医院的地方行政登记资料。主要结局包括患者人口统计、项目持续时间和成本、患者健康状况(EQ-5D指数,0-1)和自评健康(EQ-5D VAS, 0-100),从入院到出院。评估了使用邮寄问卷收集出院后随访数据的情况。结果:IC疼痛方案有461条记录,所有记录都有成本和持续时间的完整数据:平均方案成本为5,925欧元(95% CI 5,780-6,070),持续时间为17.8 (SD 4.7)天。IC压力计划有263条记录,所有记录都有完整的成本和持续时间数据:计划成本,5,494欧元(95%CI 5,318-5,671);持续时间18.0 (SD 4.7)天。从入院到出院,疼痛组健康状况改善了0.23 (95% CI 0.19-0.27),应激组健康状况改善了0.16 (95% CI 0.12-0.20)。自评健康的改善分别为20 (95% CI 18-22)和21 (95% CI 18-23)。出院后问卷回复率普遍下降,其中27-32%的受访者在9个月后完成了数据。结论:在瑞典,使用医院登记数据来估计成本并显示人智IC方案对疼痛和应激障碍的积极影响是可行的。临床意义和需要长期随访讨论。