Does Cognitive Dysfunction after Carotid Endarterectomy Vary by Statin Type or Dose?

Eric J Heyer, Joanna L Mergeche, Samuel S Bruce, E Sander Connolly
{"title":"Does Cognitive Dysfunction after Carotid Endarterectomy Vary by Statin Type or Dose?","authors":"Eric J Heyer,&nbsp;Joanna L Mergeche,&nbsp;Samuel S Bruce,&nbsp;E Sander Connolly","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our previous work demonstrates that asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients demonstrate less perioperative neurologic injury, defined as stroke and early cognitive dysfunction (eCD) observed within 24hr of CEA, when taking statins pre-operatively. This study examines whether the incidence of eCD observed 24hr after asymptomatic CEA varies as a function of statin type or dose. Patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis scheduled for CEA consented to participate in an observational IRB-approved study (N=324). Patients were evaluated with an extensive battery of neuropsychometric tests pre-operatively and 24hr post-operatively. Of the 324 consented patients, 200 were taking statins. Patients taking pravastatin and fluvastatin exhibited no eCD, while patients taking lovastatin (17.7%) and rosuvastatin (16.7%) exhibited incidences of eCD similar to those not taking statins (20.2%). Patients taking simvastatin exhibited a significantly lower incidence of eCD than those taking atorvastatin (3.0% vs. 16.0%, P=0.005). Patients taking a maximal dose of any statin exhibited a significantly lower incidence of eCD than patients taking sub-maximal doses (2.7% vs. 15.9%, P=0.002). These observations suggest that the incidence of eCD may in fact vary as a function of statin type and that maximal doses may be the optimal dose for patients undergoing CEA. This variation may be due to the physico-chemical properties of statins such as lipophilicity, molecular size, and blood brain barrier penetrability. These findings should be used to inspire randomized prospective work to determine the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of optimizing statin use prior to CEA.</p>","PeriodicalId":90541,"journal":{"name":"International journal of brain and cognitive sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4151112/pdf/nihms520386.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of brain and cognitive sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our previous work demonstrates that asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients demonstrate less perioperative neurologic injury, defined as stroke and early cognitive dysfunction (eCD) observed within 24hr of CEA, when taking statins pre-operatively. This study examines whether the incidence of eCD observed 24hr after asymptomatic CEA varies as a function of statin type or dose. Patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis scheduled for CEA consented to participate in an observational IRB-approved study (N=324). Patients were evaluated with an extensive battery of neuropsychometric tests pre-operatively and 24hr post-operatively. Of the 324 consented patients, 200 were taking statins. Patients taking pravastatin and fluvastatin exhibited no eCD, while patients taking lovastatin (17.7%) and rosuvastatin (16.7%) exhibited incidences of eCD similar to those not taking statins (20.2%). Patients taking simvastatin exhibited a significantly lower incidence of eCD than those taking atorvastatin (3.0% vs. 16.0%, P=0.005). Patients taking a maximal dose of any statin exhibited a significantly lower incidence of eCD than patients taking sub-maximal doses (2.7% vs. 15.9%, P=0.002). These observations suggest that the incidence of eCD may in fact vary as a function of statin type and that maximal doses may be the optimal dose for patients undergoing CEA. This variation may be due to the physico-chemical properties of statins such as lipophilicity, molecular size, and blood brain barrier penetrability. These findings should be used to inspire randomized prospective work to determine the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of optimizing statin use prior to CEA.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈动脉内膜切除术后认知功能障碍是否因他汀类药物类型或剂量而异?
我们之前的研究表明,无症状颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)患者术前服用他汀类药物时,围手术期神经损伤较少,神经损伤定义为卒中和早期认知功能障碍(eCD)在CEA后24小时内观察到。本研究探讨无症状CEA后24小时观察到的eCD发生率是否随他汀类药物类型或剂量的变化而变化。计划进行CEA的无症状颈动脉狭窄患者同意参加一项经irb批准的观察性研究(N=324)。术前和术后24小时对患者进行广泛的神经心理测试。在324名同意的患者中,200名正在服用他汀类药物。服用普伐他汀和氟伐他汀的患者无eCD,而服用洛伐他汀(17.7%)和瑞舒伐他汀(16.7%)的患者eCD发生率与未服用他汀的患者相似(20.2%)。服用辛伐他汀的患者eCD发生率明显低于服用阿托伐他汀的患者(3.0% vs. 16.0%, P=0.005)。服用最大剂量他汀类药物的患者的eCD发生率明显低于服用次最大剂量的患者(2.7% vs. 15.9%, P=0.002)。这些观察结果表明,eCD的发生率实际上可能随他汀类药物类型的不同而变化,最大剂量可能是CEA患者的最佳剂量。这种变化可能是由于他汀类药物的物理化学性质,如亲脂性、分子大小和血脑屏障穿透性。这些发现应用于激励随机前瞻性工作,以确定CEA前优化他汀类药物使用的安全性、可行性和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Cognitive Dysfunction after Carotid Endarterectomy Vary by Statin Type or Dose?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1