[Evaluation of the sensitivity of a densitometry system, in judging the result of influenza virus antigen-detection kit using immunochromatography].

Ikuo Yamaguchi, Tomoe Aoyama, Masaru Yamamoto, Keiko Kinosita, Yumi Ito
{"title":"[Evaluation of the sensitivity of a densitometry system, in judging the result of influenza virus antigen-detection kit using immunochromatography].","authors":"Ikuo Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Tomoe Aoyama,&nbsp;Masaru Yamamoto,&nbsp;Keiko Kinosita,&nbsp;Yumi Ito","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunochromatography viral antigen-detection kits have become popular in clinical settings in Japan. Influenza virus detection kit is one of them. It is sometimes used in early phase of the disease, combined with the early treatment with anti-influenza drugs. Most of them are invented to visually read the test line on their kits. However, we should be careful about their reliability of them. Sometimes human errors occur at the visual tests, and they have different sensitivities among the kits from different companies. In this report, we evaluated the sensitivity of BD Veritor System Flu with its reader by comparing with conventional visual tests. A total of 84 people including laboratory technologists were asked to visually read test line and their answers were compared with results of BD Veritor System Reader. This study showed that the lower the concentration of standard sample was applied, the greater the error ratio of visual test became, indicating the stable sensitivity of Veritor System. Moreover, the sensitivity was compared with three other major products approved in Japan, using four influenza viruses: type A of H1N1 seasonal 2009, H1N1 pandemic 2009, H3N2 seasonal 2012 and type B of seasonal 2012. It was indicated that Veritor System had the highest limit of detection from the kits.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"24 2","pages":"69-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immunochromatography viral antigen-detection kits have become popular in clinical settings in Japan. Influenza virus detection kit is one of them. It is sometimes used in early phase of the disease, combined with the early treatment with anti-influenza drugs. Most of them are invented to visually read the test line on their kits. However, we should be careful about their reliability of them. Sometimes human errors occur at the visual tests, and they have different sensitivities among the kits from different companies. In this report, we evaluated the sensitivity of BD Veritor System Flu with its reader by comparing with conventional visual tests. A total of 84 people including laboratory technologists were asked to visually read test line and their answers were compared with results of BD Veritor System Reader. This study showed that the lower the concentration of standard sample was applied, the greater the error ratio of visual test became, indicating the stable sensitivity of Veritor System. Moreover, the sensitivity was compared with three other major products approved in Japan, using four influenza viruses: type A of H1N1 seasonal 2009, H1N1 pandemic 2009, H3N2 seasonal 2012 and type B of seasonal 2012. It was indicated that Veritor System had the highest limit of detection from the kits.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【用免疫层析法判断流感病毒抗原检测试剂盒结果时,密度测定系统的灵敏度评价】。
免疫层析病毒抗原检测试剂盒已成为流行在日本的临床设置。流感病毒检测试剂盒就是其中之一。它有时在疾病的早期阶段使用,与抗流感药物的早期治疗相结合。它们中的大多数都是为了直观地读取试剂盒上的测试线而发明的。然而,我们应该小心他们的可靠性。有时在视觉测试中会出现人为错误,并且不同公司的试剂盒具有不同的灵敏度。在本报告中,我们通过比较传统的视觉测试来评估BD Veritor System Flu及其阅读器的敏感性。包括实验室技术人员在内的84人被要求视觉阅读测试线,并将他们的答案与BD Veritor系统阅读器的结果进行比较。本研究表明,标准样品的浓度越低,视觉检测的误差率越大,说明Veritor系统灵敏度稳定。此外,与日本批准的其他三种主要产品进行敏感性比较,使用四种流感病毒:2009年H1N1季节性A型,2009年H1N1大流行,2012年H3N2季节性和2012年季节性B型。结果表明,Veritor系统的检出限最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Japanese Case of COVID-19 Caused by Omicron Strain with Y453F Substitution. [Evaluation of Methicillin Resistance Determination Time for MRSA Using Fully Automated Rapid Identification Susceptibility testing system RAISAS S4]. [Evaluation of the Clinical Validity of the Clostridioides difficile Nucleic Acid Detection Kit "Smart Gene® CD ToxinB"]. [Relationship between Serotypes and Biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica and the Names of Identified Bacteria in the Microbial Identification and Susceptibility Testing Devices]. Comparison of Microorganism Detection, Time to Positivity, and Time-Dependent Shift in Viable Bacterial Count from VersaTREK and BacT/ALERT 3D Blood Culture Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1